Stipulation to Dismiss Appeal: Bricklayers Union v. Quality General
Summary
The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals approved a stipulation dismissing an appeal filed by the International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers, Local Union #1 against Quality General, Inc. The appeal concerned an order denying confirmation and enforcement of an arbitration decision and award. The parties agreed to dismiss the appeal with prejudice and bear their own attorneys' fees and costs.
What changed
The court issued an order approving the parties' stipulation to dismiss Appeal No. CAAP-25-0000874 with prejudice. The underlying dispute involved Quality General's motion to confirm and enforce an arbitration award, which was denied by the circuit court. The appellate court dismissed the appeal following the parties' stipulation under HRAP Rule 42(b).
For employers and unions engaged in labor arbitration, this dismissal indicates the parties reached a private resolution. The case underscores the finality of arbitration awards in labor disputes and the binding nature of stipulations filed with the court. Parties should ensure arbitration agreements and award enforcement filings are properly documented to withstand judicial review.
What to do next
- Monitor for updates
Archived snapshot
Apr 8, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-25-0000874 08-APR-2026 08:12 AM Dkt. 30 OAWST
NO. CAAP-25-0000874 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I INTERNATIONAL UNION OF BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS, LOCAL UNION #1 OF HAWAII, AFL-CIO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. QUALITY GENERAL, INC., Respondent-Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CASE NO. 1CSP-25-0000345) ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO DISMISS APPEAL (By: Nakasone, Chief Judge, Wadsworth and Guidry, JJ.)
consideration of the March 27, 2026 Stipulation Upon for Dismissal Under HRAP 42(b) of Appeal from Order Denying Motion to Confirm and Enforce Arbitration Decision and Award, and for Entry of Judgment and Other Relief Filed on September 4, 2025 (Dkt. 1), Filed on November 19, 2025 (Dkt. 42), with Prejudice (Stipulation) filed by Respondent-Appellee Quality General, Inc., the papers in support, and the record, it appears that: (1) the appeal has been docketed; (2) under Rule 42(b) of the Hawai iRules of Appellate Procedure, the parties stipulate to dismiss the appeal and bear their own attorneys' fees and costs; and
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
(3) the stipulation is signed by counsel for all appearing parties. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation is approved and the appeal is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai , April 8, 2026. i /s/ T. Nakasone Karen Chief Judge /s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge /s/ Kimberly T. Guidry Associate Judge
Related changes
Get daily alerts for Hawaii Supreme Court
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from HICA.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when Hawaii Supreme Court publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.