State v. Enk - Criminal Appeal

Oregon Court of Appeals

Filed March 25th, 2026

Detected March 26th, 2026

Summary

The Oregon Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Madeline Marie Enk in State v. Enk. The court's decision, issued on March 25, 2026, follows established precedent and does not introduce new legal interpretations.

View original document View source feed page

What changed

The Oregon Court of Appeals has affirmed the conviction of Madeline Marie Enk in case A185457. The court's disposition, dated March 25, 2026, indicates that the appeal did not present novel legal issues and was resolved by reference to existing case law, specifically State v. Avalos-Lezama.

This ruling signifies the final disposition of the appeal for the defendant. For legal professionals, this case serves as an example of how appellate courts apply precedent in reviewing criminal convictions. No new compliance obligations or deadlines are imposed by this decision.

Source document (simplified)

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

March 25, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

State v. Enk

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Citations: 348 Or. App. 20
Docket Number: A185457
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Disposition: Affirmed. State v. Avalos-Lezama, 346 Or App 604, ___ P3d ___ (2026).
Opinion
Authorities (1)
Cited By (0)
Summaries (0)
Similar Cases (0)
PDF

Disposition

Affirmed. State v. Avalos-Lezama, 346 Or App 604, ___ P3d ___ (2026).

Combined Opinion

20 March 25, 2026 No. 228

This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion
pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited
except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE
STATE OF OREGON

STATE OF OREGON,
Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
MADELINE MARIE ENK,
Defendant-Appellant.
Beaverton Municipal Court
2411023; A185457

Zohra Bakhtary Tourville, Judge.
Submitted March 3, 2026.
Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate
Section, and James Brewer, Deputy Public Defender, Oregon
Public Defense Commission, filed the brief for appellant.
Dan Rayfield, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman,
Interim Deputy Attorney General, and Megan Mizuta,
Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Shorr, Presiding Judge, Powers, Judge, and
O’Connor, Judge.
PER CURIAM
Affirmed. State v. Avalos-Lezama, 346 Or App 604, ___
P3d ___ (2026).