Salt v R - Sentence Appeal Allowed

New Zealand Courts

Filed March 6th, 2026

Detected March 20th, 2026

Summary

The New Zealand Court of Appeal has allowed a sentence appeal in Salt v R, reducing the minimum period of imprisonment from 12 years to 11 years. The court found the original minimum period of imprisonment to be manifestly excessive given the circumstances of the offense and mitigating factors.

View original document View source feed page

What changed

The New Zealand Court of Appeal, in the case of Salt v R ([2026] NZCA 62), has allowed an appeal against sentence. The court set aside the original minimum period of imprisonment (MPI) of 12 years for murder and replaced it with an MPI of 11 years. The appellant argued that the 12-year MPI was manifestly excessive due to an overly high starting point and insufficient consideration of personal mitigating factors.

This decision has direct implications for the appellant, Mr. Salt, by reducing his minimum time of incarceration. For legal professionals and compliance officers dealing with criminal sentencing in New Zealand, this ruling clarifies the court's stance on the proportionality of MPIs in murder cases, particularly concerning the assessment of aggravating factors and the application of discounts for mitigating circumstances. It serves as a precedent for future sentence appeals where the MPI is contested.

What to do next

Review sentencing guidelines for murder cases in light of this precedent.
Assess current MPIs for ongoing cases for potential appeal grounds if deemed excessive.

Penalties

Minimum imprisonment reduced from 12 years to 11 years.

Source document (simplified)

Salt v R -

        [2026] NZCA 62

Date of Judgment

06 March 2026

Decision

[Salt v R

          (PDF

        193 KB)](https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/assets/cases/2026/2026-NZCA-62.pdf)

Summary

Criminal law — Sentence appeal — Murder — Minimum period of imprisonment

The appeal is allowed. The minimum period of imprisonment of 12 years is set aside and replaced with a minimum period of imprisonment of 11 years.

Mr Salt was found guilty by jury of the murder of Tofimua Matagi. He was sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum period of imprisonment (MPI) of 12 years. He appeals his MPI on the basis it is manifestly excessive, as the starting point was too high and insufficient weight was placed on his personal mitigating factors.

Is the MPI of 12 years manifestly excessive? *Held: Yes.***

The starting point of 12 and a half years was manifestly excessive when compared with other similar cases and considering the aggravating factors of the offending. The Judge’s approach to discounts for personal mitigating factors was correct.