Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal Sasaki v. Fukushima - Appeal Dismissed for Lack...
Routine Enforcement Amended Final

Sasaki v. Fukushima - Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Appellate Jurisdiction

Favicon for www.courts.state.hi.us Hawaii Supreme Court
Filed
Detected
Email

Summary

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals dismissed Defendant-Appellant Doreen Fukushima's appeal in Maryann Sasaki v. Doreen Fukushima (CAAP-26-0000191) for lack of appellate jurisdiction. The appellate court determined that the Circuit Court had not entered a final, appealable order or judgment as required by HRS § 641-1(a), and the order denying the motion to recuse was not independently appealable under the collateral order or Forgay doctrines.

Published by Hawaii ICA on courts.state.hi.us . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

What changed

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals dismissed Defendant-Appellant Doreen Fukushima's appeal in Maryann Sasaki v. Doreen Fukushima for lack of appellate jurisdiction. The appellate court found the Circuit Court had not entered a final, appealable order or judgment as required for appellate review under HRS § 641-1(a), Hawaii Rules of Civil Procedure Rules 54(b) and 58, and Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright. The order denying the motion to recuse Judge Cataldo was not independently appealable under the collateral order or Forgay doctrines, and no leave for interlocutory appeal was granted under HRS § 641-1(b).\n\nThis dismissal means the recusal motion ruling remains pending in the Circuit Court and parties must await a final judgment before pursuing appellate remedies. The procedural dismissal does not address the merits of the underlying dispute or the recusal motion.

What to do next

  1. Monitor for updates

Archived snapshot

Apr 14, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-26-0000191 14-APR-2026 07:56 AM Dkt. 13 ODSLJ

NO. CAAP-26-0000191 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I MARYANN SASAKI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DOREEN FUKUSHIMA, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CASE NO. 1CCV-24-0001827) ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION (By: Nakasone, Chief Judge, Wadsworth and Guidry, JJ.) Upon review of the record, it appears that self- represented Defendant-Appellant Doreen Fukushima appeals from a March 9, 2026 "Order Denying Defendant Doreen Fukushima, M.D.'s Motion to Recuse Judge Lisa W. Cataldo Pursuant to Rule 2.11 of the Hawai Revised Code of Judicial Conduct," entered in the i Circuit Court of the First Circuit. The court lacks appellate jurisdiction because the Circuit Court has not entered a final, appealable order or judgment, see Hawai Revised Statutes (HRS) § 641-1(a) (2016); i Hawai i Rules of Civil Procedure Rules 54(b), 58; Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright, 76 Hawai i 115, 119, 869 P.2d 1334, 1338 (1994), and the order appealed-from is not independently appealable under the collateral order or Forgay 1 doctrines, nor has the Circuit Court granted leave to file an interlocutory appeal under HRS § 641-1(b). See Greer v. Baker, 137 Hawai i 249, 253, 369 P.3d 832, 836 (2016) (setting forth the

Forgay v. Conrad, 47 U.S. 201 (1848).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

requirements for appealability under the collateral-order doctrine and the Forgay doctrine); HRS § 641-1(b) (specifying requirements for leave to file interlocutory appeal). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are dismissed.

14, 2026. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, April /s/ Karen T. Nakasone Chief Judge /s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge /s/ Kimberly T. Guidry Associate Judge

Named provisions

HRS § 641-1(a) HRS § 641-1(b) Rule 54(b) Rule 58 Collateral order doctrine Forgay doctrine

Get daily alerts for Hawaii Supreme Court

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from Hawaii ICA.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
Hawaii ICA
Filed
April 14th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor
Document ID
CAAP-26-0000191
Docket
CAAP-26-0000191 1CCV-24-0001827

Who this affects

Applies to
Courts
Industry sector
9211 Government & Public Administration
Activity scope
Appellate review Civil procedure Judicial disqualification
Geographic scope
US-HI US-HI

Taxonomy

Primary area
Judicial Administration
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Civil Rights Judicial Administration

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when Hawaii Supreme Court publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!