Riot Games, Inc. v. Tang Xilin - TTAB Trademark Opposition
Summary
Riot Games, Inc. filed Opposition No. 91304799 with the TTAB against trademark application by Tang Xilin, seeking to block registration. The TTAB issued a Notice of Default on April 10, 2026, after the applicant failed to respond to the opposition. This administrative action may result in the refusal of Tang Xilin's trademark application.
What changed
Riot Games, Inc. filed an opposition proceeding with the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board against Tang Xilin's trademark application. The TTAB subsequently issued a Notice of Default, indicating the applicant failed to respond to the opposition within the required timeframe. The opposition challenges the registration of the applicant's mark on grounds typically including likelihood of confusion or other grounds under the Lanham Act.
Affected parties in TTAB opposition proceedings should ensure timely responses to opposition pleadings to avoid default judgments. Trademark applicants facing opposition must actively defend their applications through the TTAB process, including filing an answer and potentially a counterclaim. Default judgments in TTAB proceedings typically result in the registration being refused and the applicant's rights being limited without further opportunity to contest the opposition.
What to do next
- Monitor for TTAB updates on Opposition No. 91304799
Archived snapshot
Apr 13, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Opposition: Riot Games, Inc. v. Tang Xilin
Opposition TTAB91304799-20260410 Kind: OPP Apr 10, 2026
Abstract
NOTICE OF DEFAULT
Plaintiff: Riot Games, Inc.
Defendant: Tang Xilin
Filing Date
2026-01-28
Named provisions
Related changes
Get daily alerts for TTAB Proceedings
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from USPTO.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when TTAB Proceedings publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.