Orshan et al v. Apple Inc. - Motion Filing and Response Deadlines
Summary
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California docketed multiple filings in the long-pending Orshan et al v. Apple Inc. case. Paul Orshan filed a motion with responses due May 5, 2026 and replies due May 12, 2026. Apple Inc. separately filed a motion for summary judgment with responses due May 4, 2026, along with Daubert motions to exclude plaintiffs' damages and marketing experts, both set for a July 16, 2026 hearing before Judge Edward J. Davila.
“Responses due by 5/4/2026. Replies due by 5/11/2”
What changed
The docket shows two competing motion filings. Paul Orshan filed a motion on April 21, 2026 with a response deadline of May 5, 2026 and reply deadline of May 12, 2026. Separately, Apple Inc. filed a motion for summary judgment with supporting declarations and Daubert motions to exclude two of plaintiffs' experts (Dr. Andreas Groehn on damages and Larry Steven Londre on marketing). Apple also filed administrative motions to seal portions of its summary judgment and Daubert filings.\n\nFor legal practitioners monitoring this case, the competing motion deadlines (May 4 and May 5, 2026) and the July 16, 2026 hearing date before Judge Davila indicate the case is progressing toward potential resolution. The sealing requests suggest confidential financial or technical information remains disputed. The 11-year case history (filed December 2014) and active expert challenge practice are consistent with complex civil litigation.
Archived snapshot
Apr 21, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Orshan et al v. Apple Inc.
Case Number: 5:14-cv-05659-EJD Judge: Davila, Edward J. Location: San Jose Case Type: Civil Case Basis: Federal Question Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions Date Filed:
December 30, 2014
Last Filing Date:
April 20, 2026
View Publicly Available Documents Case Summary No summary of this case is available
Recent Filings
| Date Filed | Docket Number | Document Description |
|---|---|---|
| 04-21-26 | 297 | MOTION filed by Paul Orshan. Responses due by 5/5/2026. Replies due by 5/12/2026. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit, # (2) Exhibit, # (3) Exhibit, # (4) Exhibit)(Smith, Thom) |
| 04-21-26 | 298 | CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Paul Orshan re [294] Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Material Should Be Sealed PLAINTIFFS ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF |
| 04-20-26 | 287 | MOTION for Summary Judgment (Redacted) filed by Apple Inc.. Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing set for 7/16/2026 09:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor before Judge Edward J. Davila. Responses due by 5/4/2026. Replies due by 5/11/2 |
| 04-20-26 | 288 | MOTION To Exclude Plaintiffs' Damages Expert Andreas Groehn filed by Apple Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 7/16/2026 09:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor before Judge Edward J. Davila. Responses due by 5/18/2026. Replies due |
| 04-20-26 | 289 | MOTION To Exclude Plaintiffs' Marketing Expert Larry Steven Londre filed by Apple Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 7/16/2026 09:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor before Judge Edward J. Davila. Responses due by 5/18/2026. Repl |
| 04-20-26 | 290 | Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Portions of Its Motion For Summary Judgment; Daubert Motions To Exclude Plaintiffs' Marketing Expert Larry Steven Londre And Plaintiffs' Damages Expert Dr. Andreas Groehn; and Certain Documents |
| 04-20-26 | 291 | Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Material Should Be Sealed filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Proposed Order, # (2) Exhibit M (Sealed), # (3) Exhibit P (Sealed))(Powers, Matthew) |
| 04-20-26 | 292 | Declaration of Matthew D. Powers in Support of [287] MOTION for Summary Judgment (Redacted), [290] Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Portions of Its Motion For Summary Judgment; Daubert Motions To Exclude Plaintiffs' M |
| 04-20-26 | 293 | Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Material Should Be Sealed PLAINTIFFS ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF PROFESSOR DAVID I. AUGUST SHOULD BE SEALED f |
| 04-20-26 | 294 | Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Material Should Be Sealed PLAINTIFFS ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF PROFESSOR JUSTIN MCCRARY SHOULD BE SEALED fi |
| 04-20-26 | 295 | CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Apple Inc. re [290] Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Portions of Its Motion For Summary Judgment; Daubert Motions To Exclude Plaintiffs' Marketing Expert Larry Steven Londre And Plaintiffs' Damages |
| 04-20-26 | 296 | MOTION filed by Paul Orshan. Responses due by 5/4/2026. Replies due by 5/11/2026. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit, # (2) Exhibit, # (3) Exhibit, # (4) Exhibit, # (5) Exhibit)(Smith, Thom) |
Parties
Related changes
Get daily alerts for NDCA Recently Filed Documents
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from NDCA.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when NDCA Recently Filed Documents publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.