Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal PACE Calls for Magnitsky Case Accountability, R...
Priority review Notice Added Final

PACE Calls for Magnitsky Case Accountability, Reversal of Burden of Proof

Favicon for www.coe.int Council of Europe News
Published
Detected
Email

Summary

The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe passed a resolution on April 23, 2026 calling for accountability in the Sergei Magnitsky case, in which a Russian tax adviser uncovered a US$230 million fraud involving corrupt officials and criminal networks linked to the Russian Treasury. The Assembly urged European states to reverse the burden of proof for unexplained wealth and to consider imposing targeted 'Magnitsky sanctions' such as visa bans and asset freezes against those responsible for serious human rights violations. Switzerland was specifically criticised for returning seized funds to three Russian citizens with established links to the Russian state apparatus.

Published by PACE on coe.int . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

About this source

GovPing monitors Council of Europe News for new courts & legal regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 21 changes logged to date.

What changed

The Parliamentary Assembly adopted a resolution calling on Council of Europe member and observer states to introduce or expand non-conviction-based confiscation, specifically by reversing the burden of proof regarding the origin of unexplained wealth, and to review the application of proportional confiscation methods. States were also encouraged to consider imposing targeted Magnitsky sanctions against those believed responsible for or benefiting from serious human rights violations.\n\nAffected parties include member state governments, judicial authorities, and financial institutions that may face enhanced scrutiny regarding assets linked to Russian state-connected individuals. While the resolution is non-binding and represents a political rather than legal commitment, it signals the direction of European human rights accountability policy and may inform future national legislation on sanctions and asset recovery.

Archived snapshot

Apr 23, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

Parliamentary Assembly calls for accountability in the Sergei Magnitsky case

European states called on to reverse the burden of proof in cases of unexplained wealth

Bertrand Bouyx from France, presiding over a debate. The Parliamentary Assembly gathers elected representatives from across the continent

The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe has passed a resolution, calling for those responsible for the death of Sergei Magnitsky, as well as the beneficiaries of the fraud he uncovered to be held accountable.

Mr Magnitsky, a Russian tax adviser and auditor, uncovered a US$230 million fraud involving corrupt officials and criminal networks linked to the Russian Treasury. In retaliation, he was arrested, subjected to inhuman and degrading treatment, and denied medical care. He died in a Moscow prison in 2009. In its 2019 judgment, the European Court of Human Rights found multiple human-rights violations in his case.

Why has Mr Magnitsky’s case not been resolved?

Passing a resolution based on a report by Lesia Vasylenko (Ukraine, ALDE), the Assembly highlighted that all criminal cases in Russia against officials involved in Mr Magnitsky’s ill-treatment have been closed, with no one held to account, while he himself was posthumously convicted of tax evasion.

“The proceeds of the crime exposed by Mr Magnitsky were laundered through a complex network, potentially involving waystations in several states ” in Europe and beyond, the parliamentarians said. They welcomed the fact that in five Council of Europe member or observer states, investigations had resulted in convictions, settlements and/or confiscations of the proceeds of crime (France, Latvia, Netherlands, Switzerland and the United States), but regretted that in several others the proceedings had not led to any conclusions, convictions or confiscations so far.

Concerning Switzerland, the Parliamentary Assembly deeply regretted that the funds initially seized there “will return to the disposal of three Russian citizens with established links to the Russian state apparatus”, after the Swiss judicial authorities concluded that the money laundering could not be considered the work of a criminal organisation. It also regretted that the investigation had been “overshadowed by serious allegations that Swiss officials involved in the investigation accepted undue favours from high-ranking Russian officials and oligarchs”. While these allegations led to the conviction of one investigator, the Swiss authorities found that his conduct had no impact on the investigation or its findings.

The Parliamentary Assembly invited Switzerland and other member states to “introduce or expand the use of non-conviction-based confiscation, in particular by reversing the burden of proof as to the origin of unexplained wealth ”, and to review the application of the “proportional confiscation” method. States that have not yet done so should also consider imposing targeted sanctions (“ Magnitsky sanctions ”), such as visa bans and asset freezes, against those reasonably believed to be responsible for or to benefit from serious human rights violations.

Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe

Image Gallery

×

Parliamentary Assembly session Strasbourg 23 April 2026
- Diminuer la taille du texte
- Augmenter la taille du texte
- Imprimer la page

2026-04-23T07:29:00

-

  • en-GB

-


Related news
- Twitter
- Facebook
- LinkedIn
- Email

Chairperson of the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina reaffirms commitment to Council of Europe values

Parliamentary Assembly session 22 April 2026 Strasbourg Denis Bećirović warns Parliamentary Assembly that constitutional order of Bosnia and Herzegovina was being undermined

Read More


The Week Ahead: Key Events and Meetings



resources
- Media Department
- Week Ahead
- Calendar
- Speeches
- New Democratic Pact for Europe
- Council of Europe Summit, May 2023
- Contribution to UN 2030 agenda
- Theme files
- Photo galleries
- Video on demand


for the press

Accreditations

Press releases

To receive our press releases

Guide for visiting journalists

Media contacts

European Court of Human Rights RSS feeds


follow us

Named provisions

Non-conviction-based confiscation Reversing the burden of proof Magnitsky sanctions

Get daily alerts for Council of Europe News

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from PACE.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
PACE
Published
April 23rd, 2026
Instrument
Notice
Branch
International
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor

Who this affects

Applies to
Government agencies Financial advisers Investors
Industry sector
9211 Government & Public Administration
Activity scope
Human rights advocacy Sanctions recommendations Asset recovery policy
Geographic scope
European Union EU

Taxonomy

Primary area
Human Rights
Operational domain
Compliance
Compliance frameworks
OFAC Sanctions
Topics
Sanctions Anti-Money Laundering International Trade

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when Council of Europe News publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!