Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal Nisha Chandola vs Manoj Sharma - Perjury Procee...
Priority review Enforcement Added Final

Nisha Chandola vs Manoj Sharma - Perjury Proceedings

Favicon for indiankanoon.org India Delhi High Court
Filed March 24th, 2026
Detected March 24th, 2026
Email

Summary

The Delhi High Court is considering initiating perjury proceedings against Defendant No. 1 in the case of Nisha Chandola & Anr vs Manoj Sharma And Anr. The application seeks to prosecute the defendant for allegedly making false statements on oath in court pleadings and affidavits related to a partition suit.

What changed

The Delhi High Court has a pending application (CRL.M.A. 6275/2026) filed under Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, seeking to initiate perjury proceedings against Defendant No. 1. The application alleges that the defendant deliberately made false statements in his pleadings and affidavits dated 03.09.2025 and 15.01.2026, with the intent to obstruct justice. These statements were made in the context of a civil suit (CS(OS) 246/2023) concerning partition, rendition of accounts, and recovery of amounts due from the defendants, who are the children of the deceased Ram Chander Sharma.

This action signifies a potential criminal prosecution for contempt of court and false swearing. Legal professionals involved in the case must be aware of the allegations and the court's scrutiny of sworn statements. The court is actively considering whether to proceed with the perjury charges, which could have significant implications for the defendant and set a precedent for the integrity of judicial proceedings. The outcome of this application will determine the next steps in the criminal aspect of the case, separate from the ongoing civil suit.

What to do next

  1. Review court filings for accuracy and truthfulness
  2. Ensure all affidavits and pleadings are supported by verifiable facts
  3. Consult legal counsel regarding potential perjury implications

Penalties

Perjury proceedings can lead to criminal prosecution and penalties as prescribed under the law.

Source document (simplified)

## Unlock Advanced Research with PRISM AI

Integrated with over 4 crore judgments and laws — designed for legal practitioners, researchers, students and institutions

Nisha Chandola & Anr vs Manoj Sharma And Anr on 24 March, 2026

Author: Subramonium Prasad

Bench: Subramonium Prasad

  •  IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                                                              Date of decision: 24th MARCH, 2026
                             IN THE MATTER OF:
                             CRL.M.A. 6275/2026
                             IN
                      +      CS(OS) 246/2023
                             NISHA CHANDOLA & ANR                                      ......Plaintiffs
                                                Through:     In person.
    
                                                versus
    
                             MANOJ SHARMA AND ANR                    ......Defendants
                                         Through: Ms. Shruti Kapur, Advocate for D-1.
    
                             CORAM:
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
                                                JUDGMENT CRL.M.A. 6275/2026
    
  1. The instant application is filed under [Section 340](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/908644/) of the Criminal
                      Procedure Code, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as " [CrPC](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/445276/) ") for initiation of
                      perjury proceedings against the Defendant No. 1 for making false statements
                      on oath.
    
  2. The present suit is one for partition, rendition of accounts and
                      recovery of amounts due to the Plaintiffs from the Defendants.
    
  3. The facts of the case, as mentioned in the Plaint, reveal that the
                      Parties are the children of one Late Ram Chander Sharma, who died
                      intestate on 28.04.2022. The Petitioners and Defendant No. 2 herein are the
                      daughters of the deceased, whereas the Defendant No. 1 is the son of the
                      deceased. It is stated that during his lifetime, the deceased acquired various Signature Not Verified Signed By:PRATEEK         CS(OS) 246/2023                                                  Page 1 of 10 Signing Date:24.03.2026 15:47:31 movable and immovable properties, which are mentioned in Paragraph No.
                      3 of the Plaint. The Plaintiffs, raising apprehensions of Defendant No. 1
                      misappropriating money from the suit properties, filed the instant suit
                      seeking partition in all the properties mentioned in the Suit Schedule.
    
  4. The instant application was listed on 25.02.2026. Petitioner No. 1 was
                      appearing in-person before this Court via Video Conferencing.
    
  5. On the said date, this Court puts a pointed question to the Petitioner
                      No. 1 as to why the criminal proceedings under [Section 340](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/908644/) of the CrPC are
                      to be initiated against the Defendant No. 1. Upon this query, the Petitioner
                      No. 1 submits that the Defendant No. 1 had deliberatively given false
                      statements in his pleadings as well as the affidavits dated 03.09.2025 and
                      15.01.2026 with an intent to interfere with the administration of justice. It is
                      stated that the statements made by the Defendant No. 1 before this Court via
                      affidavits dated 03.09.2025 and 15.01.2026 are backed by only forged
                      documentation, thereby revealing his intent to deceive this Court.
    
  6. Per contra, learned Counsel for the Defendant No. 1 vehemently
                      objected to the present application, thereby stating that the application is
                      frivolous in nature.
    
  7. Heard learned Counsel for the parties and perused the material on
                      record.
    
  8. It is observed that on 15.07.2025, this Court directed the Defendant
                      No. 1 to file an affidavit disclosing all the assets received by the Defendant
                      No. 1 by transfer upon the demise of the father. It further directed the
                      Plaintiff to file the Joint Schedule of Properties, which is also on record.
    
  9. The affidavit dated 03.09.2025 reads as under:-
    

"1. That I am the Defendant No. 1 in the above Signature Not Verified Signed By:PRATEEK CS(OS) 246/2023 Page 2 of 10 Signing Date:24.03.2026 15:47:31 captioned matter. I am well conversant with the facts
and circumstances of this - case. As such, I am
competent to swear and depose this Affidavit.

1That the present Affidavit is being filed in terms of
Order dated 15.07.2025 passed by this Hon'ble Court
wherein this Hon'ble Court directed the deponent to
make a full disclosure of the estate inherited by him
from his father, Late Sh. Ramesh Chandra Sharma.

  1. IMMOVABLE PROPERTIES

A. 36, Sharad Cooperative Building Society,
Karkardooma, Delhi 110092 admeasuring 177.80 sq.
yds.

i. That the said property was purchased by Late Sh.
Ramesh Chandra Sharma vide registered Conveyance
Deed dated 17.06.1994.

ii. That the deponent has inherited the said property
consisting of a ground floor, first floor and second
floor, vide Will dated 25.06.2021 executed by Late Sh.
Ramesh Chandra Sharma.

iii. The deponent has duly disclosed the
aforementioned facts at paragraph 11(a) of the Written
Statement dated 11.08.2023.

B. 28, Second Floor, Sharad Vihar, Karkarsdooma,
Delhi 110092.

i. That the said property was purchased by Late Sh.
Ramesh Chandra Sharma in the year 2016.

ii. That the deponent has inherited the said property
vide Will dated 25.06.2021 executed by Late Sh.
Ramesh Chandra Sharma.

iii. The deponent has duly disclosed the
aforementioned facts at paragraph 11 (b) of the Signature Not Verified Signed By:PRATEEK CS(OS) 246/2023 Page 3 of 10 Signing Date:24.03.2026 15:47:31 Written Statement dated 11.08.2023.

C. Industrial land bearing plot no. 249, FIE
Patparganj admeasuring 367.50 sq. meters.

i. That the said property was purchased by Late Sh.
Ramesh Chandra Sharma vide lease deed dated
06.08.19991 which got converted to freehold vide
registered Conveyance Deed dated 24.12.2008 in the
name of the father.

ii. That the father had gotten construction done on the
said property and thereafter bought plant and
machinery.

iii. That the said property was used for running the
business in New Samudra Art Centre by Late Sh.
Ramesh Chandra Sharma and the deponent until 2020
when it was shut down.

iv. That the plant and machinery in the said property
has become obsolete since then and are scrap.

v. That the deponent has inherited the said property
vide Will dated 25.06.2021 executed by Late Sh.
Ramesh Chandra Sharma.

vi. The deponent has duly disclosed the aforementioned
facts at paragraph 11 (c) of the Written Statement
dated 11.08.2023.

D. Property bearing no. B-119, Sector 63, Noida,
Gautam Budh Nagar, UP 201301.

i. That the said property is admittedly owned by the
company namely M/s Ambika Garments Pvt. Ltd. and
the said company is not a party in the present suit. As
such, no relief can be granted qua the assets of the
company.

  1. The deponent has duly disclosed the Signature Not Verified Signed By:PRATEEK CS(OS) 246/2023 Page 4 of 10 Signing Date:24.03.2026 15:47:31 aforementioned facts at paragraph 11(e) of the Written
    Statement dated 11.08.2023.

  2. MOVABLE PROPERTIES

i. Late Sh. Ramesh Chandra Sharma held a Savings
Bank Account with the Bank of Baroda.

ii. As on the date of demise of Late Sh. Ramesh
Chandra Sharma, the amount in savings bank account
was Rs. 24,87,163.03/- (Rupees Twenty-Four Lakhs
Eighty Seven Thousand One Hundred and Sixty-Three
point Zero Three only).

iii. Late Sh. Ramesh Chandra Sharma also held fixed
deposits with the Bank of Baroda amounting to a sum
of Rs. 15,23,96,853/- (Rupees Fifteen Crores
TwentyThree Lakhs Ninety-Six Thousand Eight-
Hundred and Fifty-Three only) with the following
account nos.

00980300017704;00980300017705;00980300020186;
00980300021382;00980300021651;00980300021654;
00980300023307; 00980300024152; 0980300024153;
00980300024154;00980300024562;00980300024836;
00980300025251;00980300025252.

iv. Late Sh. Ramesh Chandra Sharma had applied for
an overdraft facility for New Samudra Art Centre of
approximately Rs. 1.5 crores for which Rs. 95-97 lakhs
were in use and had to be paid for post his demise.

v. The deponent was made a nominee by Late Sh.
Ramesh Chandra Sharma in the FDs in the Bank of
Baroda Account.

vi. That the deponent has inherited the aforementioned
sums vide Will dated 25.06.2021 executed by Late Sh.
Ramesh Chandra Sharma. The same have been
transferred to the deponent in terms of the Will in or
around October/November, 2022.
Signature Not Verified Signed By:PRATEEK CS(OS) 246/2023 Page 5 of 10 Signing Date:24.03.2026 15:47:31
vii. The deponent has duly disclosed the
aforementioned facts at paragraph 11(f-g) of the
Written Statement dated 11.08.2023.

C. Mutual Funds

i. That Late Sh. Ramesh Chandra Sharma had mutual
funds wherein he had made the deponent a nominee.

  1. That the value of the mutual funds on the date of
    his demise was Rs. 1,04,66,967/- (Rupees One Crore
    Four Lakhs Sixty-Six Thousand Nine-Hundred and
    Sixty Seven only).

  2. That the deponent has inherited the
    aforementioned sums vide Will dated 25.06.2021
    executed by Late Sh. Ramesh Chandra Sharma.

iv. The said sums were directly received by the
deponent on 05.12.2022 in terms of the Will.

v. The deponent has duly disclosed the aforementioned
facts at paragraph 11 (f-g) of the Written Statement
dated 11.08.2023.

D. Besides the aforesaid, Late Sh. Ramesh Chandra
Sharma has left behind one car and household items at
36, Sharad Vihar, Karkardooma, Delhi.

  1. That the Plaintiff has alleged that Late Sh. Ramesh
    Chandra Sharma also had a life insurance policy in his
    name. It is stated that Late Sh. Ramesh Chandra
    Sharma had taken on a life insurance policy in the
    name of Mr. Aditya Khanduri, son of the deponent,
    who is the beneficiary of the said policy. The insured
    sums have been transferred to the deponent on behalf
    of his son Mr. Aditya Khanduri in October, 2023. The
    Plaintiffs have no right, title or interest in the said
    policy as per law. Copy of India First Money Balance
    Plan taken in the name of Mr. Aditya Khanduri is
    annexed as Document-A. Signature Not Verified Signed By:PRATEEK CS(OS) 246/2023 Page 6 of 10 Signing Date:24.03.2026 15:47:31

  2. Further, it is stated that the deponent has not
    received any asset of Late Sh. Ramesh Chandra
    Shanna prior to his demise on 28.04.2022."

  3. Thereafter, an application bearing IA No. 28016/2025 was filed by the
    Plaintiff No. 1 stating that the Defendant No. 1 has not complied with the
    Order dated 15.07.2025, by not disclosing the bank accounts and financial
    investments of M/s Ambika Garments Pvt. Ltd. Vide Order dated
    12.11.2025, this Court directed the Defendant No. 1 to file an additional
    affidavit disclosing the same.

  1. Accordingly, an additional affidavit dated 15.01.2026 has been filed by the Defendant No.1, which reads as under:-

"1. That I am the Defendant No. 1 in the above
captioned matter. I am well conversant with the facts
and circumstances of this case. As such, I am
competent to swear and depose this Affidavit.

  1. That the present Affidavit is being filed in terms of
    Order dated 12.11.2025 and 01.12.2025 passed by this
    Hon'ble Court wherein this Hon 'ble Court directed the
    deponent to make a disclosure of the bank accounts
    and financial investments of M/s Ambika Garments
    Pvt. Ltd. in terms of Order dated 15.07.2025.

  2. At the outset, it is stated that the deponent has not
    inherited the assets of M/s Ambika Garments Pvt. Ltd.
    from his father Late Sh. Ramesh Chandra Sharma nor
    has the same been transferred, as required under order
    dated 15.07.2025. As such, the Plaintiffs have made
    false statements that the deponent had to disclose bank
    accounts and financial investments of M/s Ambika
    Garments Pvt. Ltd.

  3. The deponent has inherited 70% of the shares owned
    by Late Sh. Ramesh Chandra Sharma in M/s Ambika
    Garments Pvt. Ltd. by way of Will dated 25.06.2021 Signature Not Verified Signed By:PRATEEK CS(OS) 246/2023 Page 7 of 10 Signing Date:24.03.2026 15:47:31 executed by Late Sh. Ramesh Chandra Sharma. The
    said shares were transferred to the deponent in
    September, 2022 and has been disclosed by the
    deponent at paragraph 11 (e) of the Written Statement
    dated 11.08.2023 and paragraph 4(A) of the Affidavit
    dated 03.09.2025.

  4. That M/s Ambika Garments Pvt. Ltd. owns one
    immovable property bearing no. B-119, Sector 63,
    Noida, Gautam Budh Nagar, UP 201301. The said
    property continues to be owned by M/s Ambika
    Garments Pvt. Ltd. which is not a party to the present
    suit. As such, no relief can be granted qua the
    immovable property of the company.

  5. Further, M/s Ambika Garments Pvt. Ltd. has one (1)
    bank account bearing Account No. 28407630000506
    with HDFC Bank, Patparganj Industrial Area, Plot
    No. 12, New Delhi 110092. As on the death of Late Sh.
    Ramesh Chandra Sharma, a sum of Rs. 8,020,719.47/-
    (Rupees Eighty Lakhs Twenty-Thousand Seven
    Hundred and Nineteen point Four Seven only) was
    remaining as balance. The said bank account account
    continues to be owned by M/s Ambika Garments Pvt.
    Ltd. which is not a party to the present suit. As such, no
    relief can be granted qua the bank account of the
    Company.

  6. That without prejudice, the Defendant No. 1 is filing
    the bank statement of M/s Ambika Garments Pvt. Ltd.
    from 28.04.2021 to 28.04.2022 (i.e., one year prior to
    the death of the father). Copy of bank statement of M/s
    Ambika Garments Pvt. Ltd. from 28.04.2021 to
    28.04.2022 is annexed as Document- I.

  7. That Mis Ambika Garments Pvt. Ltd. does not have
    any other immovable or movable asset as on the date
    of demise of the father besides as disclosed above."

  8. A bare reading of the contents of the instant application reveals that Signature Not Verified Signed By:PRATEEK CS(OS) 246/2023 Page 8 of 10 Signing Date:24.03.2026 15:47:31 the Plaintiff No.1 has merely alleged the correctness of the details
    mentioned in the affidavits filed by the Defendant No. 1. The Plaintiff No.1
    has only pointed out at certain contradictions between the affidavits and the
    material on record. In the opinion of this Court, the allegations per se cannot
    attract the ingredients under Section 340 of the CrPC which prescribes for
    initiation of an inquiry into an offence under Section 195(1)(b) of the CrPC. Section 195(1)(b) of the CrPC deals with prosecution of offences relating to
    documents given in evidence, i.e., the offences punishable under Section
    193
    to 196, 199, 200, 205 to 211, 228, 463, 471, 475, 476 of the IPC. In the
    opinion of this Court, these offences are not made out at this juncture.

  1. The falsity of the statements made in the affidavits will have to be
    established in the present trial. In the opinion of this Court, it is always open
    for the Plaintiffs to initiate proceedings under Section 340 of the CrPC if
    material surfaces during the course of the trial. This Court is not inclined to
    initiate parallel proceedings one under Section 340 of the CrPC and one
    under the present suit for ascertaining the correctness or otherwise of the
    additional affidavits filed in this Court at this juncture.

  2. This Court is observing that now a practice has been made by the
    parties of filing applications under Section 340 of the CrPC only with an
    idea of arm-twisting the other side or putting pressure and also to delay the
    trial. Since the Plaintiff No.1 is appearing in person, this Court is not
    inclined to impose any costs on the Applicant/ Plaintiff No.1 for filing this
    application. However, liberty is granted to the Applicant/ Plaintiff No.1 to
    file the same in case material surfaces that offences punishable under Section 193 to 196, 199, 200, 205 to 211, 228, 463, 471, 475, 476 of the IPC
    have been committed attracting Section 195 of the CrPC, which will lead to Signature Not Verified Signed By:PRATEEK CS(OS) 246/2023 Page 9 of 10 Signing Date:24.03.2026 15:47:31 initiation of proceedings under Section 340 of the CrPC. The instant
    application is filed only with an intent to derail this Court from proceeding
    further with the matter and also to harass the Defendant No. 1.

  3. Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed.

CS(OS) 246/2023

  1. List on 04.08.2026.

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
MARCH 24, 2026
SM Signature Not Verified Signed By:PRATEEK CS(OS) 246/2023 Page 10 of 10 Signing Date:24.03.2026 15:47:31

Named provisions

Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
GP
Filed
March 24th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Substantive
Document ID
CS(OS) 246/2023

Who this affects

Applies to
Legal professionals
Activity scope
Perjury Proceedings Civil Litigation
Geographic scope
IN IN

Taxonomy

Primary area
Judicial Administration
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Criminal Procedure Civil Litigation

Get Courts & Legal alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when India Delhi High Court publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.