USPTO PTAB Adds New IPR, CBM, and PGR Decisions
Summary
The USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has added new decisions for Inter Partes Review (IPR), Covered Business Method (CBM), and Post-Grant Review (PGR) proceedings. These include final written decisions for cases involving Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v California Institute of Technology and Google LLC v Ericsson AB, as well as 'Settled After Institution' decisions.
What changed
The USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has updated its daily decisions page to include new filings and final written decisions for various patent review proceedings, specifically Inter Partes Review (IPR), Covered Business Method (CBM), and Post-Grant Review (PGR). Notable cases highlighted include final written decisions for Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v California Institute of Technology and Google LLC v Ericsson AB, and 'Settled After Institution' decisions for Apple Inc. v Advanced Coding Technologies LLC. The listed decision dates are in the future (2026-03-23), suggesting these are scheduled decisions or a data entry anomaly.
This update primarily serves as an informational notice for parties involved in or monitoring these PTAB proceedings. Legal professionals and companies involved in patent litigation should review these decisions to understand PTAB's current stance on patentability challenges. While no immediate compliance actions are required for entities not directly involved in these specific cases, staying informed about PTAB decisions is crucial for managing patent portfolios and potential litigation risks.
What to do next
- Review new PTAB decisions for relevance to ongoing or potential patent litigation.
- Monitor PTAB case law for trends in patentability challenges.
Source document (simplified)
Page: PTAB Daily Decisions (Current Day)
Change summary: New PTAB IPR, CBM, and PGR proceedings have been added, including final written decisions for cases like Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v California Institute of Technology and Google LLC v Ericsson AB, as well as 'Settled After Institution' decisions for Apple Inc. v Advanced Coding Technologies LLC.
[INSERTS] New PTAB IPR, CBM, and PGR proceedings added. Includes decisions like 'Final Written Decision' for cases such as Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v California Institute of Technology and Google LLC v Ericsson AB, and 'Settled After Institution' for Apple Inc. v Advanced Coding Technologies LLC.
Page context:
About Us | Jobs
| Contact Us
| MyUSPTO
Patents | Trademarks
| IP Policy
| Learning and Resources
Find It Fast
Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Completed IPR, CBM, and PGR Proceedings
| AIA Case # | Case Caption | Decision Status | Decision Date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| IPR2024-01451 | Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v California Institute of Technology | Final Written Decision | 2026-03-23 |
| IPR2025-01103 | Apple Inc. v Advanced Coding Technologies LLC | Settled After Institution | 2026-03-23 |
| DER2023-00012 | Rasmussen, Jon v Holmberg, Aaron | Settled Before Institution | 2026-03-23 |
| IPR2025-00003 | Google LLC v Ericsson AB | Final Written Decision | 2026-03-23 |
| IPR2025-00004 | Google LLC v Ericsson AB | Final Written Decision | 2026-03-23 |
5 results found in date range from 03/20/2026 at 04:00 PM ET to 03/23/2026 at 04:00 PM ET
Share this page
Print this page
Additional information about this page
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Courts & Legal alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when PTAB Daily Decisions (Current Day) publishes new changes.