Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal Guerra v. Lewis - Case Remanded by Georgia Cour...
Priority review Enforcement Amended Final

Guerra v. Lewis - Case Remanded by Georgia Court of Appeals

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com GA Court of Appeals Opinions
Filed March 19th, 2026
Detected March 19th, 2026
Email

Summary

The Georgia Court of Appeals has remanded the case of Guerra v. Lewis. The appellate court is reviewing the trial court's decision to grant a supersedeas bond of over $4 million and the subsequent handling of the appellant's affidavit of indigence. The court's order addresses procedural issues related to the appeal process and the determination of indigency.

What changed

The Georgia Court of Appeals has remanded the case of Michelle Guerra v. Donna Lewis, involving a jury verdict of over $3 million. The remand stems from disputes over the trial court's granting of a supersedeas bond for over $4 million and the appellant's subsequent filing of an affidavit of indigence. The appellate court noted that the trial court had not yet ruled on the motion to traverse the affidavit of indigence before the appeal was docketed, and the appellant's affidavit of indigence filed with the appellate court indicated no ruling had been made.

This case highlights critical procedural steps in appeals involving significant monetary judgments and claims of indigence. Regulated entities, particularly legal professionals involved in litigation, should monitor the proceedings to understand how the court resolves the traverse to the affidavit of indigence and the implications for posting supersedeas bonds. The court's decision on these matters will clarify the application of OCGA § 9-15-2 regarding indigency and the appellate process in Georgia.

What to do next

  1. Review the court's upcoming ruling on the traverse to the affidavit of indigence.
  2. Monitor the resolution of the supersedeas bond issue in the remanded case.

Source document (simplified)

Jump To

Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project
, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

March 19, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

MICHELLE GUERRA v. DONNA LEWIS

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Disposition

Remanded

Combined Opinion

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________
March 19, 2026
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A26A0320. GUERRA v. LEWIS et al.
Following trial, a jury rendered a verdict in favor of Appellees and
awarded them over $3 million in damages. On January 27, 2025, the trial court
entered judgment, affirming the jury’s verdict and award, and several months
later, the court denied Appellant’s motion for new trial. Subsequently,
Appellant filed a motion for new trial, and Appellees filed a motion requesting
that Appellant post a supersedeas bond in the amount of $4,031,000.00, which
the trial court granted.
Thereafter, on June 19, 2025, the trial court denied Appellant’s motion
for new trial. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on July 16, 2025, and on the same
day, rather than posting the bond, Appellant filed a notice of filing an affidavit
of indigence. Appellees then filed a motion to traverse the affidavit of indigence,
arguing it was materially false and filed to mislead the trial court. The trial court
scheduled a hearing on the matter, but on September 2, 2025, the appeal was
docketed in this Court. Afterward, it appears the trial court conducted a hearing
on September 12, 2025, but the record includes no order resolving Appellees’
motion. Indeed, Appellant’s affidavit of indigency filed in this Court states that
the trial court had yet to issue a ruling on the matter.
On October 17, 2025, Appellees filed a traverse to Appellant’s affidavit of
indigency in this Court, requesting that we deny Appellant’s request to proceed
in forma pauperis on appeal. OCGA § 9-15-2(a)(1) provides:
When any party, plaintiff or defendant, in any action or proceeding
held in any court in this state is unable to pay any deposit, fee, or
other cost which is normally required in the court, if the party shall
subscribe an affidavit to the effect that because of his indigence he
is unable to pay the costs, the party shall be relieved from paying the
costs and his rights shall be the same as if he had paid the costs.
Subsection (a)(2) then continues:
Any other party at interest or his agent or attorney may contest the
truth of an affidavit of indigence by verifying affirmatively under
oath that the same is untrue. The issue thereby formed shall be
heard and determined by the court, under the rules of the court.
The judgment of the court on all issues of fact concerning the ability
of a party to pay costs or give bond shall be final.

Importantly, we have held that “the proper forum for determining the truth of
a pauper’s affidavit is in the trial court, not in this court.” Mitchell v. Cancer
CarePoint, Inc., 299 Ga. App. 881, 882–83(1) (683 SE2d 923) (2009) (quotation
marks omitted). And under “OCGA §§ 5-6-47(b) and 9-15-2(a)(2), a trial courts
ruling regarding indigency is final and not subject to appellate review.” Id. at
883(1).
In this matter, however, although it held a hearing on issue of Appellant’s
indigency, it does not appear that the trial court entered an order on that issue.
Given that this Court is not the proper forum to make a determination regarding
that issue, we must remand this case to the trial court. Cf. Lee v. Batchelor, 345
Ga. App. 559, 560–61 (814 SE2d 416) (2018) (remanding case to trial court for
an evidentiary determination on the question of appellant’s claim of indigence).
Accordingly, we DENY Appellees’ traverse to Appellant’s affidavit of
indigency but remand this case to the trial court for a determination on that
issue.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office
Atlanta,____________________
03/19/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Named provisions

Disposition Combined Opinion

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
GA Courts
Filed
March 19th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Substantive
Document ID
A26A0320

Who this affects

Applies to
Legal professionals
Activity scope
Appellate Procedure
Threshold
Supersedeas bond in the amount of $4,031,000.00
Geographic scope
US-GA US-GA

Taxonomy

Primary area
Judicial Administration
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Appellate Procedure Indigence Affidavits Supersedeas Bonds

Get Courts & Legal alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when GA Court of Appeals Opinions publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.