Micaiah Lufcy v. Sarah Lufcy N/K/A Sarah Tolfa
Summary
The Fifth District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed a Circuit Court ruling in a domestic relations case between Micaiah Lufcy and Sarah Lufcy (n/k/a Sarah Tolfa). The appellate court, per curiam, upheld the lower court's decision without issuing a written opinion explaining its reasoning. All three participating justices concurred.
What changed
The appellate court affirmed the lower circuit court ruling in this domestic relations matter without providing written analysis or explanation. The per curiam disposition indicates the panel found no reversible error warranting detailed discussion.
For affected parties in domestic relations cases, this affirmance means the lower court's order remains in full force. Litigants considering appeals should note that per curiam affirmances without opinion provide no precedential guidance on the legal issues raised, limiting the precedential value of this disposition for future cases.
Archived snapshot
Apr 21, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Jump To
Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
April 21, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
Micaiah Lufcy v. Sarah Lufcy N/K/A Sarah Tolfa
District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Citations: None known
- Docket Number: 5D2025-1361
Disposition: Affirmed
Disposition
Affirmed
Combined Opinion
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 5D2025-1361
L.T. Case No. 2014-DR-000836-02D-W
MICAIAH LUFCY,
Appellant,
v.
SARAH LUFCY (N/K/A TOLFA),
Appellee.
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County.
Susan Stacy, Judge.
Theodore F. Greene III, of the Law Offices of Theodore F. Greene,
LC, Orlando, for Appellant.
Michael M. Brownlee and Grace M. Zogaib, of the Brownlee Law
Firm, Orlando, for Appellee.
April 21, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
WALLIS, EDWARDS, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
2
Parties
Related changes
Get daily alerts for FL District Court of Appeal Opinions
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from FL District.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when FL District Court of Appeal Opinions publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.