Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal Maschelle Adrianne Pugh v. Eric Paul Pugh - Fam...
Routine Enforcement Amended Final

Maschelle Adrianne Pugh v. Eric Paul Pugh - Family Law Appeal Affirmed

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com FL District Court of Appeal Opinions
Filed
Detected
Email

Summary

The District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District affirmed a circuit court ruling in a family law dispute (Case No. 562024DR000181AXXXHC). The appellate court, per curiam, upheld the lower court's decision with Judges Klingensmith, Shaw, and Lott concurring. No substantive legal errors were found in the underlying family law matter.

Published by FL-4th DCA on courtlistener.com . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

What changed

The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's ruling in this family law matter without issuing a published opinion or legal analysis. The per curiam affirmance indicates the court found no reversible error in the lower proceedings.

This routine affirmance has no broader compliance implications beyond the parties to the dispute. It does not establish new legal precedent or impose obligations on any regulated entities, businesses, or industry sectors.

Archived snapshot

Apr 16, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

Jump To

Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project
, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

April 16, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

Maschelle Adrianne Pugh v. Eric Paul Pugh

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Disposition

Affirmed

Combined Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT

MASCHELLE ADRIANNE PUGH,
Appellant,

v.

ERIC PAUL PUGH,
Appellee.

No. 4D2025-1825

[April 16, 2026]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,
Martin County; Rebecca White, Judge; L.T. Case No.
562024DR000181AXXXHC.

Maschelle Adrianne Pugh, Jupiter, pro se.

Scott D. Glassman of Law Office of Scott Glassman, P.A., West Palm
Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, SHAW and LOTT, JJ., concur.


Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.

Get daily alerts for FL District Court of Appeal Opinions

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from FL-4th DCA.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
FL-4th DCA
Filed
April 16th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor
Document ID
No citation available
Docket
4D2025-1825

Who this affects

Applies to
Criminal defendants
Industry sector
9211 Government & Public Administration
Activity scope
Family law appeals Domestic relations
Geographic scope
Florida US-FL

Taxonomy

Primary area
Judicial Administration
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Civil Rights

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when FL District Court of Appeal Opinions publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!