Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal Marcus Blalock v. James Polk - Malpractice Case...
Routine Enforcement Removed Final

Marcus Blalock v. James Polk - Malpractice Case Dismissed

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com Texas Court of Appeals
Filed March 19th, 2026
Detected March 20th, 2026
Email

Summary

The Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District, has dismissed the appeal in Marcus Blalock v. James Polk due to an untimely notice of appeal. The court found that the appellant filed the notice of appeal nearly two months after the deadline, rendering the court without jurisdiction to hear the case.

What changed

The Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District, has issued a memorandum opinion dismissing the appeal in the case of Marcus Blalock v. James Polk. The dismissal is based on the appellant's failure to file a timely notice of appeal. The court determined that the notice of appeal was filed almost two months after the deadline of December 29, 2025, which was calculated based on Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1(a). Consequently, the court lacks jurisdiction to consider the appeal.

This ruling means the original trial court judgment stands. For legal professionals, this serves as a reminder of strict appellate filing deadlines. Failure to adhere to these deadlines, including the 90-day window after judgment (or after a timely motion to modify is overruled), will result in dismissal for want of jurisdiction. There are no provisions for extending the deadline beyond the 15-day grace period under Rule 26.3 for filing a motion to extend.

What to do next

  1. Review appellate court filing deadlines and procedures.

Source document (simplified)

Jump To

Top Caption Disposition Lead Opinion The text of this document was obtained by analyzing a scanned document and may have typos.

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project
, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

March 19, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

Marcus Blalock v. James Polk

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Disposition

Dismissed-Want of Jurisdiction

Lead Opinion

Court of Appeals
Tenth Appellate District of Texas

10-26-00068-CV

Marcus Blalock,
Appellant

v.

James Polk,
Appellee

On appeal from the
County Court at Law of Navarro County, Texas
Senior Judge H. D. Black Jr., presiding
Trial Court Cause No. C24-32228-CV

JUSTICE HARRIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Marcus Blalock, appealed from a judgment signed by the trial

court on September 26, 2025. Blalock filed a motion to reconsider in the trial

court on October 21, 2025, which was overruled by operation of law. Blalock

filed a notice of appeal in the trial court on February 20, 2026. Blalock was

notified by letter from the Clerk of this Court that the notice of appeal appears

to be untimely and that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction
if Blalock did not show grounds for continuing the appeal. Blalock has filed a

response showing that he was attempting to get a hearing from the trial court

but a hearing was never set until he found out that the motion had been

overruled by operation of law.

A notice of appeal must be filed within 90 days after the judgment is

signed when a motion to modify the judgment is timely filed. TEX. R. APP. P.

26.1(a). The deadline for filing a notice of appeal may be extended if a motion

is filed to extend the deadline within 15 days of the deadline to file a notice of

appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Beyond that time, the notice of appeal is

untimely, and this Court is without jurisdiction to consider it.

In this appeal, the notice of appeal was due on December 29, 2025, due

to holidays and weekends. The notice of appeal was filed almost two months

later, and was therefore, untimely. Accordingly, this Court does not have

jurisdiction and this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

LEE HARRIS
Justice

OPINION DELIVERED and FILED: March 19, 2026
Before Chief Justice Johnson,
Justice Smith, and
Justice Harris
Appeal dismissed
CV06

Blalock v. Polk Page 2

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
TX Courts
Filed
March 19th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor
Document ID
10-26-00068-CV
Docket
10-26-00068-CV

Who this affects

Applies to
Legal professionals
Industry sector
5411 Legal Services
Activity scope
Appellate Practice
Geographic scope
Texas US-TX

Taxonomy

Primary area
Judicial Administration
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Civil Procedure Appellate Practice

Get Courts & Legal alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when Texas Court of Appeals publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.