Lall v. Forouzani et al - Civil Personal Injury Dispute
Summary
The Northern District of California granted a stipulation to alter deadlines for defendants to respond to the amended complaint in Lall v. Forouzani et al. The court approved the proposed scheduling modification on April 17, 2026. Defendants previously filed a stipulation seeking extended time to respond, which plaintiff did not oppose.
What changed
The court granted a stipulation to modify the case schedule, allowing defendants Amirhossein Forouzani, Puffer Foundation, Puffer Labs Corp., Puffer Staking Limited, and Jason Andrew Vranek additional time to respond to the amended complaint. The stipulation was filed April 15, 2026 and approved by the court on April 17, 2026. Additionally, both parties filed documents regarding an administrative motion concerning whether materials should be sealed, with defendants filing their opposition on April 10 and plaintiff filing a response on April 14.
For affected parties and counsel, this represents standard case management activity in a civil diversity matter. The sealed materials dispute suggests confidential or commercially sensitive information may be at issue. These procedural developments do not alter substantive rights but require continued attention to court-ordered deadlines and potential further motion practice on the sealing question.
Archived snapshot
Apr 17, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Lall v. Forouzani et al
Case Number: 3:25-cv-04948-EMC Judge: Chen, Edward M Location: San Francisco Case Type: Civil Case Basis: Diversity Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other Date Filed:
June 11, 2025
Last Filing Date:
April 3, 2026
View Publicly Available Documents Case Summary No summary of this case is available
Recent Filings
| Date Filed | Docket Number | Document Description |
|---|---|---|
| 04-17-26 | 65 | Order by Judge Edward M Chen GRANTING [64] STIPULATION TO ALTER DEADLINES FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT.(vla, COURT STAFF) |
| 04-15-26 | 64 | STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO ALTER DEADLINES FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Amirhossein Forouzani, Puffer Foundation, Puffer Labs Corp., Puffer Staking Limited, Jason Andrew Vranek. (Attachments: # (1) Propo |
| 04-14-26 | 63 | RESPONSE re [62] Opposition/Response to Motion, [Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Statement Regarding Administrative Motion to Consider Sealing] by Vishal Lall. (Mix, Michael) |
| 04-10-26 | 62 | OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re [59] Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Material Should Be Sealed ) filed byAmirhossein Forouzani, Puffer Foundation, Puffer Labs Corp., Puffer Staking Limited, Jason Andrew Vra |
Related changes
Get daily alerts for NDCA Recently Filed Documents
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from NDCA.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when NDCA Recently Filed Documents publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.