Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal Taylor v. 3001 Northeast Expressway Owner - Cas...
Routine Enforcement Amended Final

Taylor v. 3001 Northeast Expressway Owner - Case Transferred

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com GA Court of Appeals Opinions
Filed March 25th, 2026
Detected March 25th, 2026
Email

Summary

The Georgia Court of Appeals has transferred the case of Kaylisse Taylor v. 3001 Northeast Expressway Owner (Ga), LLC d/b/a Verdant Peachtree Creek to the appropriate state or superior court. The appellate court determined it lacked jurisdiction over the appeal from a magistrate court's dispossessory judgment.

What changed

The Georgia Court of Appeals has issued an order transferring the case of Kaylisse Taylor v. 3001 Northeast Expressway Owner (Ga), LLC d/b/a Verdant Peachtree Creek. The court determined it lacks jurisdiction to hear the appeal directly from a magistrate court's judgment in a dispossessory action. The case was filed after the magistrate court granted Verdant a writ of possession.

This order means the appeal will be re-filed and heard in the appropriate state or superior court of DeKalb County, as per Georgia law and court rules. Legal professionals involved in this case must ensure the appeal is properly docketed and pursued in the designated trial court. There are no compliance deadlines or penalties associated with this procedural transfer, but it necessitates a continuation of the legal process in a different venue.

What to do next

  1. Ensure appeal is refiled and pursued in the appropriate state or superior court of DeKalb County.

Source document (simplified)

Jump To

Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project
, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

March 25, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

Kaylisse Taylor v. 3001 Northeast Expressway Owner (Ga), LLC D/B/A Verdant Peachtree Creek

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Disposition

Transferred To Superior/State Court

Combined Opinion

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________
March 25, 2026

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A26D0413. KAYLISSE TAYLOR v. 3001 NORTHEAST EXPRESSWAY
OWNER (GA), LLC d/b/a VERDANT PEACHTREE CREEK.

3001 Northeast Expressway Owner (GA), LLC d/b/a Verdant Peachtree Creek
(“Verdant”) filed a dispossessory action against Kaylisse Taylor in magistrate court.
On March 11, 2026, the magistrate court granted Verdant a writ of possession and
Taylor filed this application for discretionary appeal on March 13, 2026. We lack
jurisdiction.
Ordinarily, “the only avenue of appeal available from a magistrate court
judgment is provided by OCGA § 15-10-41(b)(1), which allows for a de novo appeal
to the state or superior court.” Tate v. Habif, 367 Ga. App. 435, 438–39(2) (886 SE2d
389) (2023) (citation modified). Thus, this Court has jurisdiction to address a
magistrate court order only if the order has been reviewed by a state or superior court.
See Harris v. Reserve at Hollywood LLC, 376 Ga. App. 553, 553 (920 SE2d 163) (2025).
The Georgia Constitution, however, provides that “[a]ny court shall transfer to the
appropriate court in the state any civil case in which it determines that jurisdiction or
venue lies elsewhere.” Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. I, Par. VIII; accord Court of
Appeals Rule 11(b).
To the extent this filing may be construed as an notice of appeal, it is hereby
TRANSFERRED to the Magistrate Court of DeKalb County with direction to
transmit it to the state or superior court of DeKalb County for disposition as
appropriate.1

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
03/25/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

1
We recognize that we are in possession of limited material and that our
determination that jurisdiction may lie in state court is limited by the dearth of
information. Thus, our ruling should not constrain either the magistrate court or the
state court to the extent those courts determine either that Taylor has not perfected
her right to appeal or that jurisdiction lies elsewhere.

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
GA Courts
Filed
March 25th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor
Document ID
A26D0413
Docket
A26D0413

Who this affects

Applies to
Legal professionals
Activity scope
Appellate Procedure
Geographic scope
US-GA US-GA

Taxonomy

Primary area
Judicial Administration
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Civil Procedure Appellate Procedure

Get Courts & Legal alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when GA Court of Appeals Opinions publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.