Dattu v. State Of Karnataka - Anticipatory Bail Application
Summary
The Karnataka High Court heard an anticipatory bail application filed by Dattu and Akshaykumar. The petition seeks release on bail in the event of arrest concerning Crime No. 104/2017, registered for an offense under Section 393 of the Indian Penal Code.
What changed
This document details an anticipatory bail application heard by the Karnataka High Court. The petitioners, Dattu and Akshaykumar, are seeking release on bail in connection with Crime No. 104/2017, registered by the Khataka Chincholi Police for an offense under Section 393 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The petition is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (new) and Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. (old).
The court heard arguments from both the petitioners' counsel and the High Court Government Pleader. The case arises from a complaint filed by the ASI, Vishwanath, and involves accused persons 1 to 4. The specific offense cited is under Section 393 of the IPC, which pertains to attempted robbery. The court's order will determine whether anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioners.
Source document (simplified)
## Unlock Advanced Research with PRISM AI
Integrated with over 4 crore judgments and laws — designed for legal practitioners, researchers, students and institutions
- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc -... Upgrade to Premium [Cites 5, Cited by 0 ] ### Karnataka High Court
Dattu vs State Of Karnataka on 25 March, 2026
-1-
NC: 2026:KHC-K:2659
CRL.P No. 200442 of 2026
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.200442 OF 2026
(438([Cr.PC](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/445276/))/482(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
1. DATTU S/O DESMUKH
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
OCC: LABOUR,
R/O BHAGYANAGAR VILLAGE,
TQ: BHALKI, DIST: BIDAR.
2. AKSHAYKUMAR S/O BANDEPPA,
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
OCC: LABOUR,
R/O KURUBKHEAGI VILLAGE
TQ: BHALKI, DIST: BIDAR.
Digitally signed by ...PETITIONERS
SHIVALEELA
DATTATRAYA (BY SRI SURAJ BHAVIKATTI, ADVOCATE FOR
UDAGI
SRI DEEPAK VISHNU BARAD, ADVOCATE)
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH KHATAK CHINCHOLI
POLICE STATION, DIST: BIDAR-585401,
NOW REPRSENTED BY
ADDL. SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
KALABURAGI BENCH-585102.
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI JAMADAR SHAHABUDDIN, HCGP)
-2-
NC: 2026:KHC-K:2659
CRL.P No. 200442 of 2026
HC-KAR
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482
OF BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 (NEW)
UNDER SECTION 438 OF CR.P.C., (OLD) PRAYING TO ALLOW
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION AND ORDER FOR RELEASE THE
PETITIONERS ON BAIL IN AN EVENT OF ARREST OF
PETITIONERS IN CRIME NO.104/2017 BY THE KHATAKA
CHINCHOLI POLICE, TQ: BHALKI, DIST: BIDAR IN THE COURT
OF ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BIDAR FOR THE
OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/S 398 OF IPC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
ORAL ORDER Learned High Court Government Pleader is directed
to notice for the respondent.
- Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and
learned High Court Government Pleader.
- The petitioners, who are accused Nos.1 and 3
have filed this petition under Section 482 of the Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of anticipatory -3- NC: 2026:KHC-K:2659 CRL.P No. 200442 of 2026 HC-KAR
bail in C.C. No.334/2018 arising out of Crime No.104/2017
registered by the Khataka Chincholi Police for the offence
punishable under Section 393 of the Indian Penal Code
(for short 'the IPC ').
- On the basis of the complaint filed by the ASI,
Vishwanath, Khataka Chincholi police have registered the
case in Crime No.104/2017 against accused 1 to 4 for the
for the above said offence. After investigation, the
Investigating Officer has submitted the chargesheet
against accused 1 to 4 for the commission of offence
under Section 398 of the IPC.
- After filing the chargesheet, the case was
registered in C.C.No.334/2018 on the file of the Civil
Judge and JMFC Court, Bhalki. Since the
accused/petitioners did not appear before the Court, the
Trial Court has issued NBW.
-4-
NC: 2026:KHC-K:2659 CRL.P No. 200442 of 2026 HC-KAR
- It is submitted by the learned counsel for the
petitioners that due to ill health, the petitioners could not
appear before the Trial Court.
- Considering the submission of the learned
counsel for the petitioners, I proceed to pass the
following:
ORDER
The Criminal Petition is allowed.
The respondent-Police are directed to release the
petitioners in the event of their arrest in C.C.No.334/2018
(arising out of Crime No.104/2017 registered by the
Khataka Chincholi Police) for the offence punishable under Section 398 of the Indian Penal Code, pending before Civil
Judge and JMFC Court, Bhalki, subject to the following
conditions:
(i) The petitioners shall appear before the Trial
Court on 26.03.2026 and shall execute a
personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- -5-
NC: 2026:KHC-K:2659 CRL.P No. 200442 of 2026 HC-KAR
(Rupees One Lakh only) each, with one surety
each for the likesum to the satisfaction of the
Trial Court.
(ii) The petitioners shall appear before the Trial
Court on all dates of hearing without fail.
(iii) The petitioners shall not tamper or threaten the
prosecution witnesses in any manner.
Sd/-
(G BASAVARAJA)
JUDGE
RSP
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21
CT: BH
Named provisions
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Courts & Legal alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when India Karnataka High Court publishes new changes.