Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal Elder v. Shri Ganesh Yellowstone LLC — Corporat...
Routine Enforcement Added Final

Elder v. Shri Ganesh Yellowstone LLC — Corporate Defendants Ordered to Obtain Counsel by April 8, 2026

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com US District Court DMT Docket Feed
Filed
Detected
Email

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Montana granted Plaintiff Josh Elder's Request for Entry of Default against corporate defendants Shri Ganesh Yellowstone, LLC and Ganeshay Bozeman, LLC, after their counsel withdrew on December 1, 2025 and no new attorney appeared within ninety days. The court ordered the corporate defendants to obtain counsel and respond to Elder's Request for Default by April 8, 2026, warning that failure to do so will result in entry of default. The order cites the longstanding rule that corporations and unincorporated associations must appear through an attorney, as well as D. Mont. L.R. 83.3(b).

Published by DMT on courtlistener.com . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

About this source

GovPing monitors US District Court DMT Docket Feed for new courts & legal regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 3 changes logged to date.

What changed

The court granted Josh Elder's Request for Entry of Default against corporate defendants Shri Ganesh Yellowstone LLC and Ganeshay Bozeman LLC. The defendants' prior counsel withdrew on December 1, 2025, and no new attorney appeared within ninety days. The court ordered the corporate defendants to obtain counsel and respond by April 8, 2026. Failure to comply will result in the Clerk entering default against them.\n\nCorporations and unincorporated associations appearing in federal court in Montana must be represented by licensed attorneys per D. Mont. L.R. 83.3(b). Corporate entities without counsel cannot appear in federal court and risk default judgment if they fail to obtain representation within the deadline ordered by the court.

What to do next

  1. Retain counsel to respond to Elder's Request for Default on behalf of Shri Ganesh Yellowstone LLC and Ganeshay Bozeman LLC by April 8, 2026

Archived snapshot

Apr 24, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

Jump To

Top Caption Trial Court Document The text of this document was obtained by analyzing a scanned document and may have typos.

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project
, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

March 25, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

Josh Elder v. Shri Ganesh Yellowstone, LLC; Ganeshay Bozeman, LLC; Purvish Soni

District Court, D. Montana

Trial Court Document

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
BUTTE DIVISION
JOSH ELDER,

CV-25-19-BU-JTJ
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
SHRI GANESH YELLOWSTONE, LLC;
GANESHAY BOZEMAN, LLC;
PURVISH SONI,
Defendants.

Plaintiff Josh Elder (Elder) has filed a Request for Entry of Default against

Defendants Shri Ganesh Yellowstone, LLC, (SGY) and Ganeshay Bozeman, LLC,
(GB) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). (Doc. 23).
SGY and GB initially appeared in this matter through counsel who filed an

Answer on their behalf on August 1, 2025. (Doc. 13). On November 24, 2025, their
counsel filed an Unopposed Motion to Withdraw. (Doc. 21). The affidavit included
with this motion stated that SGY and GB had been advised of their obligation to
retain new counsel. (Doc. 21-1, ¶ 6). The Court granted the motion on December 1,
2025. (Doc. 22).

It is a longstanding rule that corporations and other unincorporated
associations must appear in court through an attorney. In re American West Airlines
v. America West Airline, 40 F.3d 1058, 1059 (9th Cir. 2004); D-Beam, Ltd. P’ship v.

Roller Derby Skates, Inc., 366 F.3d 972, 973-74 (9th Cir. 2004). Further, L.R. 83.3(b)
of the District of Montana’s Local Rules of Procedure provides that any entity other
than an individual, including but not limited to a corporation, an unincorporated
association, a partnership, or a union, may appear only by an attorney. No counsel

having made an appearance on behalf of SGY or GB for over ninety days and no
response to Elder’s Request for Default having been filed within 14 days as required
by L.R. 7.1(d)(1)(B)(ii),

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. SGY and GB shall have until April 8, 2026, to have counsel respond to
Elder’s Request for Default on their behalf. Their failure to do so shall result in the
Court directing the Clerk to enter the default of SGY and GB.
DATED this 25th day of March 2026.

A fohn Johnston =—_—
United States Magistrate Judge

Named provisions

L.R. 83.3(b) L.R. 7.1(d)(1)(B)(ii)

Get daily alerts for US District Court DMT Docket Feed

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from DMT.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
DMT
Filed
March 25th, 2026
Compliance deadline
April 8th, 2026 (16 days ago)
Instrument
Enforcement
Branch
Judicial
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor
Document ID
CV-25-19-BU-JTJ
Docket
2:25-cv-00019

Who this affects

Applies to
Criminal defendants Legal professionals
Industry sector
5411 Legal Services
Activity scope
Default judgment proceedings Corporate legal representation Attorney appearance requirements
Geographic scope
United States US

Taxonomy

Primary area
Judicial Administration
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Civil Litigation Corporate Governance

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when US District Court DMT Docket Feed publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!