Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal Simin Nicholas Shaw v. U.S. Immigration & Custo...
Priority review Enforcement Added Final

Simin Nicholas Shaw v. U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement - Habeas Corpus

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com US District Court WDLA Docket Feed
Filed
Detected
Email

Summary

Pro se Petitioner Simin Nicholas Shaw, an immigration detainee at the South Louisiana ICE Processing Center in Basile, Louisiana, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 seeking release from detention. The Court directed service on respondents including the U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Louisiana, the U.S. Attorney General, DHS/ICE Office of General Counsel, and the facility Warden. Respondents must file a response within 21 days of service with summary judgment evidence regarding the lawfulness of Shaw's detention.

“IT IS ORDERED that a Response be filed within 21 days following the date of service of the Petition on the United States Attorney for the Western District of Louisiana, with summary judgment evidence regarding the lawfulness of his detention.”

US WDLA , verbatim from source
Published by US WDLA on courtlistener.com . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

About this source

GovPing monitors US District Court WDLA Docket Feed for new courts & legal regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 9 changes logged to date.

What changed

Simin Nicholas Shaw filed a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging the lawfulness of his immigration detention at the South Louisiana ICE Processing Center. The Magistrate Judge ordered respondents to file a response within 21 days of service, with summary judgment evidence addressing the lawfulness of detention, and granted Shaw 14 days thereafter to submit contradictory evidence.

Immigration detainees and their counsel should note this procedural sequence: the Court will determine whether genuine issues of material fact exist precluding summary judgment. If no evidentiary hearing is required, a Report and Recommendation will issue without further notice. The case is assigned to Judge S. Maurice Hicks, Jr. with Magistrate Judge Joseph H.L. Perez-Montes presiding.

Archived snapshot

Apr 27, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

Jump To

Top Caption Trial Court Document The text of this document was obtained by analyzing a scanned document and may have typos.

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project
, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

April 2, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

Simin Nicholas Shaw v. U S Immigration & Customs Enforcement

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Trial Court Document

a
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
LAFAYETTE DIVISION

SIMIN NICHOLAS SHAW #A070-399- CIVIL DOCKET NO. 6:26-CV-00587
873, SEC P
Petitioner

VERSUS JUDGE S. MAURICE HICKS, JR.

U S IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS MAGISTRATE JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES
ENFORCEMENT,
Respondents

MEMORANDUM ORDER
Before the Court is a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. §
2241 (ECF No. 1) filed by pro se Petitioner Simin Nicholas Shaw (“Shaw”), an
immigration detainee at the South Louisiana ICE Processing Center in Basile,
Louisiana. Shaw seeks release from detention.
A court may order a respondent to file an answer, motion, or other response,
in its discretion. 28 U.S.C. § 2243; Rule 4 of the Rules Governing §
2254 Cases; , 552 U.S. 264, 278 (2008);
, 6:18-CV-00544, 2018 WL 4869383, at *1 (W.D. La. 2018) (Hanna,
M.J.)1. And this Court has determined that a 21 day briefing schedule is reasonable
and appropriate in similar cases.

1 Under Rule 1(b), the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases also apply to § 2241 habeas cases.
, 2008 WL 835764, *2 (E.D. Cal. 2008); , 162 F. Supp. 2d 575,
577
(N.D. Tex. 2001); , 952 F. Supp. 348 (S.D. W.Va. 1997);
Accordingly, to determine whether Shaw is entitled to relief, THE CLERK IS
DIRECTED to serve a summons, a copy of the Petition (ECF No. 1), and a copy of this
Order, by certified mail, on: (1) the United States through the United States Attorney
for the Western District of Louisiana; (2) the United States Attorney General; (3)
DHS/ICE through its Office of General Counsel; and (4) the Warden where Shaw is
detained.
IT IS ORDERED that a Response be filed within 21 days following the date of
service of the Petition on the United States Attorney for the Western District of
Louisiana, with summary judgment evidence regarding the lawfulness of his
detention.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall have 14 days following the
filing of Respondents’ answer to produce contradictory summary judgment evidence
on the issue of the lawfulness of his detention.
After the record is complete and delays have run, the Court will determine if
genuine issues of material fact exist, which preclude summary judgment and
necessitate an evidentiary hearing. If no hearing is necessary, a Report and
Recommendation will be issued without further notice.
SIGNED on Thursday, April 2, 2026.
fy
JOSEPH H.L. PEREZ-MONTES
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

v. Gusman, 20-CV-449, 2020 WL 1848073, at *1 (E.D. La. Apr. 18, 2020) (“District courts are
therefore free to apply these rules to habeas petitions brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241”).

Citations

28 U.S.C. § 2241 authority for habeas corpus petition
28 U.S.C. § 2243 court discretion to order response

Get daily alerts for US District Court WDLA Docket Feed

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from US WDLA.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
US WDLA
Filed
April 2nd, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Branch
Judicial
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Substantive
Docket
6:26-cv-00587

Who this affects

Applies to
Immigration detainees Government agencies
Industry sector
9211 Government & Public Administration
Activity scope
Habeas corpus petitions Immigration detention
Geographic scope
US-LA US-LA

Taxonomy

Primary area
Immigration
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Civil Rights Judicial Administration

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when US District Court WDLA Docket Feed publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!