Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal Google Pays $85M Settlement for Deceptive Locat...
Urgent Enforcement Amended Final

Google Pays $85M Settlement for Deceptive Location Data Practices

Favicon for www.azag.gov Arizona AG Charities
Filed
Detected
Email

Summary

Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich secured an $85 million settlement with Google LLC for deceptively collecting users' location data, even when users had disabled the Location History setting. The company continued tracking through other settings like Web & App Activity and used the data to sell targeted advertisements, generating over $135 billion in advertising revenue in 2019. Of the settlement, $5 million is directed specifically for attorney general education programs, with the remainder requiring legislative appropriation to the general fund.

“This is one of the biggest consumer fraud lawsuits in Arizona history, and the settlement represents the largest amount per capita the internet giant has paid in a privacy and consumer-fraud lawsuit of this kind.”

AZ AG , verbatim from source
Published by AZ AG on azag.gov . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

About this source

GovPing monitors Arizona AG Charities for new courts & legal regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 3 changes logged to date.

What changed

Arizona's Attorney General obtained an $85 million settlement against Google LLC for deceptive and unfair practices involving the unauthorized collection of users' location data. The AG alleged that Google continued to track smartphones through settings like Web & App Activity even after consumers disabled Location History, then used this information to sell targeted advertisements generating billions in profit. This settlement represents the largest amount per capita Google has paid in a privacy or consumer-fraud lawsuit of this kind, and marks the first time an attorney general held the tech giant accountable in state court for dark-pattern design tactics.\n\nTechnology companies that collect user location data should review their consent mechanisms and opt-out procedures to ensure they fully honor user privacy settings. The settlement underscores that disabling a specific tracking feature does not authorize alternative data collection pathways, and companies with pre-programmed software on consumer devices face heightened scrutiny for deceptive data practices.

Penalties

$85 million settlement ($80M to general fund requiring legislative appropriation; $5M to attorney general education programs)

Archived snapshot

Apr 24, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

Attorney General Mark Brnovich Achieves Historic $85 Million Settlement with Google

Tuesday, October 4, 2022

PHOENIX – Attorney General Mark Brnovich announced a historic $85 million settlement with Google LLC for deceptively obtaining users’ location data to make billions of dollars in profit. This is one of the biggest consumer fraud lawsuits in Arizona history, and the settlement represents the largest amount per capita the internet giant has paid in a privacy and consumer-fraud lawsuit of this kind.

“When I was elected attorney general, I promised Arizonans I would fight for them and hold everyone, including corporations like Google, accountable,” said Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich. “I am proud of this historic settlement that proves no entity, not even big tech companies, is above the law.”
The $85 million settlement directs the bulk of the money to the general fund and it will require legislative appropriation before it can be spent.  Additionally, $5 million is specifically directed for attorney general education programs.

General Brnovich began an investigation of Google after a 2018 Associated Press article revealed that the company was misleading and deceiving consumers about the collection and use of their personal location data by tracking smartphones even when consumers disabled the “Location History” setting. General Brnovich sued Google in May 2020, becoming the first attorney general in the country to hold the tech giant accountable in state court for deceiving consumers through so-called “dark patterns” that were built into its software, including apps and Android phones. Dark patterns are coercive design tactics used to manipulate users’ behavior.

In his lawsuit, General Brnovich alleged that Google engaged in deceptive and unfair practices toward users by tracking their location data even when the company was told to stop. When users turned off their Location History in settings, Google continued to surreptitiously collect their location through other settings such as Web & App Activity and the company used that information to sell ads. The software is pre-programmed into Android phones purchased by consumers.

Google derives the vast majority of its profit by selling advertisements that are displayed to users of its products and services. In 2019, more than 80% of Google’s revenues—$135 billion of its $161 billion total—were generated through advertising. The company collects detailed information about its users, including their physical locations, to target them in specific geographic locations. This is regularly done without the users’ knowledge or consent.

Joseph A. Kanefield, Brunn (Beau) Roysden, and Michael S. Catlett handled the case for the Arizona Attorney General’s Office.

Outside counsel for the State of Arizona is Kevin Neal and Ken Ralston of Gallagher & Kennedy and Guy Ruttenberg and Mike Eshaghian of Ruttenberg IP Law. The parties used the services of Judge Jay C. Gandhi (Ret.) of JAMS Mediation.

Settlement here.

Notice of settlement here.

General announcement

Parties

Get daily alerts for Arizona AG Charities

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from AZ AG.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
AZ AG
Filed
October 4th, 2022
Instrument
Enforcement
Branch
Executive
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Substantive

Who this affects

Applies to
Technology companies Consumers
Industry sector
5112 Software & Technology
Activity scope
Location data collection Consumer fraud enforcement Advertising practices
Geographic scope
US-AZ US-AZ

Taxonomy

Primary area
Consumer Protection
Operational domain
Compliance
Topics
Data Privacy Consumer Finance

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when Arizona AG Charities publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!