Jacqueline Wilbourn v. Galadriel Enterprises, Inc. - Dismissed
Summary
The Georgia Court of Appeals dismissed case A26A1529 for lack of jurisdiction after finding that appellant Jacqueline Wilbourn failed to follow mandatory discretionary appeal procedures required by OCGA § 5-6-35. The underlying judgment of $7,888.64 arose from a magistrate court case involving Galadriel Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Paul Davis Restoration of Northwest Georgia.
What changed
The Court of Appeals dismissed this appeal after determining it lacked jurisdiction. The appellant failed to follow required discretionary appeal procedures when appealing from a magistrate court judgment—a requirement under OCGA § 5-6-35(a)(1) for de novo reviews of magistrate court rulings, and under § 5-6-35(a)(6) for damages judgments of $10,000 or less. The court emphasized that compliance with discretionary appeals procedures is jurisdictional.
Legal professionals and parties appealing magistrate court decisions in Georgia should ensure compliance with OCGA § 5-6-35 discretionary appeal requirements to preserve appellate rights. Failure to follow these procedural mandates results in dismissal without consideration of the underlying merits.
What to do next
- Monitor for updates
Archived snapshot
Apr 8, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Jump To
Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
April 8, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
Jacqueline Wilbourn v. Galadriel Enterprises, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
- Citations: None known
- Docket Number: A26A1529
Disposition: Dismissed
Disposition
Dismissed
Combined Opinion
Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________
April 08, 2026
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A26A1529. JACQUELINE WILBOURN v. GALADRIEL ENTERPRISES, INC.
After the magistrate court entered a $7,888.64 judgment in favor of plaintiff
Galadriel Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Paul Davis Restoration of Northwest Georgia, Inc.
(“Galadriel”), defendant Jackie Wilbourn appealed to the superior court. The
superior court also entered judgment in Galadriel’s favor for $7,888.64 and Wilbourn
filed a notice of appeal. This Court, however, lacks jurisdiction.
First, because the underlying issue involves the superior court’s de novo review
of a magistrate court ruling, Wilbourn was required to follow the discretionary appeal
procedures to appeal. OCGA § 5-6-35(a)(1); Greig v. Putnam County, 237 Ga. App. 57,
57 (513 SE2d 294) (1999).
Second, appeals in actions for damages in which the judgment is $10,000 or less
also must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review. OCGA §
5-6-35(a)(6), (b); Jennings v. Moss, 235 Ga. App. 357, 357 (509 SE2d 655) (1998).
“Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v.
Dep’t of Human Res., 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996).
Wilbourn’s failure to comply with the requisite procedure deprives this Court
of jurisdiction to consider this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
04/08/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Named provisions
Related changes
Get daily alerts for GA Court of Appeals Opinions
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from GA Court of Appeals.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when GA Court of Appeals Opinions publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.