Rogers v. State of Florida - Affirmation of Lower Court Ruling
Summary
The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in Matthew Allan Rogers v. State of Florida. The case, identified by docket number 5D2024-3262, resulted in the affirmation of the original disposition.
What changed
The Florida District Court of Appeal has affirmed the ruling in the case of Matthew Allan Rogers v. State of Florida, with docket number 5D2024-3262. This appellate decision upholds the disposition made by the lower court, indicating no reversal or modification of the original judgment.
This ruling is a final determination for the parties involved in this specific case. For legal professionals and criminal defendants, this signifies the conclusion of the appellate process for this matter, reinforcing the lower court's decision. No immediate compliance actions are required for other entities, as this is a specific case outcome.
Source document (simplified)
Jump To
Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
March 19, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
Matthew Allan Rogers v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Citations: None known
- Docket Number: 5D2024-3262
Disposition: Affirmed
Disposition
Affirmed
Combined Opinion
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 5D2024-3262
LT Case No. 2022-CF-000714-A
MATTHEW ALLAN ROGERS,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County.
Joel D. Fritton, Judge.
W. Charles Fletcher, of Law Offices of W. Charles Fletcher,
Jacksonville, for Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Tabitha
Mills, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
March 19, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
SOUD, KILBANE, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
2
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Courts & Legal alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when FL District Court of Appeal Opinions publishes new changes.