Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal Equity Capital Markets, LLC v. Certain Underwri...
Priority review Enforcement Amended Final

Equity Capital Markets, LLC v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London - Writ Denied

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com Louisiana Court of Appeal
Filed
Detected
Email

Summary

The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, denied a supervisory writ filed by Equity Capital Markets, LLC seeking to compel Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London to participate in an insurance appraisal process. The majority denied the writ. Judge Lanier dissented, arguing that under the unambiguous appraisal provision of the insurance policy, where parties disagree on property value or loss amount, either party may demand appraisal upon written request, and no time limitation exists for such demand. The dissent would have reversed the trial court's denial and remanded with instructions to order the defendant to select an appraiser.

Why this matters

Insurance companies and policyholders in Louisiana should review their appraisal clause provisions carefully. The dissent's reasoning suggests that written demands for appraisal triggered by a disagreement on loss value may not be subject to implied time limitations, and courts may be inclined to order the opposing party to select an appraiser when those conditions are met. Firms handling or disputing insurance losses should ensure any appraisal demand is in writing and clearly identifies the disagreement on value or loss amount.

AI-drafted from the source document, validated against GovPing's analyst note standards . For the primary regulatory language, read the source document .
Published by La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. on courtlistener.com . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

What changed

The Louisiana Court of Appeal denied plaintiff's supervisory writ application seeking to compel appraisal in an insurance dispute. Judge Lanier's dissent highlighted that the insurance policy unambiguously permits either party to demand written appraisal when parties disagree on loss value, and the policy contains no time limitation for such demand. The majority's denial means the trial court's ruling stands as-is. Insurers and policyholders in Louisiana should note that appraisal clauses in insurance policies will be enforced according to their plain terms, and the dissent's interpretation suggests courts may be receptive to compelling appraisal upon proper written demand even without explicit time limits in the policy.

Archived snapshot

Apr 21, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

Jump To

Top Caption Combined Opinion The text of this document was obtained by analyzing a scanned document and may have typos.

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project
, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

April 20, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

Equity Capital Markets, LLC v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd&39;s London

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Combined Opinion

%

STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

EQUITY CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC NO. 2026 CW 0058
VERSUS
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT APRIL 20, 2026

LLOYD'S LONDON

In Re: Equity Capital Markets, LLC, applying for supervisory
writs, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East
Baton Rouge, No. 750219.

BEFORE : LANIER, WOLFE, AND HESTER, JJ.
WRIT DENIED.

EW
CHH

Lanier, J., dissents and would grant the writ. Under the
unambiguous provisions of the policy of insurance at issue, if
the parties “disagree on the value of the property or the amount
of loss, either may make written demand for an appraisal of the
loss. In this event, each party will select a competent and
impartial appraiser.” The evidence shows that the parties
disagree on the value of the property and the amount of loss for
each of plaintiff’s claims. The parties do not dispute that
plaintiff made written demand for an appraisal for each loss,
and the policy does not contain a time limitation for such a
request. Accordingly, I would reverse the trial court’s denial
of plaintiff's motion to compel appraisal and remand the matter
to the trial court with instructions to order defendant, Certain
Underwriters at Lloyd’s London, to select a competent and
impartial appraiser pursuant to the policy with a time set by
the trial court. See Dore v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co., 2013-0545
(La. App. lst Cir. 11/1/13), 2013 WL 5915141 (unpublished).

Court OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

\

AY
ERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT

Get daily alerts for Louisiana Court of Appeal

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from La. Ct. App. 1st Cir..

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir.
Filed
April 20th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Branch
Judicial
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor
Docket
2026 CW 0058

Who this affects

Applies to
Insurers
Industry sector
5241 Insurance
Activity scope
Insurance coverage disputes Appraisal demand proceedings Policy interpretation
Geographic scope
US-LA US-LA

Taxonomy

Primary area
Insurance
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Securities Consumer Finance

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when Louisiana Court of Appeal publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!