Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal Daniel Patterson Reinstated to SC Bar
Routine Enforcement Amended Final

Daniel Patterson Reinstated to SC Bar

Favicon for www.sccourts.org SC Court Orders
Filed March 11th, 2026
Detected March 18th, 2026
Email

Summary

The Supreme Court of South Carolina has granted the petitions for reinstatement of Daniel Crawford Patterson to the practice of law. Patterson was previously suspended for disciplinary reasons and administrative failures.

What changed

The Supreme Court of South Carolina has issued an order reinstating Daniel Crawford Patterson to the practice of law. Patterson had been suspended for an eighteen-month period due to disciplinary actions, retroactive to March 21, 2017, and also faced administrative suspensions for failing to pay annual license fees and comply with continuing legal education requirements. He filed petitions for reinstatement in April 2025, which were reviewed by the Committee on Character and Fitness.

The Court has granted Patterson's petitions, finding that he has met the requirements for reinstatement under Rule 33(f), RLDE, and Rule 419(e), SCACR. This order signifies his return to active status as a regular member of the South Carolina Bar. For legal professionals, this case serves as an example of the process and requirements for reinstatement after disciplinary and administrative suspensions.

Source document (simplified)

The Supreme Court of South Carolina In the Matter of Daniel Crawford Patterson, Petitioner. Appellate Case Nos. 2025-000659 & 2025-000667 ORDER By opinion dated August 25, 2021, this Court suspended Petitioner from the practice of law for a period of eighteen months, retroactive to the date of his interim suspension on March 21, 2017. In re Patterson, 434 S.C. 86, 862 S.E.2d 711 (2021). Petitioner was also administratively suspended for failing to pay his annual license fees and failing to comply with annual continuing legal education requirements. In re Admin. Suspensions for Failure to Pay License Fees, S.C. Sup. Ct. Order dated Feb. 21, 2017; In re Admin. Suspensions for Failure to Comply with Continuing Legal Educ. Requirements, S.C. Sup. Ct. Order dated Apr. 20, 2017. In April 2025, Petitioner filed two petitions for reinstatement, one pursuant to Rule 33, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, seeking reinstatement from his eighteen- month disciplinary suspension, and the other pursuant to Rule 419, SCACR, seeking reinstatement from his administrative suspensions. After referral to the Committee on Character and Fitness, the Committee has filed a report recommending the Court reinstate Petitioner to the practice of law. Upon review of the entire record before the Court, we find Petitioner has demonstrated he meets the requirements of Rule 33(f), RLDE, and Rule 419(e), SCACR. Therefore, we grant the petitions and reinstate Petitioner as a regular member of the South Carolina Bar. s/ John W. Kittredge C.J. s/ John Cannon Few J. In re Patterson, 419 S.C. 279, 798 S.E.2d 159 (2017).

s/ George C. James, Jr. J. s/ D. Garrison Hill J. s/ Letitia H. Verdin J. Columbia, South Carolina March 11, 2026

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
Courts
Filed
March 11th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor

Who this affects

Applies to
Legal professionals
Geographic scope
State (South Carolina)

Taxonomy

Primary area
Judicial Administration
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Legal Ethics Professional Conduct

Get Courts & Legal alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when SC Court Orders publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.