City of Davenport v. Office of Auditor of State of Iowa - Attorney-Client Privilege in Government Audits
Summary
The Iowa Supreme Court issued an interlocutory opinion in Case No. 24-1160 addressing whether Iowa Code section 11.41(3) authorizes the state Auditor to access materials protected by attorney-client privilege during a government audit. The Court reviewed the City of Davenport's challenge to district court orders permitting an in camera review of privileged materials. This ruling establishes precedent on the scope of government audit authority versus attorney-client privilege protections for municipal entities.
What changed
The Iowa Supreme Court addressed whether the Office of Auditor of State has statutory authority under Iowa Code section 11.41(3) to access attorney-client privileged materials during an audit of the City of Davenport. The Court reviewed the City's interlocutory appeal challenging district court orders that permitted the Auditor to conduct an in camera review of potentially privileged documents and ruled that such access may be authorized by statute.
For government entities subject to state audit requirements, this ruling clarifies that attorney-client privilege may yield to statutory audit authority under certain conditions. Municipalities and other government agencies in Iowa should review their document retention and privilege practices, ensuring that communications intended to remain confidential are clearly marked and that legal counsel advises on privilege protections in the context of mandatory audit compliance. Legal professionals advising government clients should consider the implications for maintaining privilege when client entities are subject to state audit oversight.
Archived snapshot
Apr 18, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Case No. 24-1160
City of Davenport
v.
Office of Auditor of State of Iowa
In an action filed by the Iowa Auditor of State to enforce a subpoena, the City of Davenport was granted interlocutory review of district court orders which hold that the Auditor may have access to attorney–client privileged materials. The City contends the district court erred in ruling that Iowa Code section 11.41(3) authorizes the Auditor to review information otherwise protected by attorney–client privilege in connection with an audit, and by failing to require a prima facie showing for conducting an in camera review of the information.
County: Scott Trial Court Case No.: IFIF005448
Appellant
City of Davenport
Appellee
Office of Auditor of State of Iowa
Attorneys for the Appellant
Richard A. Davidson
Brett R. Marshall
Attorney for the Appellee
John McCormally
Amicus Curiae
Eric Wessan
Supreme Court
Oral Argument Schedule
15-15-5
Mar 25, 2026 9:00 AM
Briefs
Amended Appellant Brief (962.94 KB)
Appellant Reply Brief 1 (292.82 KB)
Appellant Reply Brief 2 (1.08 MB)
Amicus Curiae Brief--State of Iowa (372.57 KB)
Supreme Court Opinion
Opinion Number:
24-1160
Date Published:
Apr 17, 2026
PDF of the Opinion (134.95 KB)
Other Information
Date Retained:
Jan 27, 2026 View archived opinions from prior to November 2017
© 2026 Iowa Judicial Branch. All Rights Reserved.
Named provisions
Related changes
Get daily alerts for Iowa Supreme Court
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from Iowa Sup. Ct..
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when Iowa Supreme Court publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.