Scott v. Thomson Reuters Corporation et al - Case Management Statement
Summary
Plaintiff Meachun Scott filed a Case Management Statement with exhibits in a consumer credit civil action against Thomson Reuters Corporation and additional defendants in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The filing, dated April 15, 2026, is a procedural document that addresses case scheduling and administration matters. The underlying case, filed May 12, 2025, remains pending before Judge Richard Seeborg.
What changed
Plaintiff filed a Case Management Statement in this consumer credit civil litigation. The statement, which includes exhibits, was submitted to the court on April 15, 2026. This is a standard procedural filing that does not impose new obligations or alter existing rights.
Parties should monitor the docket for subsequent court orders addressing case scheduling, discovery deadlines, or potential settlement discussions. The filing has no direct compliance implications for non-parties.
What to do next
- Monitor for updates
Archived snapshot
Apr 15, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Scott v. Thomson Reuters Corporation et al
Case Number: 3:25-cv-04103-RS Judge: Seeborg, Richard Location: San Francisco Case Type: Civil Case Basis: Federal Question Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit Date Filed:
May 12, 2025
Last Filing Date:
April 15, 2026
View Publicly Available Documents Case Summary No summary of this case is available
Recent Filings
| Date Filed | Docket Number | Document Description |
|---|---|---|
| 04-15-26 | 40 | CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT (re 39) filed by Meachun Scott. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A-M)(Scott, Meachun) |
Related changes
Get daily alerts for NDCA Recently Filed Documents
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from NDCA.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when NDCA Recently Filed Documents publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.