Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal R v Defendant - Criminal Appeal (Bot Verificati...
Routine Notice Added Final

R v Defendant - Criminal Appeal (Bot Verification Page)

Email

Summary

BAILII (British and Irish Legal Information Institute) displays a bot verification challenge page requiring users to complete a proof-of-work task before accessing EWCA/Crim/2026/427. The page explains this measure protects against aggressive AI web scraping that causes downtime for legal research resources.

Published by BAILII on bailii.org . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

What changed

A bot verification challenge page from BAILII blocks access to EWCA Criminal Division case 2026/427. The website has implemented Anubis, a proof-of-work protection system, to mitigate aggressive AI scraping that causes service disruptions for legitimate researchers.

Legal professionals and researchers attempting to access this case should be aware that the case content itself is unchanged; access is temporarily restricted by technical protection measures. No regulatory obligations or compliance requirements are imposed by this page itself.

What to do next

  1. Complete bot verification to access case content

Archived snapshot

Apr 16, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

Making sure you're not a bot!

Loading...

You are seeing this because the administrator of this website has set up Anubis to protect the server against the scourge of AI companies aggressively scraping websites. This can and does cause downtime for the websites, which makes their resources inaccessible for everyone.

Anubis is a compromise. Anubis uses a Proof-of-Work scheme in the vein of Hashcash, a proposed proof-of-work scheme for reducing email spam. The idea is that at individual scales the additional load is ignorable, but at mass scraper levels it adds up and makes scraping much more expensive.

Ultimately, this is a placeholder solution so that more time can be spent on fingerprinting and identifying headless browsers (EG: via how they do font rendering) so that the challenge proof of work page doesn't need to be presented to users that are much more likely to be legitimate.

Please note that Anubis requires the use of modern JavaScript features that plugins like JShelter will disable. Please disable JShelter or other such plugins for this domain.

Get daily alerts for BAILII England & Wales Recent Decisions

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from BAILII.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
BAILII
Instrument
Notice
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor
Docket
EWCA/Crim/2026/427

Who this affects

Applies to
Legal professionals
Industry sector
5411 Legal Services
Activity scope
Case access restriction Legal research
Geographic scope
United Kingdom GB

Taxonomy

Primary area
Judicial Administration
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Judicial Administration

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when BAILII England & Wales Recent Decisions publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!