AG Mayes Wins Emergency Order Blocking SNAP Cut
Summary
Attorney General Mayes won a federal court temporary restraining order blocking the Trump administration's attempt to claw back Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits. The TRO, issued by Judge Talwani, prevents USDA from enforcing a directive requiring states to undo the release of full November SNAP benefits. AG Mayes and a coalition of 24 attorneys general and governors filed the emergency motion after USDA sent states a late-night memo threatening to hold them financially liable for processing full benefits.
About this source
GovPing monitors Arizona AG Charities for new courts & legal regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 3 changes logged to date.
What changed
The court granted a temporary restraining order requested by a coalition of 25 attorneys general and governors, blocking USDA's November 8 directive that threatened to hold states financially liable for processing full SNAP benefits in compliance with the agency's earlier guidance. The TRO prevents USDA from enforcing the 'undo' directive while litigation proceeds. For states that had already authorized full SNAP benefit releases, including Arizona, the order preserves the status quo and prevents the federal government from recovering funds already distributed to recipients.
Archived snapshot
Apr 24, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
PHOENIX – Attorney General Mayes today won a court order temporarily blocking the Trump administration’s attempts to claw back Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits and punish states that release them. Attorney General Mayes and 24 other attorneys general and governors filed an emergency motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) last night after the Trump administration sent states an alarming late-night memo directing them to “immediately undo” the release of SNAP benefits.
In a Saturday night letter, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) ignored its own prior guidance and threatened that the release of full November benefits would be considered “unauthorized.” Several states, including Arizona, had already begun issuing these benefits in accordance with USDA’s Friday memo stating that the agency would soon release full funding.
This morning, Judge Talwani issued an order granting the temporary restraining order requested by the states.
“In processing full SNAP benefits for November, Arizona was following USDA’s own guidance as well as a court order,” said Attorney General Mayes. “The Trump administration’s cruel and chaotic attempt to undo their earlier guidance continues to confuse and harm families who need access to their SNAP benefits to feed themselves and their families. We will keep fighting in court to ensure Arizonans have access to food.”
Background:
On November 7, after the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island ordered USDA to make full SNAP benefits available to the states, USDA informed states that it was complying with the Court’s order and completing the processes necessary to make full SNAP benefits available. As a result of the Court’s order and USDA’s guidance, Massachusetts and other states took action to authorize the release of full SNAP benefits for their residents.
One day later, after successfully filing an emergency application with the Supreme Court to block the lower court’s order, USDA abruptly demanded that states “undo” the efforts taken to administer full SNAP benefits. The federal government threatened to hold states financially liable for taking steps to process full benefits for their residents.
In their motion for a temporary restraining order, the coalition argues that USDA has once again placed impossible burdens on states and that the November 8 directive must be enjoined.
Joining Mayes in submitting the amended motion were the attorneys general of California, Minnesota, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaiʻi, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin, along with the governors of Kansas, Kentucky, and Pennsylvania.
A copy of last night's filing is available here.
Mentioned entities
Parties
Related changes
Get daily alerts for Arizona AG Charities
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from AZ AG.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when Arizona AG Charities publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.