AG Bonta Moves to Permanently Block Trump Mail Voting Executive Order
Summary
California Attorney General Rob Bonta co-led a coalition of 23 attorneys general in filing a motion for summary judgment seeking to permanently block President Trump's Executive Order No. 14399, which restricts mail voting by requiring voter eligibility pre-authorization by the federal government. The coalition argues the executive order unconstitutionally invades states' authority to regulate elections. The U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts has ordered responses by May 7, 2026, with a hearing scheduled for June 2, 2026 at 7:00 AM PT.
“We are seeking summary judgment because we firmly believe that the law is on our side and that the case can be decided expeditiously.”
About this source
GovPing monitors California AG Charities for new courts & legal regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 5 changes logged to date.
What changed
California AG Bonta, leading a 23-state coalition, filed a motion for summary judgment in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts seeking to permanently block Executive Order No. 14399 on mail voting. The coalition argues the executive order unconstitutionally dictates federal voter eligibility lists, coerces states to deny ballots to voters not on federal lists, and improperly charges USPS with compiling mail voter eligibility lists, all of which invade states' constitutional authority over election administration.
State election officials and attorneys general in the coalition—including Arizona, Nevada, Washington, New York, Illinois, and others—face potential fiscal and operational impacts if the executive order takes effect, including being forced to administer elections under federal procedures and facing legal jeopardy from directives to investigate and prosecute those who issue ballots to allegedly ineligible voters. The coalition states the executive order causes sovereign injury to their power to administer elections, fiscal injury from compliance costs, and reputational harm.
Archived snapshot
Apr 24, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Attorney General Bonta Moves to Permanently Block President Trump’s Executive Order Restricting Mail Voting, Exerting Control over Elections
- Press Release
- Attorney General Bonta Moves to Permanently Block President … Friday, April 24, 2026 Contact: (916) 210-6000, agpressoffice@doj.ca.gov Coalition seeks final ruling after filing lawsuit earlier this month to challenge unlawful executive order
OAKLAND — California Attorney General Rob Bonta yesterday co-led a coalition of 23 attorneys general, along with the Governor of Pennsylvania, in filing a motion for summary judgment in their ongoing challenge to President Trump’s executive order that unlawfully attempts to interfere with states’ constitutional authority to administer elections by restricting voter eligibility and mail voting to lists of voters pre-authorized by the federal government. The power to regulate elections belongs primarily to the states. The President has no constitutional authority to make or alter laws governing federal elections. Earlier this month, Attorney General Bonta co-led the same coalition in bringing a lawsuit against the Administration, arguing that Executive Order No. 14399, entitled Ensuring Citizenship Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections, is unconstitutional and beyond the authority of the President and other federal officials. The motion for summary judgment asks the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts to permanently block enforcement of the key provisions of the executive order, on the grounds that the law is clear and the case can be decided without a trial.
“President Trump’s executive order not only represents a dangerous attempt to erode public trust in free and fair elections; it also reeks of desperation. Facing clear political headwinds — as he and Republicans are likely to suffer heavy losses in the upcoming midterm elections — he is throwing everything at the wall and hoping something sticks. This will not,” said Attorney General Bonta. “We are seeking summary judgment because we firmly believe that the law is on our side and that the case can be decided expeditiously. President Trump has used mail voting himself. If it’s good enough for him, it should be accessible to other voters without unnecessary and unlawful obstacles.”
The coalition’s motion for summary judgment argues, among other things, that:
- The executive order’s attempt to dictate federal voter eligibility lists for each state, and its attempt to coerce states to deny ballots to voters excluded from those lists, unconstitutionally invades the coalition states’ power over their voter rolls.
- The executive order’s attempt to charge the states and USPS with compiling mail voter eligibility lists, and its prohibition on USPS transmitting mail ballots from voters not on those lists are unconstitutional and run headlong into states’ and Congress’s authority to regulate elections and Congress’s power to regulate USPS.
- The executive order threatens serious injury to the coalition states, including harms to the states’ sovereign powers to administer their elections, fiscal injuries from states being forced to administer elections under the federal government’s new procedures, legal jeopardy to states and their elections officials from the executive order’s directives to investigate and prosecute those who issue ballots to individuals purportedly ineligible to vote in a federal election, and harms to states’ reputations and public trust. The court has ordered the Trump Administration to file its response and related motions by Thursday, May 7, 2026. A hearing on the motions is scheduled for Tuesday, June 2, 2026 at 7:00 AM PT/10:00 AM ET. The complete scheduling order is available here.
Attorney General Bonta co-led the filing of the motion along with Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell, Nevada Attorney General Aaron Ford, and Washington Attorney General Nick Brown. They were joined by the attorneys general of Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and Wisconsin, as well as Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro.
#
Related changes
Get daily alerts for California AG Charities
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from CA AG.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when California AG Charities publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.