Federal Courts

Roe CL 284 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. - Personal Injury Product Liability

A new civil case, Roe CL 284 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al, was filed on March 3, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case is based on diversity jurisdiction and involves claims of personal injury and product liability. The initial filings include a complaint and proposed summons.

A.G. v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al - Civil Case Filing

A civil case titled A.G. v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al was filed on March 3, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, assigned number 4:26-cv-01835-YGR, involves a conditional transfer order for coordinated pretrial proceedings.

Hernandez et al v. State Farm General Insurance Company - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Hernandez et al v. State Farm General Insurance Company, was filed on March 3, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case number is 5:26-cv-01831 and the filing fee was $405.

K.S. v. Lyft Inc et al - Civil Case

A new civil case, K.S. v. Lyft Inc et al, has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, bearing number 3:26-cv-01833-RFL, was filed on March 3, 2026, under diversity jurisdiction.

Randolph v. Veev Group, Inc. et al - Labor: Other

A new civil case, Randolph v. Veev Group, Inc. et al, was filed on March 3, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a Notice of Removal from Alameda Superior Court and concerns Labor: Other. The initial filing fee was $405.

Tummalacherla v. Edlow et al - Immigration Actions

A new civil case, Tummalacherla v. Edlow et al, was filed on March 3, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves 'Other Immigration Actions' with the U.S. Government as a defendant. The initial filing includes a complaint and proposed summons.

Barricks v. Wright - Excessive Force Appeal Affirmed

The Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's decision denying qualified immunity to a sheriff's deputy accused of excessive force. The court found that disputed facts regarding the force used during an arrest necessitate a trial, affirming the appeal denial.

Beckford v. Elevance Health, Inc. - Employment Discrimination Appeal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated and remanded a district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Elevance Health, Inc. The court found that the district court erred in its assessment of the prima facie case for employment discrimination, potentially shifting the burden of proof prematurely. The case involves claims of race discrimination under Title VII and other statutes.

Hoffman v. Inova Health Care Services - Employment Discrimination

The Fourth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of employment discrimination claims filed by two CRNAs against Inova Health Care Services and NAPA. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to state a claim and that one plaintiff did not exhaust administrative remedies.

Fourth Circuit Affirms Ruling in Hoffman v. INOVA Health Care

The Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's dismissal of claims brought by two CRNAs against Inova Health Care Services and North American Partners in Anesthesia (NAPA). The plaintiffs alleged discrimination and joint employer status after their clinical privileges were suspended and employment terminated due to refusal of COVID-19 vaccinations.