Treasury Issues Joint Rule Implementing GENIUS Act Stablecoin Provisions

April 14, 2026

From Enforcement to Framework: Treasury Advances Stablecoins Under GENIUS Act

Margaret Beasley, Nicole Boeckmann, Bryan W. McCracken, David Shargel Bracewell LLP + Follow Contact LinkedIn Facebook X Send Embed

Over the past several years, US crypto policy has reflected two competing regulatory approaches in Washington. Under the Biden administration, agencies took an enforcement-forward posture, with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) bringing high-profile actions against digital asset platforms and market participants such as Coinbase [1] and Binance, [2] while the Department of Justice pursued criminal enforcement against Binance [3] and its founder [4] for anti-money laundering (AML) and sanctions violations. At the same time, the Department of the Treasury addressed these same AML and sanctions risks through guidance. [5] This approach, often described as “regulation by enforcement,” left industry participants navigating evolving interpretations of law rather than working within a tailored regulatory framework.

By contrast, the Trump administration quickly abandoned this approach, with the SEC dropping both enforcement actions against Coinbase and Binance, and issuing a pardon to Binance’s founder, Changpeng Zhao, while declaring that “the Biden administration’s war on crypto is over.” At the same time, the administration has advanced a more structured regulatory approach through the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for the US Stablecoins Act (GENIUS Act), which establishes a federal regulatory framework for payment stablecoins — digital assets designed to maintain a stable value, typically pegged to the US dollar.

Treasury has now begun to implement this shift. On April 8, 2026, Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued a joint proposed rule to implement key provisions of the GENIUS Act. The proposal would bring permitted payment stablecoin issuers (PPSIs) squarely within the US anti-money laundering and sanctions compliance framework, treating them as financial institutions for the purpose of the Bank Secrecy Act.

The proposal is grounded in national security concerns. Treasury emphasized that while payment stablecoins may transform payment systems, the scale and centrality of the US financial system make these instruments an attractive target for illicit finance. To address this, the rule would require PPSIs to implement risk-based AML programs and maintain effective sanctions compliance programs, aligning PPSIs with a framework long applied to traditional financial institutions. Practically, stablecoin issuers should expect regulator scrutiny not only of their transaction monitoring and customer due diligence processes, but also of their sanctions screening protocols, their record of blocking sanctioned entities and their compliance with reporting obligations.

This development comes during a broader policy debate over the role of stablecoins in the financial system. On the same day Treasury issued its joint proposal, the White House’s Council of Economic Advisers supported a proposal to allow stablecoin issuers to offer yield to their  holders, or, in other words, pay investors a return on their holdings. These parallel actions underscore the dual track emerging in Washington. On one hand, policymakers are exploring ways to expand the utility of stablecoins. On the other hand, regulators are moving to ensure that any such expansion is accompanied by robust safeguards against illicit finance and national security risks. As this regulatory landscape continues to evolve rapidly, those operating in the digital assets space should closely monitor further rulemaking and guidance in this area and we will continue to track developments as they unfold.

Public comment to the joint proposal will be available for 60 days after its publication in the Federal Register, ending on June 9, 2026.

[1] SEC v. Coinbase, Inc., 23-cv-04738 (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

[2] SEC v. Binance Holdings Limited, et al., 23-cv-1599 (D.D.C. 2023).

[3] United States v. Binance Holdings Limited, et al., 23-cr-178 (W.D. Wash. 2023).

[4] United States v. Zhao, 23-cr-179 (W.D. Wash. 2023).

[5] Treasury, Illicit Finance Risk Assessment of Decentralized Finance.

Send Print Report

Related Posts

• FinCEN's Cartel Crackdown on Three Mexican Financial Institutions: Implications for US Financial Transactions
• FinCEN Adopts Interim Final Rule Limiting CTA Reporting Requirements to Foreign Reporting Companies
• Corporate Transparency Act Enforceable With Extended Deadlines Following Actions of Fifth Circuit and FinCEN
• PRG 2024 Post-Election Pulse Check: Digital Assets

Latest Posts

• From Enforcement to Framework: Treasury Advances Stablecoins Under GENIUS Act See more »

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
Attorney Advertising.

©
Bracewell LLP

Written by:

Bracewell LLP Contact + Follow Margaret Beasley + Follow Nicole Boeckmann + Follow Bryan W. McCracken + Follow David Shargel + Follow more less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA

• ✔ Increased readership
• ✔ Actionable analytics
• ✔ Ongoing writing guidance Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra

Start Publishing »

Published In:

Anti-Money Laundering + Follow Bank Secrecy Act + Follow Digital Assets + Follow FinCEN + Follow New Legislation + Follow Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) + Follow Proposed Rules + Follow Sanctions + Follow Stablecoins + Follow U.S. Treasury + Follow Administrative Agency + Follow Finance & Banking + Follow International Trade + Follow more less

Bracewell LLP on:

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Sign Up Log in ** By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.* - hide - hide