Changeflow GovPing Banking & Finance SEC Charges Voyager Pacific Capital, Hardcastle...
Urgent Enforcement Added Final

SEC Charges Voyager Pacific Capital, Hardcastle, Giarmarco, and Medlock with Securities Fraud

Favicon for www.sec.gov SEC Litigation Releases
Filed
Detected
Email

Summary

The SEC charged Voyager Pacific Capital Management LLC, CEO Roger David Hardcastle, former CFO John Giarmarco, and then-COO Vanessa Lung-Medlock with conducting a multi-year fraudulent scheme from September 2020 through March 2024 involving a real-estate investment fund. The complaint alleges that more than $15 million in new investor money was used to pay existing investors in Ponzi-like fashion, while millions more were diverted through undisclosed transactions to entities owned or controlled by Hardcastle and Giarmarco. Hardcastle and Giarmarco have agreed to bifurcated settlements subject to court approval, including permanent injunctions and monetary relief to be determined.

“The SEC's complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, alleges that, from September 2020 through March 2024, rather than investing equity investor money as promised, Hardcastle, Giarmarco, and Medlock caused Voyager to use more than $15 million dollars in new investor money to pay current investors in Ponzi-like fashion.”

SEC , verbatim from source
Published by SEC on sec.gov . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

What changed

The SEC filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California charging Voyager Pacific Capital Management LLC and three individuals with violating antifraud provisions of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5. The complaint seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement with prejudgment interest, civil penalties, and conduct-based injunctions prohibiting the individuals from participating in securities offerings. Hardcastle and Giarmarco have consented to judgments containing injunctive and monetary relief, subject to court approval.

Registered investment advisers and fund managers managing pooled investment vehicles should review allocation and transfer practices involving investor capital. The conduct described—using new investor money to pay existing investors and transferring funds to entities controlled by principals—represents the specific pattern charged under the antifraud provisions. Any adviser whose allocation practices between investor cohorts lack clear documentation or disclosure faces similar enforcement exposure.

Archived snapshot

Apr 22, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

More in this Section

Voyager Pacific Capital Management, LLC; Roger David Hardcastle; John Giarmarco; Vanessa Lung Medlock; and Relief Defendants Adagio SPE LLC; Andante SPE LLC; Brighton Cove LLC; Cayucos Dream, LLC; GSD Equities, LLC; HGM Holdings LLC; Kastlemark LLC; Martin-Taylor Company LLC; Premier Property Management Group, LLC

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Litigation Release No. 26534 / April 21, 2026

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Voyager Pacific Capital Management, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 1:26-cv-02985-JLT-SAB (E.D. Cal. filed April 20, 2026)

SEC Charges Real Estate Fund Manager and Three California Residents in Alleged Multimillion Dollar Fraud Scheme

The Securities and Exchange Commission charged Voyager Pacific Capital Management, LLC, its CEO, Roger David Hardcastle, its former CFO, John Giarmarco, and its then-COO, Vanessa Lung-Medlock, with allegedly engaging in a multi-year fraudulent scheme in connection with a real-estate investment fund managed by Voyager. Hardcastle and Giarmarco have agreed to bifurcated settlements in connection with this civil enforcement action.

The SEC’s complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, alleges that, from September 2020 through March 2024, rather than investing equity investor money as promised, Hardcastle, Giarmarco, and Medlock caused Voyager to use more than $15 million dollars in new investor money to pay current investors in Ponzi-like fashion. According to the complaint, these Ponzi-like payments were necessary, in part, because Hardcastle and Giarmarco had taken millions of dollars of investor money from the real-estate investment fund and given that money to entities that they owned or controlled in a series of undisclosed and prohibited transactions. The complaint alleges that, in total, millions of dollars of investor funds were not invested as promised, resulting in losses to the fund, and ultimately its investors.

Voyager, Hardcastle, and Giarmarco are charged with violating the antifraud provisions of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder and Medlock is charged with violating the antifraud provisions of Section 17(a)(1) and (3) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5(a) and (c) thereunder. The complaint seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement with prejudgment interest, civil penalties, and a conduct-based injunction against each of the individual defendants permanently enjoining each from participating in the issuance, purchase, offer, or sale of any security except for purchases or sales for the defendant’s own personal accounts. The complaint also names Adagio SPE LLC, Andante SPE LLC, Brighton Cove LLC, Cayucos Dream, LLC, GSD Equities, LLC, HGM Holdings LLC, Kastlemark LLC, Martin-Taylor Company LLC, and Premier Property Management Group, LLC as relief defendants and seeks disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest from each.

Hardcastle consented to the entry of a judgment, subject to court approval, in which he agreed (1) to be permanently enjoined from violating the charged provisions of the federal securities laws, (2) to be permanently enjoined pursuant to the conduct-based injunction described above, and (3) that, upon motion of the Commission, the Court shall determine whether it is appropriate to order disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and/or a civil penalty. Giarmarco, without admitting or denying the allegations made in the complaint, consented to the entry of a judgment, subject to court approval, containing the same injunctive and monetary relief agreed to by Hardcastle.

In a parallel criminal proceeding, United States v. David Hardcastle, 1:25-cr-00016-JLT-SKO (E.D. Cal. filed Feb. 18, 2026), David Hardcastle pleaded guilty to one count of conspiring to commit wire fraud.

The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Grace M. Osberg and Tracy W. Bowen, and was supervised by Kimberly L. Frederick and Nicholas P. Heinke, all of the SEC’s Denver Regional Office. The litigation is being conducted by Jacqueline M. Moessner and Ms. Osberg, and supervised by Gregory A. Kasper.

The SEC appreciates the assistance of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of California and the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Sacramento Field Office.

Resources

Named provisions

Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 10b-5

Get daily alerts for SEC Litigation Releases

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from SEC.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
SEC
Filed
April 21st, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Branch
Executive
Joint with
U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of California Federal Bureau of Investigation
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Substantive
Document ID
Litigation Release No. 26534
Docket
1:26-cv-02985-JLT-SAB

Who this affects

Applies to
Broker-dealers Fund managers Investors
Industry sector
5231 Securities & Investments
Activity scope
Securities fraud enforcement Investment fund management Investor fund misappropriation
Geographic scope
United States US

Taxonomy

Primary area
Securities
Operational domain
Legal
Compliance frameworks
SOX
Topics
Securities Consumer Finance Corporate Governance

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when SEC Litigation Releases publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!