Changeflow GovPing Banking & Finance Oregon Governor Tina Kotek Signs HB 4116, Elimi...
Routine Notice Added Final

Oregon Governor Tina Kotek Signs HB 4116, Eliminating Interest-Rate Exportation

Favicon for www.jdsupra.com JD Supra Finance & Banking
Published
Detected
Email

Summary

Oregon Governor Tina Kotek signed House Bill 4116 on April 7, 2026, completing Oregon's opt-out of Section 521 of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act (DIDMCA) for certain consumer finance loans. The bill amends the Oregon Consumer Finance Act, providing that DIDMCA's interest-rate exportation framework does not apply to covered consumer finance loans made in Oregon.

Published by Sheppard Mullin on jdsupra.com . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

What changed

Oregon's HB 4116 removes the ability for lenders to export interest rates permitted by their home state to consumer loans originated in Oregon, effectively subjecting covered consumer finance loans to Oregon's rate limits rather than the lender's home-state rates. The law's practical significance is linked to unresolved litigation, as the Tenth Circuit has granted en banc rehearing in a case challenging Colorado's comparable DIDMCA opt-out statute. State-chartered banks, fintech partners, and consumer lenders operating multistate programs should continue monitoring the Colorado case and related state activity.

Archived snapshot

Apr 17, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

April 17, 2026

Oregon Governor Signs DIDMCA Opt-Out Bill

A.J.S. Dhaliwal, Mehul Madia, Maxwell Earp-Thomas Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP + Follow Contact LinkedIn Facebook X ;) Embed

On April 7, Oregon Governor Tina Kotek signed House Bill 4116 into law, completing Oregon’s opt-out of Section 521 of DIDMCA for certain consumer finance loans in the state. The bill (previously discussed here) amends the Oregon Consumer Finance Act and provides that DIDMCA’s interest-rate exportation framework does not apply to covered consumer finance loans made in Oregon.

Putting It Into Practice: Oregon’s enactment continues the recent trend of states testing the scope of DIDMCA opt-out authority. The practical significance of Oregon’s new law remains tied to the unresolved litigation over Colorado’s opt-out statute (previously discussed here). The Tenth Circuit has granted en banc rehearing and vacated the panel decision, removing its precedential force while the full court reconsiders the issue. State-chartered banks, fintech partners, and other consumer lenders should continue monitoring the Colorado case and related state activity as they assess multistate lending programs.

;) ;) Report

Related Posts

Latest Posts

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
Attorney Advertising.

©
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Written by:

Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP Contact + Follow A.J.S. Dhaliwal + Follow Mehul Madia + Follow Maxwell Earp-Thomas + Follow more less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA

  • ✔ Increased readership
  • ✔ Actionable analytics
  • ✔ Ongoing writing guidance Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra

Start Publishing »

Published In:

Consumer Financial Products + Follow Consumer Lenders + Follow DIDMCA + Follow FinTech + Follow Interest Rates + Follow Lenders + Follow Loans + Follow New Legislation + Follow Opt-Outs + Follow Oregon + Follow Regulatory Reform + Follow State and Local Government + Follow State Legislatures + Follow General Business + Follow Consumer Protection + Follow Finance & Banking + Follow more less

Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP on:

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Sign Up Log in ** By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.* - hide - hide

Named provisions

Section 521 of DIDMCA

Get daily alerts for JD Supra Finance & Banking

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from Sheppard Mullin.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
Sheppard Mullin
Published
April 7th, 2026
Instrument
Notice
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor
Document ID
HB 4116 (2026)

Who this affects

Applies to
Banks Financial advisers Consumers
Industry sector
5221 Commercial Banking
Activity scope
Consumer lending Interest rate regulation
Geographic scope
US-OR US-OR

Taxonomy

Primary area
Consumer Finance
Operational domain
Compliance
Compliance frameworks
Dodd-Frank
Topics
Consumer Protection Banking

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when JD Supra Finance & Banking publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!