OFAC Issues Advisory Warning on Sham Transactions
Summary
On March 31, 2026, the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued an advisory warning financial institutions about sham transactions, in which blocked persons attempt to evade sanctions by transferring property through proxies or intermediaries while retaining effective control. The advisory outlines red flags including commercially unreasonable transfers, transfers to family members or close associates, unclear business purposes, complex corporate structures in high-risk jurisdictions, and transfers made at or near the time of a person's designation. Institutions that discover a blocked person retains an interest in property within U.S. possession or control must block and report that property to OFAC.
“If institutions become aware that a blocked person retains an interest in property that is held within the United States or is in the possession or control of a U.S. person, the property must be blocked and reported to OFAC.”
About this source
GovPing monitors JD Supra Finance & Banking for new banking & finance regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 391 changes logged to date.
What changed
OFAC issued an advisory on March 31, 2026, defining sham transactions as property transfers in which blocked persons appear to relinquish control on paper while retaining effective ownership through proxies or intermediaries. The advisory provides a non-exhaustive list of red flags for financial institutions to monitor, including commercially unreasonable transfers, transfers to family members or close associates, lack of clear business purpose, complex corporate structures in high-risk jurisdictions, and transfers made at or near the time of OFAC designation.
Financial institutions facilitating international property transactions should review their due diligence and sanctions screening procedures to identify potential sham transactions. If an institution becomes aware that a blocked person retains an interest in property within the United States or in the possession or control of a U.S. person, the property must be blocked and reported to OFAC. The advisory does not interfere with legitimate business transactions where parties seek to comply with sanctions in good faith.
Archived snapshot
Apr 22, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
April 22, 2026
OFAC Issues Advisory Warning on Sham Transactions
Ryan Sullivan Ballard Spahr LLP + Follow Contact LinkedIn Facebook X ;) Embed
On March 31, 2026, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) issued an advisory on sham transactions, highlighting the compliance risks financial institutions must navigate when facilitating international property transactions.
What is a Sham Transaction?
OFAC defines a “Sham Transaction” as one in which a blocked person, typically operating through proxies or intermediaries, effectuates the transfer or concealment of a continuing interest in property, without genuinely extinguishing said interest, in an attempt to evade U.S. sanctions. In other words, sham transactions are those in which an individual appears to relinquish property on paper but remains effectively in control of it.
Who do Sham Transactions Apply To?
OFAC publishes a List of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (“SDN List”) that is intended to restrict the access of the named individuals to the American financial system by preventing them from transferring, withdrawing, or otherwise dealing with any property and interests that are within the United States or within the possession or control of a U.S. person and prohibiting U.S. persons from transacting with them.
If an individual is blocked, their assets are frozen, and they are unable to exercise the powers and privileges of their property and interests without authorization from OFAC.
How Do Sham Transactions Operate?
OFAC identifies numerous methods by which blocked persons conceal their property interest, often by manipulating opaque legal structures and working with proxies. The following are some examples of sham transactions:
- A blocked oligarch transferred ownership of his private jet to a trust, whose sole beneficiary was his unsanctioned wife, while the oligarch continued to use the jet for travel.
- A blocked person transferred millions of dollars of funds into trusts held for his minor children and then attempted to move these funds through U.S. banks.
- Following its designation, a company sanctioned for narcotics trafficking was reincorporated under a different name with new nominal owners while continuing the blocked company’s operations. How Can Financial Institutions Recognize a Sham Transaction?
OFAC’s advisory highlights a non-exhaustive set of red flags that may indicate a sham transaction. The advisory stresses the importance of employing a functional approach, considering the totality of the circumstances, when evaluating a potential sham transaction.
For additional analysis on OFAC guidance, see our related posts here.
The following are some indications financial institutions should be aware of when evaluating a transaction:
- Commercially Unreasonable Transactions: Transfers of property in which a blocked person once held an interest on terms that are commercially unreasonable or at odds with fair market value may indicate a sham transaction.
- Transfer to Family Members or Close Associates: Transfers of property to an individual with close personal or professional ties may indicate that the receiving party is acting as a nominal owner and may be acting on behalf of the transferring party.
- Unclear Purpose: Transfers to an individual with no clear business purpose or relevant expertise with respect to the property at issue may be evidence of a sham transaction.
- Complex Corporate Structures and High -Risk Jurisdictions: The presence of unnecessarily complex corporate structures, particularly in jurisdictions that lack robust regulatory oversight, may suggest an effort to conceal true ownership interests.
- Involvement of a Blocked Person: If the circumstances indicate that a blocked person remains involved in the operation of a property, they may hold a concealed interest. The use of evasive or vague responses regarding the extent of a blocked person’s involvement may present further indicia of a concealed interest.
- Transfer At Time of Designation: If a property or interest is transferred immediately preceding or following a person’s designation by OFAC, the transaction may warrant additional scrutiny. Guidance for Financial Institutions
If financial institutions become aware that a blocked person once held an interest in property, OFAC recommends reviewing the available information to see if any of the above-listed red flags are present. OFAC acknowledges in its advisory that institutions may encounter legitimate business transactions where this occurs and does not wish to interfere with parties and institutions who seek to comply with OFAC sanctions in good faith.
If institutions become aware that a blocked person retains an interest in property that is held within the United States or is in the possession or control of a U.S. person, the property must be blocked and reported to OFAC.
[View source.]
;) ;) Report
Related Posts
- OFAC Sanctions: AML Compliance with DPRK-Linked Activity
- Cracking Down on CJNG: FinCEN’s Alert and OFAC’s Strategic Sanctions on Oil Smuggling
- Fifth Circuit Rejects OFAC Designation of Tornado Cash Immutable Smart Contracts
Latest Posts
- OFAC Issues Advisory Warning on Sham Transactions
- OCC Enters Into Consent Order with Savings Bank Over VA Mortgage Refinance Loan Practices See more »
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
Attorney Advertising.
©
Ballard Spahr LLP
Written by:
Ballard Spahr LLP Contact + Follow Ryan Sullivan + Follow more less
PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA
- ✔ Increased readership
- ✔ Actionable analytics
- ✔ Ongoing writing guidance Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra
Published In:
Anti-Money Laundering + Follow Asset Freeze + Follow Beneficial Owner + Follow Cross-Border Transactions + Follow Economic Sanctions + Follow Financial Institutions + Follow Guidance Documents + Follow New Guidance + Follow Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) + Follow Real Estate Transactions + Follow Reporting Requirements + Follow Risk Management + Follow SDN List + Follow U.S. Treasury + Follow Finance & Banking + Follow International Trade + Follow Commercial Real Estate + Follow more less
Ballard Spahr LLP on:
"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"
Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Sign Up Log in ** By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.* - hide - hide
Related changes
Get daily alerts for JD Supra Finance & Banking
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from Ballard Spahr.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when JD Supra Finance & Banking publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.