Joshua McCarty Insurance License Revoked for Exam Fraud
Summary
Joshua McCarty's insurance license has been permanently revoked by the Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services (DIFS) following his admission that he hired Alicia Jackson to take and pass an online proctored licensing exam on his behalf. The consent order, effective April 22, 2026, cites violations of MCL 500.1239(1)(a) (obtaining a license through misrepresentation or fraud) and MCL 500.1239(1)(g) (fraudulent or dishonest practices demonstrating untrustworthiness). DIFS retains jurisdiction to initiate additional proceedings if McCarty fails to comply with the stipulated terms.
“Respondent admits to hiring and employing Alicia Jackson to take and pass an online proctored licensing exam on Respondent's behalf, justifying sanctions under Sections 1239(1)(a), 1239(1)(g), and 1244 of the Code.”
Michigan insurance license applicants and holders should note that examination fraud—including hiring third parties to take licensing exams—is treated as obtaining a license through misrepresentation under MCL 500.1239(1)(a), triggering immediate revocation as the presumptive sanction. DIFS has demonstrated willingness to pursue these cases to final consent order. License applicants with any concerns about examination integrity should consult DIFS guidance before proceeding.
About this source
GovPing monitors MI DIFS Directors Orders for new banking & finance regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 54 changes logged to date.
What changed
The Order Accepting Stipulation permanently revokes Joshua McCarty's insurance license (System ID No. 1286732) effective immediately. The revocation follows McCarty's admission that he hired Alicia Jackson to take and pass an online proctored insurance licensing exam on his behalf, constituting obtaining a license through misrepresentation under MCL 500.1239(1)(a) and demonstrating untrustworthiness under MCL 500.1239(1)(g). The consent order, signed by McCarty on 04/21/2026 and entered by Senior Deputy Director Joseph A. Garcia on April 22, 2026, gives DIFS continued jurisdiction to pursue further action for non-compliance with the stipulation terms. Insurance license applicants and holders in Michigan should be aware that DIFS treats examination fraud and misrepresentation in the licensing process as serious violations warranting maximum discipline including permanent revocation.
Archived snapshot
Apr 23, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES Before the Director of the Department of Insurance and Financial Services
In the matter of:
Joshua McCarty
System ID No. 1286732 Respondent.
_____________________________/ Issued and entered on April 22, 2026 by Joseph A. Garcia Senior Deputy Director, and General Counsel ORDER ACCEPTING STIPULATION
Based upon the Stipulation to Entry of Order and the files and records of the Department of Insurance and Financial Services (DIFS) in this matter, the Senior Deputy Director finds and concludes that:
- The Senior Deputy Director has jurisdiction and authority to adopt and issue this Order Accepting Stipulation in this proceeding pursuant to the Michigan Administrative Procedures Act of 1969 (APA), as amended, MCL 24.201 et seq., and the Michigan Insurance Code of 1956 (Code), MCL 500.100
et seq.
All required notices have been issued in this case, and the notices and service thereof were
appropriate and lawful in all respects.Acceptance of the Stipulation to Entry of Order is reasonable and in the public interest.
All applicable provisions of the APA have been either satisfied or waived by all Parties.
On or about November 25, 2025, DIFS served a Notice of Opportunity to Show Compliance (NOSC)
on Respondent. In the NOSC, DIFS asserted that Respondent provided justification for sanctions pursuant to Sections 1239(1)(a) and 1239(1)(g) of the Code, MCL 500.1239(1)(a) and MCL 1239(1)(g).Respondent admits that sanctions are warranted under Section 1239(1)(a) of the Code, MCL
500.1239(1)(a), because Respondent attempted to and did obtain a license through misrepresentation or fraud.Respondent admits that sanctions are warranted under Section 1239(1)(g) of the Code, MCL
500.1239(1)(g), because Respondent used fraudulent or dishonest practices and demonstrated untrustworthiness in the conduct of business.
Order Accepting Stipulation Page 2 of 2
- The Director is authorized to take disciplinary action against Respondent's insurance license in addition to the imposition of monetary penalties for the above-described statutory violations pursuant to Sections 1239 and 1244 of the Code, MCL 500.1239 and MCL 500.1244. Now therefore, based upon the Stipulation to Entry of Order and the facts surrounding this case, IT IS
ORDERED THAT:
All agreements contained in the Stipulation to Entry of Order are accepted and adopted in their
entirety.Respondent shall comply with all terms agreed to in the Stipulation to Entry of Order. A failure to
comply with a term in the Stipulation shall be deemed a violation of this Order.Respondent's license is hereby REVOKED, effective immediately.
The Senior Deputy Director retains jurisdiction over the matters contained herein and has the
authority to issue such further order(s) as shall be deemed just, necessary, and appropriate in accordance with the Michigan Insurance Code. Failure to abide by the terms and provisions of the Stipulation to Entry of Order and this Order may result in the commencement of additional proceedings. ____________________________________ Joseph A. Garcia Senior Deputy Director, and General Counsel
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES Before the Director of the Department of Insurance and Financial Services
In the matter of:
Joshua McCarty Enforcement Case No. 25-18634
System ID No. 1286732 Respondent.
_____________________________/ STIPULATION TO ENTRY OF ORDER
Joshua McCarty (Respondent) stipulates to the following:
Respondent had the opportunity to have this Order Accepting Stipulation and Stipulation to Entry of
Order (collectively "Consent Order") reviewed by legal counsel.Respondent has read and understands this Consent Order.
Respondent understands that Respondent has a right to a hearing before an administrative law
judge, at which DIFS would be required to prove the charges set forth by presentation of evidence and legal authority and at which Respondent would be entitled to appear, to cross-examine all witnesses presented by DIFS, and to present such testimony or other evidence or legal authority deemed appropriate as a defense to said charges. Respondent understands and intends that by agreeing to the Consent Order, Respondent is knowingly and voluntarily waiving Respondent's right, pursuant to the Michigan Insurance Code of 1956 (Code), MCL 500.100 et seq., the rules promulgated thereto, and the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), MCL 24.201 et seq., to a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.Respondent agrees that all parties have complied with the procedural requirements of the APA and
the Code.The Senior Deputy Director retains jurisdiction over the matters contained herein.
On or about November 25, 2025, the Department of Insurance and Financial Services (DIFS) served
Respondent with a Notice of Opportunity to Show Compliance (NOSC) alleging that Respondent committed conduct warranting disciplinary action against Respondent's license and monetary penalties pursuant to Sections 1239 and 1244 of the Code, MCL 500.1239 and MCL 500.1244.Respondent admits to hiring and employing Alicia Jackson to take and pass an online proctored
licensing exam on Respondent's behalf, justifying sanctions under Sections 1239(1)(a), 1239(1)(g), and 1244 of the Code.Respondent agrees that, in lieu of further disciplinary action, Respondent's license shall be revoked,
effective immediately upon entry of the Consent Order.
Order Accepting Stipulation Page 2 of 2
- Both parties consent to entry of the Consent Order upon its approval by the Senior Deputy Director.
Respondent understands that this Consent Order will be presented to the Senior Deputy Director for
approval and that the Senior Deputy Director may or may not approve and adopt it. Respondent further agrees that the Senior Deputy Director has jurisdiction and authority to approve and adopt this Consent Order.Respondent waives any objection to the Director deciding this case following a Michigan Office of
Administrative Hearings and Rules hearing in the event that the Consent Order is not approved.
04 / 21 / 2026
__________________________ __________________________ Joshua McCarty Date System ID No. 1286732
DIFS Staff approve this Stipulation and recommend that the Senior Deputy Director accept it and issue an Order Accepting Stipulation.
__________________________ __________________________ William R. Peattie (P-48004) Date DIFS Staff Attorney
4-22-2026
Named provisions
Related changes
Get daily alerts for MI DIFS Directors Orders
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from MI DIFS.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when MI DIFS Directors Orders publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.