IRS Proposes Electronic Delivery Rules for Form 1099-DA
Summary
The US Department of the Treasury and IRS released proposed regulations under Prop. Treas. Reg. § 1.6045-1(k) establishing requirements for electronic delivery of Form 1099-DA (Digital Asset Proceeds) on March 6, 2026. Digital asset brokers seeking to furnish Form 1099-DA electronically must obtain affirmative, standalone customer consent with detailed disclosures covering scope, hardware/software requirements, delivery methods, notification procedures, consequences of non-consent, withdrawal rights, and access to information. Comments on the proposed regulations are due May 5, 2026.
Digital asset brokers currently using integrated platforms that furnish both Form 1099-DA and Form 1099-B should audit their consent management systems now, as the proposed rules require separate consent regimes for each form. Firms should also verify their fallback procedures can meet the 30-day mail requirement for undeliverable electronic communications before these rules finalize.
About this source
GovPing monitors JD Supra Finance & Banking for new banking & finance regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 391 changes logged to date.
What changed
The proposed regulations establish a comprehensive framework for electronic delivery of Form 1099-DA, allowing brokers to furnish statements electronically without a paper alternative provided customers give affirmative, standalone consent through a clear explicit action such as checking a box or clicking a button. Brokers must disclose scope of consent, hardware and software requirements, delivery method, notification procedures, consequences of non-consent, withdrawal rights, and access to information. If material changes to hardware or software occur, brokers must obtain new consent.
Digital asset brokers, trading platforms, hosted wallet providers, and payment processors within the expanded broker definition should evaluate consent collection workflows, technology systems for secure delivery, procedures for handling failed deliveries, and coordination with existing Form 1099-B compliance processes. Brokers that furnish both Form 1099-DA and Form 1099-B must comply with separate consent regimes for each form.
Archived snapshot
Apr 22, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
April 22, 2026
IRS Proposes New Rules for Electronic Delivery of Digital Asset Payee Statements
Anthony Cipriano, Maya A. Hairston, Richard LaFalce Morgan Lewis + Follow Contact LinkedIn Facebook X ;) Embed
The US Department of the Treasury and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released proposed regulations establishing a comprehensive framework for the electronic delivery of Form 1099-DA (Digital Asset Proceeds) on March 6, 2026. The proposal reflects the government’s continued effort to modernize reporting obligations for digital asset brokers while setting detailed requirements for taxpayer consent, disclosures, and delivery mechanics.
The proposed rules are particularly relevant for digital asset trading platforms, hosted wallet providers, and certain payment processors that fall within the expanded definition of “broker.”
Consistent with prior IRS digital asset guidance highlighted in earlier Morgan Lewis LawFlashes [1] —including discussions of proposed digital asset broker reporting regulations and evolving compliance frameworks—the newly proposed rules under Prop. Treas. Reg. § 1.6045-1(k) further refine the operational expectations for brokers in this space. In particular, the proposal reflects a continued shift toward electronic-first reporting regimes, while layering in detailed consent, disclosure, and delivery requirements that may significantly affect broker compliance processes and customer interactions.
This regulatory guidance is welcome, as it has been over four years since Congress amended the “broker” definition in Section 6045 to include digital asset brokers in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. [2]
Below are key highlights of the proposed rules.
EXPANDED FLEXIBILITY FOR ELECTRONIC DELIVERY—WITH STRICT CONSENT REQUIREMENTS
Under the proposed regulations, brokers may furnish Form 1099-DA statements electronically without offering a paper alternative, provided customers give affirmative, standalone consent. This consent must be obtained through a clear, explicit action—such as checking a box, clicking a button, or completing an electronic form. The proposal builds on general Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce (ESIGN) Act principles but imposes more detailed, tax-specific consent and disclosure requirements.
When requesting consent, brokers must provide detailed disclosures addressing the following:
- Scope of Consent – Whether it applies to all Form 1099-DA statements issued by the broker
- Hardware and Software Requirements – Systems needed to access, download, and print statements
- Delivery Method – The specific electronic method the broker will use
- Notification Procedures – How and when customers will receive notice (e.g., email), including the ability to update notification preferences
- Consequences of Non-Consent – Any service limitations imposed on customers who decline electronic delivery
- Withdrawal Rights – Whether consent can be withdrawn and, if so, how and when it becomes effective
- Access to Information – Where customers can find these disclosures in the future If material changes to required hardware or software take place, brokers must obtain new customer consent. Notably, brokers seeking to electronically furnish both Form 1099-DA and Form 1099-B must comply with separate consent regimes for each form. This requirement may complicate onboarding and consent management for brokers that furnish both forms through integrated platforms.
HANDLING CUSTOMER REFUSAL OF ELECTRONIC DELIVERY
Notably, under these proposed regulations, if a customer declines to consent, the proposed regulations permit brokers to limit or terminate services rather than provide paper statements, as long as the broker has provided clear prior disclosure in the consent process. However, brokers must still furnish paper statements for prior transactions before consent was denied.
PERMISSIBLE DELIVERY METHODS AND SPECIAL RULES
The proposal identifies two acceptable electronic delivery methods: (1) Posting statements to an online account, coupled with a mandatory email notice; and (2) direct email delivery of the statement.
Customers may request additional notifications via alternative channels (e.g., mail).
A special rule applies to brokers operating exclusively through kiosks or acting as digital asset payment processors. These brokers must send disclosure statements via email, mail, or private delivery service within five business days of receiving consent and offer customers the option to request additional communication methods.
FALLBACK PROCEDURES FOR UNDELIVERABLE COMMUNICATIONS
The proposed regulations impose strict fallback requirements when electronic delivery fails: Brokers must promptly resend notices to a corrected email address, or mail the statement or notice within 30 days.
For corrected statements, brokers must provide notice within five business days.
ACCESS, RETENTION, AND TIMING REQUIREMENTS
The proposed rules align Form 1099-DA timing with existing Section 6045 requirements:
- Furnishing Deadline – February 15 of the year following or consistent with existing Section 6045 deadlines, as applicable
- Online Availability – Statements must remain accessible through October 15 of that year
- Record Retention – Brokers must retain and provide statements upon request for seven years
NEXT STEPS FOR DIGITAL ASSET BROKERS
The proposed regulations introduce a simultaneously flexible but compliance-intensive framework for electronic delivery of Forms 1099-DA. In light of these proposed regulations, brokers should begin evaluating the following:
- Consent collection workflows and disclosure language
- Technology systems for secure delivery and long-term access
- Procedures for handling failed deliveries and customer preferences
- Coordination with existing Form 1099-B compliance processes The proposed regulations are not yet effective; however, taxpayers may generally rely on them pending finalization, and the rules are expected to apply to Forms 1099-DA furnished for transactions occurring in the first applicable reporting year after final regulations are issued.
If finalized, these regulations will significantly shape how digital asset brokers manage customer communications and reporting obligations. Brokers should also assess cybersecurity and data protection implications associated with different delivery methods, particularly email-based delivery.
Comments and requests for public hearing regarding these proposed regulations are due May 5, 2026.
[1] Richard LaFalce et al., New IRS Guidance Provides a Spot of Certainty Amid Digital Asset Limbo, Morgan Lewis (Jan. 19, 2024); Richard LaFalce et al., IRS Releases Proposed Digital Asset Regulations, Morgan Lewis (Sept. 2023); Richard LaFalce et al., Digital Asset Brokers: Proceed with Caution, Morgan Lewis (Dec. 2022); Sarah-Jane Morin et al., How the Definition of Digital Asset Brokers Was Brokered, Tax Notes Federal (Aug. 29, 2022).
[2] P.L. 117-58.
[View source.]
;) ;) Report
Related Posts
- An Antitrust Primer for Companies Innovating with Digital Assets
- Bipartisan Majorities in Two House Committees Vote to Advance the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act of 2025
- US Administration, Congress, and SEC and CFTC Leadership Push for Unified Digital Asset Framework
Latest Posts
- IRS Proposes New Rules for Electronic Delivery of Digital Asset Payee Statements
- Strategic IP Considerations for the Medtech Market Rebound After Record Investment and M&A in 2025 See more »
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
Attorney Advertising.
©
Morgan Lewis
Written by:
Morgan Lewis Contact + Follow Anthony Cipriano + Follow Maya A. Hairston + Follow Richard LaFalce + Follow more less
PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA
- ✔ Increased readership
- ✔ Actionable analytics
- ✔ Ongoing writing guidance Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra
Published In:
Cryptoassets + Follow Digital Assets + Follow Disclosure Requirements + Follow Filing Deadlines + Follow Income Taxes + Follow IRS + Follow New Regulations + Follow Proposed Rules + Follow Regulatory Requirements + Follow Reporting Requirements + Follow Taxation + Follow U.S. Treasury + Follow Finance & Banking + Follow Tax + Follow more less
Morgan Lewis on:
"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"
Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Sign Up Log in ** By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.* - hide - hide
CFR references
Named provisions
Mentioned entities
Related changes
Get daily alerts for JD Supra Finance & Banking
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from Morgan Lewis.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when JD Supra Finance & Banking publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.