Stored Payment Credentials and ROSCA: Lessons from FTC Uber Case
Summary
This law firm analysis article examines the FTC's lawsuit against Uber Technologies regarding its 'Uber One' subscription program. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California denied Uber's motion to dismiss, ruling that Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act (ROSCA) disclosures must be presented before obtaining consumers' billing information, not simultaneously with authorizing charges to stored payment methods. The court found that autofilled billing information does not satisfy ROSCA's sequencing requirements. The article advises companies to ensure subscription disclosures precede the use of stored payment credentials.
What changed
This article analyzes a court decision interpreting ROSCA's disclosure timing requirements in the context of stored payment credentials. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California denied Uber's motion to dismiss, finding that presenting subscription terms simultaneously with charging a stored payment method may not satisfy ROSCA's requirement that material terms be disclosed before obtaining billing information. The court distinguished between having disclosures available and ensuring consumers see them before stored credentials are used.
For companies using stored payment credentials for subscription enrollments, the article identifies key compliance risks: enrollment flows that display terms on the same screen authorizing charges to existing payment methods may violate ROSCA's sequencing requirements. The court suggested that providing an affirmative opt-in step after disclosures but before using stored credentials might reduce legal exposure. Companies should review subscription, upsell, and reactivation flows for timing of disclosures relative to payment authorization.
Archived snapshot
Apr 18, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
April 17, 2026
Stored Payment Credentials and ROSCA: Lessons from the FTC’s Uber Case
Shahin Rothermel, Ellen Traupman Berge Venable LLP + Follow Contact LinkedIn Facebook X ;) Embed
From one-click checkouts to autofilled payment fields, the modern payment experience is built on convenience. Consumers have come to expect that apps, websites, and even their mobile devices will seamlessly store and deploy their payment credentials with minimal friction. But beneath this ease lies a growing legal tension, particularly in subscriptions and automatic renewals programs, where sales and marketing laws require clear disclosures before obtaining the consumer’s billing information.
ROSCA Compliance and Subscription Disclosure Timing
The Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) lawsuit against Uber Technologies illustrates how this tension plays out in practice. The case focuses on Uber’s “Uber One” subscription program and how subscription enrollment is embedded within an app ecosystem where users have already stored payment credentials for one-off transactions. Under the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act (ROSCA), material subscription terms must be disclosed before obtaining consumers’ billing information.
In denying Uber’s motion to dismiss, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California rejected Uber’s argument that ROSCA’s requirements were satisfied because consumers could use autofilled billing information already on file. Instead, the court signaled that the sequencing matters: disclosures must come before the use of billing information, not alongside or after it.
How the FTC Uber Lawsuit Shapes Compliance
The decision builds on prior cases emphasizing that ROSCA is not just about whether disclosures exist, but when and how they are presented. The court pointed to allegations that Uber displayed subscription terms on the same screen that authorized charges to a preexisting payment method and suggested that this “simultaneous” presentation may be insufficient unless companies take additional measures to strengthen disclosures and consent.
The decision does not go so far as to prohibit the use of stored payment credentials in subscription enrollments. But it reinforces the narrow and important point that timing is critical. The Uber case follows a similar ruling in the Western District of Washington, where the court held that presenting disclosures at the same time as obtaining consent to use stored payment information was insufficient under ROSCA.
Drawing on that precedent, the Uber court emphasized that showing subscription terms on the same screen that authorizes charges to a preexisting payment method may not meet the statute’s requirements. At the same time, the court suggested a possible path forward, noting that the analysis “might be different” if consumers were given a clear opportunity to affirmatively opt in to using stored payment credentials after reviewing the required disclosures.
Designing Lower-Risk Subscription Enrollment Flows
- Provide Disclosures Early and Before the Payment Is Selected. It is increasingly risky to present material terms while a pre-selected or default payment method is being used
- Affirmative Choice Matters. A separate step that asks consumers to confirm or select their payment method after reviewing disclosures might reduce risk. The issue seems to turn on whether consumers are given a meaningful opportunity to review disclosures before those credentials are used
- Context Matters. Courts are paying attention to the broader user experience, particularly where subscription offers are embedded in flows designed for one-time transactions These steps can reduce risk but considering courts’ extreme scrutiny and hypertextual reading of the law, any use of stored payment information to enroll someone in a subscription presents risk. And companies should be prepared to apply these requirements to upsells and reactivations
Learn more by checking out a recent webinar presented by Venable’s Autorenewal Solutions Team (VAST).
The Bottom Line
The decision makes clear that convenience features cannot override ROSCA’s sequencing requirements. The use of stored payment credentials remains permissible, but only if the enrollment flow ensures that consumers see—and have a real opportunity to act on—material terms before those credentials are used.
As enforcement and private litigation continue to focus on subscription practices, companies should review their sign-up flows with particular attention to timing, not just disclosure content.
;) ;) Report
Related Posts
- FTC v. Uber: California Court Allows Claims against Uber One Subscription to Proceed
- FTC Lawsuit Targets JustAnswer for Alleged ROSCA and Subscription Disclosure Violations
- FTC Targets “Merchant of Record” for Unlawful Payment Processing, TSR, and ROSCA Violations
- Vonage, Autorenewals, and the FTC’s Ever-Expanding Interpretation of ROSCA
Latest Posts
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
Attorney Advertising.
©
Venable LLP
Written by:
Venable LLP Contact + Follow Shahin Rothermel + Follow Ellen Traupman Berge + Follow more less
PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA
- ✔ Increased readership
- ✔ Actionable analytics
- ✔ Ongoing writing guidance Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra
Published In:
Automatic Renewals + Follow Consumer Protection Laws + Follow Disclosure Requirements + Follow E-Commerce + Follow Enforcement Actions + Follow Federal Trade Commission (FTC) + Follow Mobile Payments + Follow Payment Processors + Follow Payment Systems + Follow ROSCA + Follow Subscription Services + Follow Unfair or Deceptive Trade Practices + Follow Antitrust & Trade Regulation + Follow General Business + Follow Consumer Protection + Follow Finance & Banking + Follow more less
Venable LLP on:
"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"
Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Sign Up Log in ** By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.* - hide - hide
Related changes
Get daily alerts for JD Supra Finance & Banking
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from Venable LLP.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when JD Supra Finance & Banking publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.