Changeflow GovPing Banking & Finance FINRA Fines Brokerage Firm $450,000 for BSA/AML...
Routine Notice Amended Final

FINRA Fines Brokerage Firm $450,000 for BSA/AML Deficiencies

Favicon for www.jdsupra.com JD Supra Finance & Banking
Published
Detected
Email

Summary

FINRA accepted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver, and Consent (AWC) from online brokerage firm Stash Capital LLC, censuring and fining the firm $450,000 for alleged deficiencies in its anti-money laundering program, customer identification program, and identity-theft prevention program. The alleged violations spanned January 2019 through June 2023 and included failures in account opening, suspicious activity detection, and identity-theft red flags. The AWC alleged violations of the Bank Secrecy Act, FINRA Rules 3310 and 2010, and Regulation S-ID.

Published by Sheppard Mullin on jdsupra.com . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

What changed

FINRA enforcement action against Stash Capital LLC resulted in a $450,000 fine for alleged deficiencies in BSA/AML compliance, customer identification program, and identity-theft prevention spanning over four years. Key alleged failures included approving accounts without sufficient identity verification, over-reliance on automated alerts focused on large transactions without linking account-opening red flags to ongoing monitoring, and failure to timely identify patterns involving shared phone numbers, shared inboxes, and temporary email domains.\n\nBroker-dealers and other firms offering digital onboarding should review whether red flags identified at account opening are incorporated into ongoing transaction monitoring and escalation processes. Federal regulators continue to scrutinize whether financial institutions' BSA/AML, customer identification, and fraud-prevention controls are reasonably designed for the size and nature of their businesses.

What to do next

  1. Monitor for updates

Penalties

$450,000 fine

Archived snapshot

Apr 13, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

April 13, 2026

FINRA Fines Brokerage Firm $450,000 for Alleged BSA/AML Program Deficiencies

A.J.S. Dhaliwal, Mehul Madia, Maxwell Earp-Thomas Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP + Follow Contact LinkedIn Facebook X Send Embed

On March 20, FINRA accepted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver, and Consent (AWC) with an online brokerage firm, censuring and fining the firm $450,000 for alleged deficiencies in its anti-money laundering program, customer identification program, and identity-theft prevention program. According to the AWC, FINRA alleged violations of the Bank Secrecy Act, FINRA Rules 3310 and 2010, and Regulation S-ID.

According to FINRA, the alleged deficiencies spanned January 2019 through June 2023 and arose during a period of rapid growth in the firm’s online brokerage business. The AWC states that FINRA viewed the firm’s written policies, procedures, and controls as not reasonably designed for the size and nature of its customer base, particularly in connection with account opening, suspicious activity detection, and identity-theft red flags.

Key allegations include:

  • Customer identification deficiencies. FINRA alleged that the firm did not maintain a reasonably designed customer identification program and approved certain accounts without sufficiently verifying customer identity.
  • Suspicious activity monitoring deficiencies. FINRA alleged that the firm’s AML monitoring relied too heavily on automated alerts focused on large or frequent deposits and withdrawals, without adequate procedures connecting account-opening red flags to later account activity. The AWC also states that the firm failed to timely identify patterns involving shared phone numbers, shared inboxes, and temporary email domains.
  • Identity-theft program deficiencies. FINRA alleged that, prior to October 2021, the firm primarily relied on customers to self-report identity theft and did not timely update its written Identity Theft Prevention Program even after learning of potential fraud methods. Putting It Into Practice: Federal regulators continue to scrutinize whether financial institutions’ BSA/AML, customer identification, and fraud-prevention controls are reasonably designed for the size and nature of their businesses (previously discussed here). Broker-dealers and other firms offering digital onboarding should review whether red flags identified at account opening are incorporated into ongoing transaction monitoring and escalation processes.

Send Print Report

Related Posts

Latest Posts

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
Attorney Advertising.

©
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Written by:

Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP Contact + Follow A.J.S. Dhaliwal + Follow Mehul Madia + Follow Maxwell Earp-Thomas + Follow more less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA

  • ✔ Increased readership
  • ✔ Actionable analytics
  • ✔ Ongoing writing guidance Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra

Start Publishing »

Published In:

Anti-Money Laundering + Follow Bank Secrecy Act + Follow Broker-Dealer + Follow Brokerage Accounts + Follow BSA/AML + Follow Compliance Monitoring + Follow Customer Identification Program (CIP) + Follow Enforcement Actions + Follow Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) + Follow Financial Services Industry + Follow Identity Theft + Follow Regulation S-ID + Follow Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) + Follow General Business + Follow Finance & Banking + Follow Securities + Follow more less

Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP on:

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Sign Up Log in ** By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.* - hide - hide

Get daily alerts for JD Supra Finance & Banking

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from Sheppard Mullin.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
Sheppard Mullin
Published
April 13th, 2026
Instrument
Notice
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Substantive
Document ID
2022076038801

Who this affects

Applies to
Broker-dealers Investors
Industry sector
5231 Securities & Investments
Activity scope
AML compliance Customer identification program Identity theft prevention
Geographic scope
United States US

Taxonomy

Primary area
Anti-Money Laundering
Operational domain
Compliance
Compliance frameworks
BSA/AML
Topics
Securities Consumer Finance

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when JD Supra Finance & Banking publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!