Changeflow GovPing Banking & Finance FinCEN Proposes Major Revisions to AML/CFT Prog...
Routine Notice Added Consultation

FinCEN Proposes Major Revisions to AML/CFT Program Requirements

Favicon for www.jdsupra.com JD Supra Finance & Banking
Published
Detected
Email

Summary

FinCEN announced a proposed rule on April 7, 2026, that would significantly revise anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) program requirements for financial institutions under the Bank Secrecy Act. The proposal would require effective AML/CFT programs, emphasize risk-based resource allocation, mandate documented risk-assessment processes, and expand FinCEN's role in bank supervision. If adopted, the rule would supersede FinCEN's July 2024 AML/CFT program proposal and affect how banks, fintechs, money services businesses, broker-dealers, and other covered entities design AML/CFT programs.

Published by Sheppard Mullin on jdsupra.com . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

What changed

FinCEN has proposed a rule that would fundamentally reform AML/CFT program requirements for financial institutions, introducing new standards for program effectiveness, risk-based resource allocation, and documented risk-assessment processes. The proposal would formally distinguish between establishing and maintaining an AML/CFT program, with particular significance for bank supervision and enforcement.

Affected entities—including banks, fintechs, money services businesses, broker-dealers, and other covered institutions—should review current AML/CFT program governance, risk-assessment processes, and escalation frameworks now to prepare for evaluating the proposal and submitting comments. The rule would expand FinCEN's role in bank supervision by requiring federal banking agencies to provide FinCEN notice and opportunity to consult before taking certain significant AML/CFT supervisory actions.

Archived snapshot

Apr 18, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

April 17, 2026

FinCEN Proposes Major Revisions to AML/CFT Program Requirements

A.J.S. Dhaliwal, Mehul Madia, Maxwell Earp-Thomas Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP + Follow Contact LinkedIn Facebook X ;) Embed

On April 7, FinCEN announced a proposed rule that would significantly revise anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) program requirements for financial institutions under the Bank Secrecy Act.

The proposal is framed as a broader effort to modernize AML/CFT compliance and supervision, reduce unnecessary compliance burden, and shift attention away from technical process issues and toward program effectiveness. FinCEN also states that the rule would supersede its July 2024 AML/CFT program proposal. Specifically, the proposal would:

  • Require “effective” AML/CFT programs. FinCEN would formally distinguish between establishing an AML/CFT program and maintaining it through implementation in all material respects, with that distinction carrying particular significance for bank supervision and enforcement.
  • Emphasize risk-based resource allocation. Financial institutions would be expected to direct more attention and resources to higher-risk customers and activities, consistent with their risk profiles, rather than devoting the same level of effort to lower-risk areas.
  • Require documented risk-assessment processes. As part of their internal policies, procedures, and controls, institutions would need processes to assess money-laundering and terrorist-financing risks, review and appropriately incorporate AML/CFT priorities, and update those processes when risk profiles materially change.
  • Expand FinCEN’s role in bank supervision. For banks, the proposal would require federal banking agencies to provide FinCEN notice and an opportunity to consult before taking certain significant AML/CFT supervisory actions. Putting It Into Practice: This proposal continues a broader trend of federal agencies revisiting supervisory frameworks and recalibrating how compliance obligations are evaluated (previously discussed here and here). If adopted, the rule could affect how banks, fintechs, money services businesses, broker-dealers, and other covered entities design AML/CFT programs, allocate compliance resources, document risk judgments, and respond to supervisory findings. Institutions should consider reviewing current AML/CFT program governance, risk-assessment processes, and escalation frameworks now so they are better positioned to evaluate the proposal and prepare comments or implementation updates as necessary.

;) ;) Report

Related Posts

Latest Posts

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
Attorney Advertising.

©
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Written by:

Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP Contact + Follow A.J.S. Dhaliwal + Follow Mehul Madia + Follow Maxwell Earp-Thomas + Follow more less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA

  • ✔ Increased readership
  • ✔ Actionable analytics
  • ✔ Ongoing writing guidance Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra

Start Publishing »

Published In:

AML/CFT + Follow Anti-Money Laundering + Follow Bank Secrecy Act + Follow Banking Sector + Follow Compliance + Follow Financial Institutions + Follow FinCEN + Follow Money Laundering + Follow Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) + Follow Proposed Rules + Follow Regulatory Oversight + Follow Regulatory Reform + Follow Risk Assessment + Follow Risk Management + Follow Administrative Agency + Follow Finance & Banking + Follow more less

Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP on:

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Sign Up Log in ** By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.* - hide - hide

Get daily alerts for JD Supra Finance & Banking

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from Sheppard Mullin.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
Sheppard Mullin
Published
April 7th, 2026
Instrument
Notice
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Consultation
Change scope
Minor
Supersedes
2024 AML/CFT program proposal

Who this affects

Applies to
Banks Financial advisers
Industry sector
5221 Commercial Banking 5222 Fintech & Digital Payments 5231 Securities & Investments
Activity scope
AML/CFT compliance Risk assessment Bank supervision
Geographic scope
United States US

Taxonomy

Primary area
Anti-Money Laundering
Operational domain
Compliance
Compliance frameworks
BSA/AML
Topics
Banking Financial Services Securities

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when JD Supra Finance & Banking publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!