Changeflow GovPing Banking & Finance Fed, FDIC, OCC Revise Risk Management Model Gui...
Priority review Notice Added Final

Fed, FDIC, OCC Revise Risk Management Model Guidance

Favicon for bankingjournal.aba.com ABA Banking Journal Compliance
Published
Detected
Email

Summary

The Federal Reserve, FDIC, and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency have rescinded existing interagency model risk management guidance and replaced it with revised principles that better account for a financial institution's size and complexity. The new guidance clarifies that model risk management should be tailored commensurately to the size, complexity, and model risk profile of a banking organization, with expanded coverage of third-party and vendor products. The agencies explicitly stated that the guidance does not establish enforceable standards, prescriptive requirements, and non-compliance will not result in supervisory criticism.

Published by ABA on bankingjournal.aba.com . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

What changed

The Federal Reserve, FDIC, and OCC jointly issued revised interagency model risk management guidance, rescinding prior guidance and replacing it with updated principles. The new guidance clarifies that model risk management frameworks should be scaled to the size, complexity, and model risk profile of each banking organization, with expanded discussion of vendor and third-party products. Notably, the guidance explicitly excludes generative and agentic AI from its scope, with agencies planning a separate RFI on AI use.

Affected parties: Banks of all sizes, particularly community banks, should review the revised principles to understand updated regulatory expectations for model risk management. The guidance is non-binding and non-compliance will not result in supervisory criticism, but institutions should assess whether existing model risk frameworks align with the new tailored approach. Banks using AI should note these systems are outside current guidance scope pending future agency action.

Archived snapshot

Apr 18, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

No Result View All Result

April 17, 2026 Reading Time: 2 mins read The federal banking agencies today rescinded existing risk management model guidance and replaced it with revised principles that they said better account for a financial institution’s size and complexity.

The new guidance by the Federal Reserve, FDIC and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency “clarifies that model risk management should be tailored commensurately to the size, complexity and model risk profile of a banking organization,” according to a statement. The revised guidance highlights sound principles for effective model risk management, and it discusses considerations specific to vendor and other third-party products.

The guidance does not establish enforceable standards or prescriptive requirements, and non-compliance will not result in supervisory criticism, the agencies said.

“In many cases, banks’ use of artificial intelligence is evaluated under this framework, and prior guidance predated significant technological developments, including generative AI,” he said. “This created a great deal of regulatory uncertainty and adversely impacted banks’ ability to innovate.”

Nichols added that ABA has consistently urged regulators to update the guidance to provide additional clarity about regulatory expectations given developments in the market, the broader AI technology stack and bank internal controls.

“The revised guidance will help banks of all sizes, particularly community banks, continue to pursue responsible innovation by making it clear generative and agentic AI are outside the scope of the guidance,” he said. “We appreciate that the federal banking agencies are planning to issue a request for information focusing on banks’ use of AI, including generative AI and agentic AI.”

Tags: Anti-money laundering Bank Secrecy Act FDIC Federal Reserve OCC Risk management Sanctions Share Tweet Pin

Related Posts

ABA: Illinois interchange law will ‘wreck havoc’ on payment systems

Legal April 17, 2026 If enforcement of an Illinois law restricting interchange fees is not prevented before July 1, it will upend the debit- and credit-card operations of federally chartered financial institutions and wreak havoc on the national payment-processing system, ABA, the...

ABA supports deregulatory approach in proposed CFPB strategic plan

Newsbytes April 17, 2026 The CFPB's new focus on reversing regulatory overreach and reducing unnecessary regulatory burdens will help make financial services more affordable and accessible for consumers, ABA said in response to the bureau’s draft strategic plan.

ABA DataBank: Workplace use of generative AI

Economy April 17, 2026 Overall, generative AI adoption remains widely uneven across the workforce.

ABA urges community bank relief on CECL accounting standard

Community Banking April 17, 2026 In a new letter to the Financial Accounting Standards Board related to implementation issues of the Current Expected Credit Loss accounting standard, ABA emphasized that “a consistent message has emerged: for community banks, CECL costs far outweigh its...

RCC Preview: Flipping the script on traditional tech risk in banking

Compliance and Risk April 17, 2026 In the first part in a series, a risk and compliance expert discusses how technology risk in the financial sector increasingly defies traditional definitions and compliance efforts, and how banks can move beyond siloed thinking.

FHLBs propose allowing letters of credit for discount window advances

Community Banking April 17, 2026 Federal Home Loan Bank members should be allowed to use short-term FHLB letters of credit to secure advances through the Federal Reserve’s discount window, the Council of FHLBs suggested in a recent letter to FHFA Director Bill Pulte.

NEWSBYTES

ABA: Illinois interchange law will ‘wreck havoc’ on payment systems

April 17, 2026

Banking agencies issue revised risk management model guidance

April 17, 2026

ABA supports deregulatory approach in proposed CFPB strategic plan

April 17, 2026

SPONSORED CONTENT

How leading banks are enhancing customer engagement through financial data insights

April 10, 2026

Check Fraud Is Outpacing Legacy Controls. What Banks Should Evaluate Now.

April 1, 2026

How top agricultural lenders are approaching AI, automation and innovation in 2026

March 2, 2026

Top 7 FP&A Trends in Banking for 2026

March 1, 2026

PODCASTS

Podcast: Capitalizing on opportunities to serve high-net-worth clients

April 9, 2026

Podcast: Are credit union commercial loans risky business?

March 30, 2026

Podcast: Risk and strategy in sponsor banking

March 19, 2026
American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2026 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result View All Result

Named provisions

Interagency Model Risk Management Guidance

Get daily alerts for ABA Banking Journal Compliance

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from ABA.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
ABA
Published
April 17th, 2026
Instrument
Notice
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Substantive
Supersedes
Prior interagency model risk management guidance

Who this affects

Applies to
Banks
Industry sector
5221 Commercial Banking
Activity scope
Risk management guidance Model risk management Third-party products
Geographic scope
United States US

Taxonomy

Primary area
Banking
Operational domain
Compliance
Compliance frameworks
Basel III
Topics
Risk Management Cybersecurity

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when ABA Banking Journal Compliance publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!