Changeflow GovPing Banking & Finance FDIC and OCC Issue Final Rule Prohibiting Use o...
Routine Notice Added Final

FDIC and OCC Issue Final Rule Prohibiting Use of Reputation Risk by Regulators

Favicon for www.jdsupra.com JD Supra Finance & Banking
Published
Detected
Email

Summary

On April 7, 2026, the FDIC and OCC jointly issued a final rule eliminating reputation risk as a basis for supervisory criticism or adverse action against insured depository institutions, effective June 9, 2026. The rule defines adverse action broadly to include negative examination feedback, enforcement actions, supervisory rating downgrades, filing denials, and capital requirement impositions, and explicitly addresses debanking by prohibiting examiners from pressuring banks to close customer accounts based on political, religious, or social views. Financial institutions serving or considering serving industries historically subjected to examiner pressure now have a regulatory backstop against that supervisory influence.

“The Final Rule prohibits the agencies from criticizing or taking adverse action against an institution on the basis of "reputation risk," which is defined as any risk that could "negatively impact public perception of the institution for reasons not clearly and directly related to the financial or operational condition of the institution."”

Goodwin , verbatim from source
Published by Goodwin on jdsupra.com . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

About this source

GovPing monitors JD Supra Finance & Banking for new banking & finance regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 391 changes logged to date.

What changed

This JD Supra article reports on the FDIC and OCC's final rule prohibiting the use of reputation risk as a basis for supervisory criticism or adverse action against regulated institutions. The rule defines reputation risk as any risk negatively impacting public perception for reasons not clearly tied to financial or operational condition, and defines adverse action expansively to include verbal feedback, enforcement actions, rating downgrades, and capital requirement impositions. The article notes the rule responds to concerns about debanking – pressuring banks to close accounts based on political, religious, or social views. For banks, the rule removes a key tool examiners previously used to influence business decisions regarding customers or industries deemed politically disfavored, providing regulatory cover for institutions considering serving previously pressured sectors.

Archived snapshot

Apr 22, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

April 22, 2026

FDIC and OCC Issue Final Rule Prohibiting Use of Reputation Risk by Regulators

Claire Daly Goodwin + Follow Contact LinkedIn Facebook X ;) Embed

On April 7, 2026, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) jointly issued a final rule (Final Rule) codifying the elimination of reputation risk from their supervisory programs – a shift in the agencies’ supervisory philosophy that places limits on how examiners may evaluate regulated institutions. The Final Rule takes effect June 9, 2026.

The Final Rule prohibits the agencies from criticizing or taking adverse action against an institution on the basis of “reputation risk,” which is defined as any risk that could “negatively impact public perception of the institution for reasons not clearly and directly related to the financial or operational condition of the institution.” 12 CFR § 4.91(g) (OCC); 12 CFR § 302.100(g) (FDIC). This definition expressly carves out public perception concerns that are tied to an institution’s actual financial or operational condition, which the agencies attribute to fundamental financial concerns rather than non-financial reputational issues.

The Final Rule defines “adverse action” expansively to include, among other things:

  • negative feedback in a report of examination,
  • a memorandum of understanding,
  • verbal feedback,
  • an enforcement action,
  • a downgrade of any supervisory rating,
  • a denial of a filing or licensing application, and
  • any imposition of a capital requirement above minimum ratios. Explaining its rationale, the Final Rule notes that the use of reputation risk as a basis for supervisory criticisms “increases subjectivity in banking supervision without adding material value from a safety and soundness perspective.” Because the agencies have not been able to clearly articulate the criteria for which activities or clients are deemed to present a reputation risk, supervision has been inconsistent and has at times “reflected individual perspectives of agency staff rather than data-driven conclusions.”

The Final Rule also addresses “debanking” – the practice of pressuring banks to close customer accounts based on a person’s political, religious, or social views, constitutionally protected speech, or lawful (but politically disfavored) business activities. The Final Rule responds to concerns expressed in Executive Order 14331, Guaranteeing Fair Banking for All Americans, that reputation risk can be “a pretext for restricting law-abiding individuals’ and businesses’ access to financial services on the basis of political or religious beliefs or lawful business activities.”

Financial institutions that serve, or have considered serving, industries historically subjected to examiner pressure now have a regulatory backstop against that pressure. While the Final Rule does not compel banks to do or avoid any particular business, it removes a key tool that examiners used, often subjectively, to influence those decisions. Financial institutions should assess whether past account closure or de-risking decisions were shaped by reputation risk concerns and consider what the new supervisory landscape means for their existing and prospective customer relationships.

[View source.]

;) ;) Report

Related Posts

Latest Posts

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
Attorney Advertising.

©
Goodwin

Written by:

Goodwin Contact + Follow Claire Daly + Follow more less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA

  • ✔ Increased readership
  • ✔ Actionable analytics
  • ✔ Ongoing writing guidance Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra

Start Publishing »

Published In:

Banking Examinations + Follow Banking Sector + Follow Executive Orders + Follow FDIC + Follow Final Rules + Follow Financial Services Industry + Follow Insured Depository Institutions + Follow OCC + Follow Regulatory Oversight + Follow Regulatory Reform + Follow Reputation Management + Follow Risk Management + Follow Supervision + Follow Administrative Agency + Follow Finance & Banking + Follow more less

Goodwin on:

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Sign Up Log in ** By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.* - hide - hide

CFR references

12 CFR § 4.91(g) 12 CFR § 302.100(g)

Named provisions

Reputation Risk Prohibition Debanking Adverse Action Definition

Get daily alerts for JD Supra Finance & Banking

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from Goodwin.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
Goodwin
Published
April 7th, 2026
Compliance deadline
June 9th, 2026 (48 days)
Instrument
Notice
Branch
Executive
Joint with
FDIC OCC
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor

Who this affects

Applies to
Banks
Industry sector
5221 Commercial Banking
Activity scope
Bank supervision Regulatory examinations Account de-risking
Geographic scope
United States US

Taxonomy

Primary area
Banking
Operational domain
Compliance
Compliance frameworks
Dodd-Frank
Topics
Consumer Finance Risk Management Sanctions

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when JD Supra Finance & Banking publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!