Changeflow GovPing Banking & Finance CFTC Files Amicus Brief in Massachusetts Suprem...
Priority review Notice Added Final

CFTC Files Amicus Brief in Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Defending Prediction Market Jurisdiction

Favicon for www.cftc.gov CFTC Press Releases
Published
Detected
Email

Summary

The CFTC filed an amicus brief in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court on April 24, 2026, reaffirming its exclusive jurisdiction over U.S. commodity derivatives markets, including event contract prediction markets. The filing is part of a broader CFTC campaign against state encroachment, which includes lawsuits against Arizona, Connecticut, Illinois, and New York, with a temporary restraining order secured against state regulation in Arizona. The CFTC argues that the comprehensive framework of the Commodity Exchange Act preempts state laws as applied to CFTC-regulated markets.

Why this matters

Prediction market operators offering event contracts should treat this amicus filing as confirmation of aggressive federal preemption enforcement. The CFTC's litigation track record against Arizona, Connecticut, Illinois, and New York, combined with explicit Chairman statements, signals that any state enforcement action against KalshiEx or similar CFTC-regulated exchanges is likely to face immediate federal challenge. Counsel should advise clients on jurisdictional exposure before engaging with state regulators on prediction market offerings.

AI-drafted from the source document, validated against GovPing's analyst note standards . For the primary regulatory language, read the source document .
Published by CFTC on cftc.gov . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

About this source

GovPing monitors CFTC Press Releases for new banking & finance regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 29 changes logged to date.

What changed

The CFTC filed an amicus brief asserting its exclusive jurisdiction over prediction markets under the Commodity Exchange Act, arguing that Congress designed a comprehensive regulatory framework that preempts state laws. This filing escalates ongoing jurisdictional conflicts between federal and state authority over event contract markets.

Prediction market operators and state regulators face direct implications: the CFTC has demonstrated a pattern of preemptive legal action against states attempting to regulate CFTC-regulated exchanges. Operators offering event contracts should assess their regulatory obligations under federal CFTC authority, while states pursuing enforcement actions face potential federal preemption challenges in court.

Archived snapshot

Apr 25, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

Release Number 9219-26

CFTC Reaffirms Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Prediction Markets in Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Filing

April 24, 2026

WASHINGTON — The Commodity Futures Trading Commission today filed an amicus brief in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court confirming the CFTC’s exclusive jurisdiction over the U.S. commodity derivatives markets, including event contract markets commonly referred to as prediction markets. The brief was filed in Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. KalshiEx LLC, No. SJC-13906.

The filing in Massachusetts comes as a part of the CFTC’s broader effort to protect its jurisdiction over prediction markets from an ongoing campaign of state encroachment.

“Some states continue to pursue ever-escalating, illegal enforcement actions against CFTC-regulated exchanges, despite rulings from multiple courts halting those efforts,” said Chairman Michael S. Selig. “Congress has entrusted the CFTC with the sole authority to regulate commodity derivatives markets, including prediction markets. To any state that seeks to nullify federal law and seize authority over these markets, I say again: we will see you in court.”

The amicus brief outlines the history and structure of the Commodity Exchange Act and describes how the comprehensive scheme designed by Congress preempts state laws as applied to CFTC-regulated markets.

The CFTC has previously filed lawsuits against Arizona, Connecticut, Illinois, and New York, securing a temporary restraining order against state regulation of CFTC-regulated prediction markets in Arizona. The CFTC has also filed an amicus brief and argued that state laws are preempted before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

-CFTC-


RELATED LINKS

Get daily alerts for CFTC Press Releases

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from CFTC.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
CFTC
Published
April 24th, 2026
Instrument
Notice
Branch
Executive
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Substantive

Who this affects

Applies to
Exchanges Government agencies Legal professionals
Industry sector
5231 Securities & Investments
Activity scope
Derivatives trading Exchange regulation Federal preemption
Geographic scope
United States US

Taxonomy

Primary area
Securities
Operational domain
Legal
Compliance frameworks
Dodd-Frank
Topics
Financial Services Judicial Administration

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when CFTC Press Releases publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!