CEA Report on Stablecoin Yield Prohibition and Bank Lending Impact
Summary
The White House Council of Economic Advisers (CEA) released a report on April 8, 2026 analyzing the impact of stablecoin yield prohibition on bank lending. The report challenges prior research estimating trillions in impact, concluding that prohibiting stablecoin yield would increase bank lending by only $2.1 billion (0.02 percent) at baseline while imposing a net welfare cost of $800 million. The analysis attributes limited effects to reserve composition, noting only 12 percent of stablecoin reserves held as cash would be locked out of the credit multiplier.
What changed
The CEA report analyzes whether prohibiting stablecoin yield protects bank lending, challenging prior research estimates in the trillions. At baseline calibration, eliminating stablecoin yield would increase bank lending by $2.1 billion (0.02 percent) while imposing a net welfare cost of $800 million. Community banks would see just $500 million in additional lending (0.026 percent increase). The report attributes limited effects to reserve composition: only 12 percent of stablecoin reserves held as cash would be locked out of the credit multiplier, while 88 percent invested in Treasury bills would recirculate through the banking system. Even under worst-case assumptions, the model projects only $531 billion in additional aggregate lending (4.4 percent increase).
Affected parties include stablecoin issuers, banks, and community banks. Stablecoin issuers and intermediaries offering revenue-sharing arrangements should monitor ongoing legislative discussions, as the CLARITY Act variants could expand yield prohibitions. The report's findings may influence regulatory implementation discussions around the GENIUS Act's reserve requirements and yield restrictions.
Archived snapshot
Apr 20, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
April 20, 2026
White House report asserts stablecoin yield ban would have minimal impact on bank lending
On April 8, the Council of Economic Advisers (CEA) released a report analyzing whether prohibiting stablecoin yield protects bank lending. The GENIUS Act, signed into law in July 2025 (covered by InfoBytes here), requires stablecoin issuers to maintain one-to-one reserve backing and prohibits them from paying interest or yield to holders; however, the statutory language does not expressly bar intermediaries from offering yield-like rewards funded by revenue-sharing arrangements with issuers. Some variants of the proposed CLARITY Act would prohibit yield payments through intermediaries.
According to the report, one rationale for prohibiting yield is that if stablecoins were to offer returns, holders may shift dollars out of traditional bank deposits and into stablecoins – potentially impacting banks’ ability to engage in the same volume of fractional lending. CEA’s report challenges prior research estimating the impact of stablecoin yield on bank lending to be in the trillions of dollars, concluding that prohibiting stablecoin yield would have only a minimal impact on bank lending overall. The report contends that, at baseline calibration, eliminating stablecoin yield would increase bank lending by only $2.1 billion, a 0.02 percent gain, while imposing a net welfare cost of $800 million from pushing households into conventional deposits they would not otherwise hold.
Under CEA’s analysis, community banks would see just $500 million in additional lending by prohibiting yield on stablecoins, a 0.026 percent increase. The report attributes these limited effects to reserve composition: according to the model, only the fraction of stablecoin reserves held as cash, approximately 12 percent based on one issuer’s reserve report, would be locked out of the credit multiplier, while the remaining 88 percent invested in Treasury bills would recirculate through the banking system as ordinary deposits. CEA asserted that even under “worst-case assumption[s],” the model would produce only $531 billion in additional aggregate lending, a 4.4 percent increase. The report concludes that concerns about stablecoin yield draining deposits from the banking system are “quantitatively small” and that a yield prohibition “would do very little to protect bank lending, while forgoing the consumer benefits of competitive returns on stablecoin holdings.”
[View source.]
;) ;) Report
Related Posts
- Treasury proposes BSA/AML requirements for stablecoin issuers under GENIUS Act
- FDIC proposes GENIUS Act rule establishing framework for FDIC-supervised payment stablecoin issuers
- Fed’s Barr highlights stablecoin risks and importance of regulatory implementation of GENIUS Act
Latest Posts
- White House report asserts stablecoin yield ban would have minimal impact on bank lending
- OCC submits interim final rule, preemption determination to OMB on Illinois Interchange Fee Prohibition Act’s applicability to national banks See more »
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
Attorney Advertising.
©
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
2026
Written by:
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP Contact + Follow
PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA
- ✔ Increased readership
- ✔ Actionable analytics
- ✔ Ongoing writing guidance Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra
Published In:
Banking Sector + Follow Banks + Follow Community Banks + Follow Cryptoassets + Follow Digital Assets + Follow Financial Regulatory Reform + Follow Financial Services Industry + Follow FinTech + Follow Lenders + Follow Loans + Follow New Legislation + Follow Regulatory Reform + Follow Stablecoins + Follow General Business + Follow Finance & Banking + Follow Securities + Follow more
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on:
Solve with 2Captcha
Solve with 2Captcha
Related changes
Get daily alerts for JD Supra Finance & Banking
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from Orrick.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when JD Supra Finance & Banking publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.