Bank of Israel Report: Fiscal Impulse During War Increased Demand
Summary
The Bank of Israel released a report excerpt analyzing the fiscal impulse during wartime. The report indicates that increased domestic defense consumption led to a significant fiscal impulse, reflecting fiscal policy's positive impact on aggregate demand, though it moderated in 2025 due to tax increases.
What changed
The Bank of Israel has published an excerpt from its forthcoming Annual Report, focusing on the "Fiscal Impulse During the War." The analysis, using the Fiscal Impulse Measure (FIM), found that the sharp increase in domestic defense consumption following the outbreak of the war led to a marked increase in the fiscal impulse, which measures fiscal policy's impact on aggregate demand. This fiscal expansion was notable during crisis periods (COVID-19 and the recent war) and was supported by pre-accumulated fiscal buffers.
While the impulse during the COVID-19 crisis was primarily through transfer payments, the war-related impulse relied on public consumption, mainly defense. The report notes that in 2025, the fiscal impulse moderated due to government-decided tax increases, but remained positive relative to its prewar level. The analysis also discusses how high fiscal impulse, especially during periods of full employment or supply constraints, can lead to price increases or shifts in demand composition, and highlights the unique nature of defense expenditures on reservist mobilization.
Source document (simplified)
- Home Page
- Communication and Publications
- Press Releases
- Excerpt from the forthcoming Bank of Israel Annual Report: The Fiscal Impulse During the War
Press Releases
Excerpt from the forthcoming Bank of Israel Annual Report: The Fiscal Impulse During the War
With the outbreak of the war, the sharp increase in domestic defense consumption led to a marked increase in the fiscal impulse, which reflects the positive impact of fiscal policy on aggregate demand 17/03/2026 Share: To view this press release as a word file, click here
To view this press release as a PDF file, click here
- With the outbreak of the war, the sharp increase in domestic defense consumption led to a marked increase in the fiscal impulse, which reflects the positive impact of fiscal policy on aggregate demand.
- In 2025, the fiscal impulse declined relative to its level at the beginning of the war, mainly due to tax increases decided upon by the government, but it remained positive relative to its prewar level.
The term “fiscal impulse” reflects the direction and intensity of fiscal policy’s impact on aggregate demand. A box in the forthcoming Bank of Israel Annual Report uses the Fiscal Impulse Measure (FIM) of the Brookings Institution (Sheiner et al. 2021), which makes it possible to assess how changes in public consumption, transfer payments, government investments, and taxes impact the change in aggregate demand. The analysis concentrates on the timing of recent crises—COVID-19 and the war that began on October 7—during which the government made fiscal adjustments in accordance with the unique geopolitical and macroeconomic circumstances.
The analysis found that during the years of these crises (2020–2022 and 2023:Q3–2025), there was a high fiscal expansion relative to earlier years. This was made possible partly due to “fiscal buffers” that had accumulated prior to the crises and that provided the government with room to maneuver (IMF, 2026). While the impulse during the COVID-19 crisis was driven mainly through transfer payments and dissipated rapidly once the assistance packages were ended, during the war it relied on public consumption, mainly defense, which has a high multiple but also high volatility. In 2025, the fiscal impulse moderated, mainly due to the activation of adjustment measures on the revenue side, particularly tax increases.
The high fiscal impulse in recent years may help narrow the gap between actual GDP and the GDP trend line, although the intensity of the effect is not certain and depends greatly on the cyclical state of the economy. To the extent that the economy is in full employment or under supply constraints—which is characteristic of the war period—the fiscal impulse may be reflected in a chance in the mix of demand, price increases, or increases in exports.
Moreover, a large part of the fiscal impulse during the war was due to expenditures on reserve mobilization. This component is similar to other government expenditures from the standpoint of creating demand, but differs from them in how demand that is not related to market mechanisms (recruiting employees through wage offers) but rather to a binding order is created. A reservist’s employer is obligated to keep his position, which increases the tendency to marginalize other business activity and to narrow supply in the business sector.
This page was last updated on: 17/03/2026
Named provisions
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Banking & Finance alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when Bank of Israel Press Releases publishes new changes.