Changeflow GovPing Banking & Finance AI in Mortgages: Reshaping the Lending Lifecycle
Routine Notice Added Final

AI in Mortgages: Reshaping the Lending Lifecycle

Favicon for bankingjournal.aba.com ABA Banking Journal Compliance
Detected
Email

Summary

A 2025 Stratmor Group survey found 38% of mortgage lenders used AI and machine learning in 2024, up from 15% in 2023, while 48% deployed robotic process automation. The article outlines six AI applications in mortgage lending including borrower guidance agents, chatbot interfaces, document processing, fraud detection, closing automation, and servicing operations. Experts advise banks to adopt three pillars of responsible AI: risk management, governance framework, and security and compliance, while noting no federal AI-specific regulations currently exist for banks.

Published by ABA on bankingjournal.aba.com . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

About this source

GovPing monitors ABA Banking Journal Compliance for new banking & finance regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 111 changes logged to date.

What changed

The article describes the rapid adoption of AI in mortgage lending, noting that adoption doubled year-over-year and that banks are building internal AI capabilities, with 21% developing their own bots. It identifies six key AI use cases: borrower guidance agents, conversational chatbots, document processing, fraud detection, closing automation, and AI-driven servicing operations.\n\nBanks deploying AI in mortgage lending should focus on three governance pillars: risk management (addressing model bias, inaccurate predictions, operational failures, and reputational harm), governance (ensuring transparency and explainability aligned with regulatory standards), and security and compliance (enforcing data privacy under GLBA, GDPR, CCPA, and fair lending laws). Existing frameworks including SR 11-7 and NIST AI RMF provide guidance, though no federal AI-specific regulations for banks currently exist.

Archived snapshot

Apr 27, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

No Result View All Result

Experts advise bank leaders to ensure AI is deployed responsibly, governed transparently and secured carefully.

April 27, 2026 Reading Time: 5 mins read By Rod J. Alba

The mortgage lending landscape is being fundamentally reshaped. Artificial intelligence no longer is an emerging trend. It is a dominant operational force.

AI technology is rapidly and relentlessly injecting itself into every stage of the mortgage lifecycle, from initial loan origination to servicing. This is not incremental change; the technology is advancing by leaps and bounds, driving a profound and immediate need for awareness and adaptation. At minimum, banks are rigorously evaluating AI tools in testing environments to gauge viability.

The financial markets are seeing the development of AI-powered financial tools that claim to navigate every stage of the residential finance process. The tools range from initial customer interface to loan repayment and everything in between.

And adoption is increasing. According to a 2025 survey by Stratmor Group, a mortgage consulting firm, 38% of mortgage lenders in 2024 reported using artificial intelligence and machine learning, up from 15% in 2023. The survey also noted that 48% of lenders used robotic process automation, or “bots,” in the past year to streamline processes such as ordering appraisals and credit scores — up from 30% in 2020.

“Mortgage lenders are increasingly investing in automation and AI as foundational technologies to improve efficiency and productivity,” says Nicole Yung, a senior partner at Stratmor Group. “This represents a fundamental transformation in how mortgage operations are being conducted.”

Yung also says that increased investment in AI includes a “growing trend” of lenders building internal capabilities to “develop and maintain their own bots,” with 21% of lenders reporting that they are developing internal AI capabilities.

“Lenders are strategically prioritizing front-end digital capabilities that directly impact the application process,” she notes. “The industry is at a critical juncture where investments in technology foundations will determine which organizations thrive in the increasingly digital mortgage landscape.”

Some examples of the services and capabilities AI has provided, include:

  • AI agents created to guide borrowers through the mortgage application process, automatically extracting and populating data (e.g., income, employment, credit) into forms like the Uniform Residential Loan Application.
  • AI programs simulating and processing human conversation, either written or verbal, allowing consumers to interact with digital representatives, often called “chatbots,” as if they were communicating with a real person.
  • Mortgage document processing technologies that can be used to handle paperwork such as bank statements, tax forms, income verifications and other documents that need to be considered, summarized and retained in the mortgage approval process.
  • AI solutions that can detect fraud and financial crimes by analyzing large datasets for anomalies, verifying document authenticity and identifying suspicious patterns in borrower and transaction behavior in real time.
  • AI tools at the mortgage settlement table that are automating closing package reviews, fee reconciliation and compliance checks, and often cutting processing times significantly.
  • Mortgage servicing operations automated by AI functions that handle customer interactions, predict delinquencies and manage payment plans through intelligent agents that provide real-time support and personalized outreach. As AI capabilities advance, mortgage banking executives are increasingly concerned about whether they are moving fast enough to align with the accelerating AI revolution, and many fear that delays could leave them at a competitive disadvantage. These concerns are well founded, but the real compass that should guide bank leaders is that while it is true that the AI revolution is already underway, its transformative impact is only beginning — we are only starting to understand the contours of an AI future where real estate lending operations will evolve in diverse ways.

Commencing the AI “voyage” is the single most important action a mortgage lender can take right now. As Gabe Minton, EVP and chief information officer at Mortgage Connect, advises in a recent American Bankers Association webinar, AI’s power is not magic — it is a deeply potent, results-driven tool that must be integrated into your operations. The goal is momentum, not perfection. Managers must reject the notion of an “all-or-nothing” commitment. The immediate focus should be on exploring targeted AI solutions, identifying specific applications and strategically weaving the technology into the fabric of the bank’s systems.

As banks begin this journey, leadership must focus on what many experts have coined as the “three pillars” of responsible AI adoption: risk management, governance framework and security and compliance. In terms of risk management, executives must remember that AI technology introduces new risks into banking operations; these risks include model bias, inaccurate predictions, operational failures and reputational harm. The governance pillar refers to AI decisions being transparent, explainable and aligned with regulatory and ethical standards. In addition, there must be clearly defined roles and responsibilities for AI oversight across business, compliance and technology teams. The third pillar is security and compliance, which recognizes that AI systems must handle sensitive borrower data, making cybersecurity and regulatory compliance critical and requiring enforcement of data privacy protocols (the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act in the U.S., the E.U.’s General Data Protection Regulation, the California Consumer Privacy Act and U.S. fair lending laws).

The importance of these three pillars is perhaps best explained by describing their interaction. When taken together, they create a hard shell of trust: governance sets the rules and apportions roles, security enforces them, and risk management monitors outcomes — ensuring AI adoption is responsible, resilient and effective.

In addition, banks should understand that there currently are no federal AI-specific regulations for banks. However, transactions assisted by AI are subject to existing consumer protection laws such as the Truth in Lending Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act and frameworks like SR 11-7 and the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s AI Risk Management Framework to evaluate AI use. SR 11-7 is a foundational supervisory guidance on model risk management issued jointly by the Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency in April 2011 (the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation later adopted it in 2017).

While written 15 years ago, SR 11-7 remains the primary framework used to examine AI and machine learning in banking. Regulators use their principles to ensure that “black box” algorithms are transparent, fair and free from bias. Likewise, NIST’s AI Risk RMF is a voluntary, customizable non-sector-specific guide developed to help organizations manage risks associated with AI. Released in early 2023, it is considered a “gold standard” for trustworthy AI governance because it provides a flexible, structured way to identify and mitigate AI risks across the entire system lifecycle, from initial design to decommissioning. It includes a generative AI profile as a companion document.

“AI adoption in mortgage lending is inevitable; unmanaged AI risk is not,” observed Eric Lapin, managing partner at Finfusion Consulting. “As AI reshapes the entire mortgage lifecycle, leadership must ensure it is deployed responsibly. It must be governed transparently, secured rigorously and managed with the same discipline we apply to credit, capital and consumer protection.”

Rod Alba is ABA’s SVP for real estate finance.

ABA can assist banks as they employ this quickly evolving banking technology. Visit www.aba.com/AI, which features links to a variety of resources such as the model risk management guidance and NIST AI RMF mentioned in the article, in addition to news, advocacy materials and more.

Tags: Artificial intelligence Lending Mortgage Share Tweet Pin

Related Posts

Mortgage rates decline

Economy April 23, 2026 The rate for a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage was 6.23% this week. The rate for a 15-year fixed-rate mortgage was 5.58%.

Bringing financial literacy to life for the next generation

Financial Education April 23, 2026 When young people are empowered to teach and create, financial literacy becomes more relatable, engaging and memorable.'

HUD, FHFA roll out plans for new credit scoring in mortgages

Mortgage April 22, 2026 HUD will adopt FICO 10T and VantageScore 4.0 for FHA loans. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will begin using VantageScore 4.0 immediately and the future use of FICO Score 10T credit scores for loans delivered to Fannie Mae.

Podcast: ABA’s ecosystem strategy to tackle fraud

ABA Banking Journal Podcast April 22, 2026 On the latest episode of the ABA Banking Journal Podcast and ABA Fraudcast, Rob Nichols and Paul Benda provide several updates on the association's work to reduce the incidence and cost of fraud for bank customers.

CFPB finalizes rule to revise fair lending enforcement

Compliance and Risk April 21, 2026 The CFPB will issue a final rule to remove disparate impact from enforcement of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, clarify the prohibition on discouraging prospective applicants, and establish new limits on special-purpose credit programs offered by lenders.

Banking groups seek more time for public input on Genius Act implementation

Compliance and Risk April 21, 2026 ABA joined three banking sector associations in requesting that the Treasury Department and FDIC tie the public comment period for three proposed rules to implement the Genius Act to the issuance of a final rule on the matter...

NEWSBYTES

OCC issues two interim final actions related to IFPA preemption

April 26, 2026

Treasury hosts community bank leaders for financial literacy roundtable

April 24, 2026

Nacha reports growth in same-day ACH payments

April 24, 2026

SPONSORED CONTENT

Why Your Systems Keep Slowing Down — and What to Do About It

April 21, 2026

How leading banks are enhancing customer engagement through financial data insights

April 10, 2026

Check Fraud Is Outpacing Legacy Controls. What Banks Should Evaluate Now.

April 1, 2026

How top agricultural lenders are approaching AI, automation and innovation in 2026

March 2, 2026

PODCASTS

Podcast: ABA’s ecosystem strategy to tackle fraud

April 22, 2026

Podcast: Capitalizing on opportunities to serve high-net-worth clients

April 9, 2026

Podcast: Are credit union commercial loans risky business?

March 30, 2026
American Bankers Association
1333 New Hampshire Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-BANKERS (800-226-5377)
www.aba.com
About ABA
Privacy Policy
Contact ABA

ABA Banking Journal
About ABA Banking Journal
Media Kit
Advertising
Subscribe

© 2026 American Bankers Association. All rights reserved.

No Result View All Result

Get daily alerts for ABA Banking Journal Compliance

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from ABA.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
ABA
Instrument
Notice
Branch
Executive
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor

Who this affects

Applies to
Banks Financial advisers
Industry sector
5221 Commercial Banking
Activity scope
AI adoption Mortgage lending Fraud detection
Geographic scope
United States US

Taxonomy

Primary area
Artificial Intelligence
Operational domain
Compliance
Topics
Consumer Finance Cybersecurity

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when ABA Banking Journal Compliance publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!