USDA Removes Horse Import Pre-Export Examination Requirement

Legal Status This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.

The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to About the Federal Register on NARA's archives.gov.

The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.

Legal Status

Rule

You may be interested in this older document that published on 06/20/2025 with action 'Proposed rule.' View Document

Import Regulations for Horses; Pre-Export Examination

A Rule by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service on 04/10/2026

• 1.

1.

• Document Details Published Content - Document Details Agencies Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Agency/Docket Number Docket No. APHIS-2025-0018 CFR 9 CFR 93 Document Citation 91 FR 18277 Document Number 2026-06955 Document Type Rule Pages 18277-18279
  (3 pages) Publication Date 04/10/2026 RIN 0579-AE88 Published Content - Document Details

• PDF Official Content

  • View printed version (PDF) Official Content

• Document Details Published Content - Document Details Agencies Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Agency/Docket Number Docket No. APHIS-2025-0018 CFR 9 CFR 93 Document Citation 91 FR 18277 Document Number 2026-06955 Document Type Rule Pages 18277-18279
  (3 pages) Publication Date 04/10/2026 RIN 0579-AE88 Published Content - Document Details

• Document Dates Published Content - Document Dates Effective Date 2026-05-11 Dates Text Effective May 11, 2026. Published Content - Document Dates

• Table of Contents Enhanced Content - Table of Contents This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
  headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
  This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
  has no substantive legal effect.

  • AGENCY:
  • ACTION:
  • SUMMARY:
  • DATES:
  • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
  • SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
  • Background
  • Executive Order 12866, Executive Order 14192, and Regulatory Flexibility Act
  • Executive Order 12988
  • Congressional Review Act
  • Paperwork Reduction Act
  • List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 93
  • PART 93—IMPORTATION OF CERTAIN ANIMALS, BIRDS, FISH, AND POULTRY, AND CERTAIN ANIMAL, BIRD, AND POULTRY PRODUCTS; REQUIREMENTS FOR MEANS OF CONVEYANCE AND SHIPPING CONTAINERS
  • Footnotes Enhanced Content - Table of Contents

• Related Documents Enhanced Content - Related Documents FederalRegister.gov uses the agency dockets published with the document to display related documents.

| Docket No. APHIS-2025-0018
(2 Documents) | | | |
| --- | | | |
| Date | | Action | Title |
| | 2026-04-10 | Final rule. | Import Regulations for Horses; Pre-Export Examination |
| | 2025-06-20 | Proposed rule. | Import Regulations for Horses; Pre-Export Examination |

Enhanced Content - Related Documents

• Public Comments Enhanced Content - Public Comments This feature is not available for this document.

Enhanced Content - Public Comments
- Regulations.gov Data Enhanced Content - Regulations.gov Data Additional information is not currently available for this document.

Enhanced Content - Regulations.gov Data

- Sharing Enhanced Content - Sharing Shorter Document URL https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2026-06955 Email Email this document to a friend Enhanced Content - Sharing

• Print Enhanced Content - Print
  • Print this document Enhanced Content - Print
• Other Formats Enhanced Content - Other Formats This document is also available in the following formats:

JSON Normalized attributes and metadata XML Original full text XML MODS Government Publishing Office metadata More information and documentation can be found in our developer tools pages.

Enhanced Content - Other Formats
- Public Inspection Public Inspection This PDF is FR Doc. 2026-06955 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
04/09/2026 at 8:45 am.

It was viewed
27
times while on Public Inspection.

If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507. Learn more here.

Public Inspection
Published Document: 2026-06955 (91 FR 18277) This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Document Headings Document headings vary by document type but may contain
the following:

1. the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
2. the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to
3. the agency docket number / agency internal file number
4. the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details.

Department of Agriculture

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

1. 9 CFR Part 93
2. [Docket No. APHIS-2025-0018]
3. RIN 0579-AE88

AGENCY:

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION:

Final rule.

SUMMARY:

We are removing the requirement that horses offered for importation to the United States be accompanied by documentation of pre-export examination occurring within 48 hours of departure from the port of embarkation endorsed by a salaried veterinary medical officer. We have found that logistical barriers prevent affected parties from meeting this requirement at this time. This action removes the requirement, while keeping in place other requirements of the regulations.

DATES:

Effective May 11, 2026.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Benjamin Kaczmarski, USDA-APHIS ( printed page 18278) Regulatory Officer, 5601 Sunnyside Ave., #AP760, Beltsville, MD 20705; (240) 636-2149.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

The regulations in 9 CFR part 93 (referred to below as the regulations) prohibit or restrict the importation of certain animals, including horses, to protect U.S. livestock from communicable diseases.

On September 14, 2023, we published in the Federal Register a final rule 1 amending the horse import regulations to better align them with international standards and improve flexibility for both the equine industry and the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). One of the changes we made in that final rule was to require, in §  93.314(a)(5), that horses offered for importation to the United States be accompanied by documentation of pre-export examination occurring within 48 hours of departure from the port of embarkation endorsed by a salaried veterinary medical officer. Since the publication of that final rule, APHIS has found that logistical barriers may prevent affected parties from meeting this requirement as stated.

Accordingly, on June 20, 2025, we published in the Federal Register (90 FR 26224-26225, Docket No. APHIS-2025-0018) a proposed rule [2 ] to remove the requirement that horses offered for importation to the United States be accompanied by documentation of pre-export examination occurring within 48 hours of departure from the port of embarkation endorsed by a salaried veterinary medical officer. We solicited comments concerning our proposal for 60 days, ending August 19, 2025. We received 12 comments by that date. They were from industry associations, businesses, and private individuals.

The majority of comments supported our proposal, reiterating and elaborating on the concerns we described in the proposed rule. We agree with these commenters that the requirement as written is overly prescriptive and understand that obtaining a pre-export examination within 48 hours of departure from the port of embarkation, particularly with endorsement by a salaried veterinary medical officer of the exporting country, may be logistically challenging.

One commenter disagreed, stating that the pre-examination of horses better protects animals and prevents biological infestation and disease from entering the United States. Another commenter stated that health checks prevent disease spread.

As we explained in the proposed rule, we intended the requirement for a pre-export inspection to serve as one of multiple measures to specifically address the issue of sick and injured horses arriving at a United States port of entry. Only horses found free of communicable disease or exposure thereto at the mandatory port of entry inspection are allowed entry into the United States (§ 93.306). Horses are quarantined at the port of entry until negative results to port of entry tests are obtained and the horses are certified by the port veterinarian to be free from clinical evidence of disease (§ 93.308(a)). While APHIS strives to prevent the arrival of sick horses at the port of entry, the port-of-entry inspection and quarantine protocols that currently exist, and that this rule does not change, mitigate the risk of communicable disease entering the United States, even if a horse exhibiting signs of communicable disease does arrive at the port of entry. We believe the above restrictions, which this rule does not change, address the two commenters' concerns about disease risk.

We also note that additional measures exist in the regulations to reduce the possibility of sick horses arriving at the port of entry. These measures include a mandatory inspection on the premises of origin that certifies the horses are free of evidence of communicable disease and exposure to disease during the 60 days preceding exportation (§ 93.314(a)), as well as case-specific inspections that the Administrator may perform pursuant to § 93.304 and §  93.301(a).

Additionally, as noted in the proposed rule, we strengthened the regulations to address the issue of sick or injured horses arriving at the port of entry in multiple ways, not only by requiring an additional pre-export inspection. For example, we clarified the health certificate requirements in §  93.314 to help us confirm the legitimacy of health certificates, and added additional requirements to help decrease disease risk, such as requiring that a horse not be gelded shortly before importation. We also added shipping container requirements in §  93.302, including measures to ensure that horses are transported safely. These provisions, as well as all other requirements related to the importation of horses into the United States, will remain in place and unchanged by this rule.

Finally, we note that several commenters stated that horses that were healthy upon embarkation to the United States could become sick or injured during transit for a multitude of reasons, including stall construction, stall density, ventilation, ambient temperature and humidity, water and feed intake, travel duration, and itinerary, and that the arrival of sick or injured horses at ports of arrival could be indicative of stresses during transit rather than a regulatory failure in the shipping country. We agree with these commenters that this is a plausible explanation for the arrival of sick or injured horses at ports of entry into the United States.

One commenter stated that the regulations should be updated to differentiate export, import, and business activities.

We are unsure what specific changes the commenter is suggesting. However, activities other than the pre-export examination of equines are outside the scope of this rulemaking.

One commenter asked us to clarify that certificates issued within seven days of departure remain valid if no health changes occur and to allow APHIS-recognized private veterinarians to conduct inspections.

This is outside the scope of this rulemaking.

One commenter asked us to include documentation addressing the potential greenhouse gas impacts of this rule, as changes to procedural timing or port of entry options may shift emissions profiles of aircraft used to transport horses, and adjustments to pre-export examination requirements may require investments in new facilities or expanded operations abroad.

Meanwhile, another commenter pointed out that this rule could alleviate delays caused by staffing limitations and restricted operations, resulting in a more streamlined transportation process. We are not changing port of entry options, and we are merely removing the requirement for an additional inspection. Thus, this rule would not create a need for new facilities or expanded operations, or have any direct effect on travel duration that would increase greenhouse gas emissions.

At the time the proposed rule was issued, we determined that this action was categorically excluded from the requirement to prepare an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement under the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4231 et seq.) and Agency ( printed page 18279) implementing regulations as written at that time. Based on the comments received, we have no reason to believe this categorical exclusion was in error.

Therefore, for the reasons given in the proposed rule and in this document, we are adopting the proposed rule as a final rule, without change.

Executive Order 12866, Executive Order 14192, and Regulatory Flexibility Act

This rule does not meet the criteria of a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866, as amended by Executive Orders 14215 and 13563. Therefore, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has not reviewed this rule under those orders. This regulation is also not a “regulatory action,” as the meaning of that term is set forth in Executive Order 14192 and implementing guidance.

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612) (as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) of 1996; 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), agencies must prepare and make available for public comment a regulatory flexibility analysis that describes the effect of the rule on small entities (i.e., small businesses, small organizations, and small government jurisdictions). No regulatory flexibility analysis is required, however, if the head of an agency or an appropriate designee certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. APHIS has concluded and hereby certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities; therefore, an analysis is not included. This recission rule will only have minor and beneficial impacts on small entities engaged in the importation of equines by removing a requirement that has proven logistically difficult to implement consistently. This recission rule will have a beneficial effect on these small entities, lowering costs related to paperwork and otherwise improving regulatory compliance with the remaining provisions of the regulations.

Executive Order 12988

This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This rule: (1) Preempts all State and local laws and regulations that are inconsistent with this rule; (2) has no retroactive effect; and (3) does not require administrative proceedings before parties may file suit in court challenging this rule.

Congressional Review Act

Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs designated this rule as not a major rule, as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

Paperwork Reduction Act

This final rule contains no new reporting or recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Further, this rule will reduce the reporting and recordkeeping requirements in 9 CFR 93.314.

List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 93

• Animal diseases
• Imports
• Livestock
• Poultry and poultry products
• Reporting and recordkeeping requirements Accordingly, we are amending 9 CFR part 93, subpart C, as follows:

PART 93—IMPORTATION OF CERTAIN ANIMALS, BIRDS, FISH, AND POULTRY, AND CERTAIN ANIMAL, BIRD, AND POULTRY PRODUCTS; REQUIREMENTS FOR MEANS OF CONVEYANCE AND SHIPPING CONTAINERS

1. The authority citation for part 93 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1622 and 8301-8317; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.4.

§ 93.314 [Amended] 2. Amend § 93.314 by removing paragraph (a)(5), and redesignating paragraphs (a)(6) and (a)(7) as paragraphs (a)(5) and (a)(6), respectively.

Done in Washington, DC, this 31st day of March 2026.

Kelly Moore,

Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.

Footnotes

1.

                     To view the proposed rule, final rule, supporting documents, and public comments, go to: *[https://www.regulations.gov/​document/​APHIS-2016-0033-0031](https://www.regulations.gov/document/APHIS-2016-0033-0031).*

Back to Citation 2.

                     To view the proposed rule and public comments, go to: *[https://www.regulations.gov/​document/​APHIS-2025-0018-0001](https://www.regulations.gov/document/APHIS-2025-0018-0001).*

Back to Citation [FR Doc. 2026-06955 Filed 4-9-26; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-34-P

Published Document: 2026-06955 (91 FR 18277)