Changeflow GovPing N.D. California

Recent changes

Thursday, February 26, 2026

Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Vaughan v. Federal National Mortgage Association - Contract Dispute

This filing concerns the case Vaughan et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al, Case Number 4:25-cv-00479-ASK. Recent filings include oppositions to motions to dismiss the second amended complaint and a motion for an extension of time to file a response.

Routine Enforcement Corporate Governance
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Amit Khanna Case - Notice of Administrative Motion Error

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has received a notice regarding case 3:25-cv-06977-VC. Amit Khanna filed a notice stating that a third administrative motion for a 48-hour extension was filed in error and requested it be stricken.

Routine Notice Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Means v. Lyft, Inc. - Pro Hac Vice Motion Granted

In the case of Means v. Lyft, Inc., the court has granted a motion for Pro Hac Vice appearance. This order allows an out-of-state attorney to practice in a specific case before the court. The case is part of a Multi-District Litigation.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

S.T. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) - Civil Case Filing

A civil case, Case Number 3:26-cv-01649, was filed against the United States of America, specifically the Federal Bureau of Prisons, on February 25, 2026. The filing includes a complaint, proposed summons, and a consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge.

Routine Enforcement Government Contracting
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

H.M. v. US Bureau of Prisons - Civil Case

A new civil case, H.M. v. US Bureau of Prisons, was filed on February 25, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a complaint against the Federal Bureau of Prisons and other defendants, with a filing fee of $405.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

A.L. v. United States - Civil Complaint

A civil case, A.L. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons), was filed on February 25, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint alleges unspecified claims against the U.S. government, with a filing fee of $405.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Foster v. United Parcel Service - Civil Rights Jobs Case

A civil rights jobs case titled Foster v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al. was filed on February 25, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a Notice of Removal from a state court action, with United Parcel Service, Inc. as the filing party.

Priority review Enforcement Employment & Labor
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Ramos v. Truist Bank - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Ramos v. Truist Bank, was filed on February 25, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The filing includes a complaint, a consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge, and an ex parte application for a Temporary Restraining Order.

Priority review Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Roe CL 283 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. - Personal Injury Product Liability

A new civil case, Roe CL 283 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al., was filed on February 25, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves claims of personal injury and product liability. The filing includes a complaint and proposed summons.

Priority review Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Cooper v. State of California - Civil Rights Case

A new civil rights case, Cooper v. State of California, was filed on February 25, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint names the State of California, the City and County of San Francisco, and various law enforcement officials as defendants. The case is based on a federal question.

Routine Enforcement Civil Rights

Showing 1091–1100 of 1,215 changes

1 108 109 110 111 112 122
RSS

Get daily alerts

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Filters

2 official sources tracked

NDCA Recently Filed Documents

Updated 1d ago

NDCA Recently Filed Cases

Updated 1h ago

Get N.D. California alerts

Daily digest of N.D. California regulatory changes. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.