4TH-CIRCUIT

Paul Schultz Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals denied Paul Schultz's petition for a writ of mandamus. The court found that mandamus relief was not appropriate as a substitute for appeal and that Schultz had not demonstrated a clear right to the relief sought. The petition and a motion for a stay were denied.

Paul Schultz's Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals denied Paul Schultz's petition for a writ of mandamus. The court found that mandamus relief is not appropriate as a substitute for appeal and that Schultz did not demonstrate a clear right to the relief sought. The petition and a related stay motion were denied.

Lowy v. Daniel Defense, LLC - Product Liability Opinion

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed in part and vacated in part a district court's decision in Karen Lowy v. Daniel Defense, LLC. The opinion, decided on February 11, 2026, addresses product liability claims against firearms manufacturers and related entities. The case has been remanded for further proceedings.

Gibbons v. Gibbs - Affirmation of District Court Decision

The Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's decision in Gibbons v. Gibbs, upholding the dismissal of claims related to the appointment of an election registrar. The court found that the appellant forfeited appellate review by failing to properly proffer evidence and found no abuse of discretion in the district court's evidentiary rulings or jury selection.

Michael Herlihy v. DBMP, LLC - Asbestos Claims in Bankruptcy

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a bankruptcy court's decision to deny a motion to lift an automatic stay for asbestos claims against DBMP, LLC. The court found that lifting the stay would prejudice the debtor's estate and interfere with a potential Chapter 11 reorganization plan for asbestos claimants.

Cusick v. DOJ - Affirmation of District Court Dismissal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision dismissing a lawsuit challenging federal firearm prohibitions under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and § 922(g)(4). The court found the challenge to § 922(g)(1) foreclosed by precedent, and other claims were dismissed based on the initial ruling.

Pendarvis v. Wilson - Constitutional Rights Case

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated and remanded the case of Pendarvis v. Wilson. The court found that the plaintiff's operative complaint failed to adequately plead Article III standing, impacting a hemp farmer's lawsuit against over 30 South Carolina government officials.