OFAC and BIS Guidance on Cuba Oil Exports

JD Supra Trade Law

Published March 12th, 2026

Detected March 13th, 2026

Summary

The U.S. OFAC and BIS have issued new guidance on oil-related transactions involving Cuba. OFAC announced a favorable licensing policy for specific resales of Venezuelan oil to Cuba, while BIS clarified the use of License Exception SCP for U.S.-origin petroleum exports. The guidance aims to support the Cuban people and private sector while restricting dealings with government entities.

View original document View source feed page

What changed

OFAC and BIS have jointly issued new guidance concerning oil transactions involving Cuba. OFAC has introduced a favorable licensing policy for specific resales of Venezuelan oil to Cuba, aiming to support the Cuban people and private sector, while explicitly excluding transactions involving Cuban military, intelligence, or senior government officials. Concurrently, BIS has provided interpretive guidance clarifying that License Exception Support for the Cuban People (SCP) may authorize certain exports and reexports of petroleum products to eligible private-sector or personal end users in Cuba, without requiring separate OFAC authorization if all SCP criteria are met.

Exporters and intermediaries involved in oil transactions with Cuba must carefully review this new guidance to ensure compliance. Key actions include assessing whether transactions qualify for OFAC's favorable licensing policy or BIS's License Exception SCP, and ensuring that all end-users and ultimate destinations meet the specified criteria for supporting the Cuban populace and private sector, rather than prohibited government entities. Failure to comply could result in sanctions violations.

What to do next

Review OFAC's favorable licensing policy for Venezuelan oil resales to Cuba.
Assess eligibility for BIS License Exception SCP for U.S.-origin petroleum exports to Cuba.
Ensure all oil transactions and end-users comply with the new guidance's restrictions on government entities.

Source document (simplified)

March 12, 2026

U.S. Issues New OFAC and BIS Guidance on Cuba: What Exporters Need to Know

Mike Volkov The Volkov Law Group + Follow Contact LinkedIn Facebook X Send Embed

The U.S. government has issued significant new guidance clarifying how sanctions and export controls apply to certain oil-related transactions involving Cuba. In coordinated actions, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced a new “favorable licensing policy” for specific resales of Venezuelan oil to Cuba, while the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) issued interpretive guidance regarding the availability of license exceptions under the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) for U.S.-origin petroleum exports.

Taken together, the announcements reflect a calibrated policy shift: limited flexibility for transactions that support the Cuban people and private sector, coupled with firm restrictions on dealings that benefit Cuban government, military, or intelligence entities.

OFAC’s Favorable Licensing Policy for Venezuelan Oil Resales

OFAC’s announcement focuses on transactions involving Venezuelan-origin oil that may ultimately be resold for use in Cuba. Historically, overlapping Venezuela and Cuba sanctions frameworks created substantial compliance uncertainty. OFAC’s new position signals that it will look more favorably on specific license applications for transactions that support the Cuban people, including commercial and humanitarian uses.

Importantly, OFAC clarified that applicants do not necessarily need to have an established U.S. entity to qualify under this licensing approach. Moreover, certain Cuba-related prohibitions embedded in Venezuela General License 46A — particularly restrictions on transactions involving persons located in Cuba — will not automatically disqualify otherwise eligible transactions under the new policy.

However, the guardrails are explicit. The favorable licensing policy does not apply to transactions involving Cuban military entities, intelligence services, senior government officials, or any entities appearing on the U.S. State Department’s Cuba Restricted List. The policy is framed squarely around support for Cuba’s private sector and civilian population.

This distinction is critical. OFAC is attempting to thread a needle — permitting narrowly tailored energy flows that benefit civilians, while maintaining pressure on state-controlled structures.

BIS Clarifies Use of License Exception SCP

Separately, BIS issued guidance responding to questions from exporters regarding oil and petroleum shipments to Cuba. BIS emphasized that License Exception Support for the Cuban People (SCP), found in Section 740.21 of the EAR, may authorize certain exports and reexports of petroleum products when destined for eligible private-sector or personal end users in Cuba.

Under License Exception SCP, exports that improve living conditions, support independent economic activity, or facilitate humanitarian work may proceed without a specific BIS license, provided all eligibility criteria are met.

BIS also clarified an important procedural point: exporters do not need separate OFAC authorization when a BIS license exception applies to oil exports to Cuba. In other words, if a shipment qualifies under SCP, no additional OFAC approval is required — assuming no prohibited parties are involved.

The guidance further notes that petroleum products need not be exported directly to the final end user, but they must ultimately be destined for eligible private-sector users or for personal use by individuals and their families. This creates practical flexibility for distributors and intermediaries, while preserving compliance obligations regarding ultimate destination and end use.

Compliance Risks Remain Significant

Despite the more flexible tone, the compliance landscape remains complex and risk-intensive.

First, exporters must conduct robust end-user and end-use due diligence. The prohibition on transactions involving Cuban government entities, defense ministries, or affiliated organizations remains absolute. Screening against the Cuba Restricted List and other sanctions lists is essential.

Second, companies must carefully document eligibility under License Exception SCP. BIS has indicated that it may return license applications without action if the transaction qualifies for SCP — placing the burden squarely on exporters to correctly interpret and apply the exception.

Third, transactions involving Venezuelan-origin oil add another layer of sanctions analysis, requiring careful alignment with OFAC’s Venezuela-related authorizations.

Strategic Implications for Energy and Trade Compliance Teams

These developments suggest that U.S. regulators are willing to permit narrowly structured energy transactions that support Cuban civilians and private enterprise. At the same time, enforcement risk remains high for transactions that inadvertently benefit restricted entities.

For compliance professionals, the practical implications include:

Integrating OFAC and EAR analysis into early transaction planning
Conducting enhanced due diligence on Cuban counterparties and intermediaries
Maintaining documentation supporting eligibility under License Exception SCP
Carefully structuring contracts to ensure compliance with end-use limitations
Monitoring evolving policy signals in both Cuba and Venezuela sanctions frameworks

Conclusion

The latest OFAC and BIS guidance does not represent a wholesale relaxation of Cuba sanctions. Rather, it reflects a targeted effort to allow humanitarian and private-sector oriented energy flows while maintaining longstanding prohibitions on dealings with Cuban government institutions.

For exporters willing to navigate the regulatory details carefully, the guidance provides a pathway for compliant engagement. But the margin for error remains narrow. As with all Cuba-related transactions, disciplined compliance controls, precise documentation, and ongoing monitoring are essential.

Send Print Report

Latest Posts

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
Attorney Advertising.

Written by:

The Volkov Law Group Contact + Follow Mike Volkov + Follow more less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA

✔ Increased readership
✔ Actionable analytics
✔ Ongoing writing guidance Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra

Start Publishing »

Published In:

Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) + Follow Compliance Monitoring + Follow Cuba + Follow Due Diligence + Follow Economic Sanctions + Follow Export Administration Regulations (EAR) + Follow Export Controls + Follow Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) + Follow Oil & Gas + Follow Regulatory Requirements + Follow Risk Management + Follow Sanctions + Follow U.S. Treasury + Follow US Trade Policies + Follow Venezuela + Follow General Business + Follow Energy & Utilities + Follow International Trade + Follow more less

The Volkov Law Group on:

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Sign Up Log in ** By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.* - hide - hide