March 10, 2026

Italian SMEs Bill Expands Structuring Options for Inventory Financing Securitizations

Marco Frattini, Fabio Maria Guidi, Giuseppina Pagano, Francesco Squerzoni, Vinicio Trombetti Jones Day + Follow Contact LinkedIn Facebook X Send Embed

In Short

The Situation: The Italian legal framework—including the Italian securitization law No. 130 of 30 April 1999 (the "Law 130")—already permits inventory financing transactions, but few deals have been executed so far due to limited structuring options and the restriction to Italian originators.

The Result: On 4 March 2026, the Italian Senate approved the annual SMEs Bill (the "SMEs Bill"), introducing broad amendments to the Law 130 that provide additional options for inventory financing transactions by expanding segregation mechanisms within securitization structures.

Looking Ahead: The reform allows structures with foreign originators and multijurisdiction asset pools, broadening the use of Italian securitizations in international inventory financing, while reinforcing Italy's leading position in the international ABS market through additional structural options that enhance the Law 130's flexibility and its growing use as a lending tool.

Pre-Reform Legal Framework

Before the SMEs Bill, inventory financing securitizations were already possible under Italian law, typically structured either through: (i) a nonpossessory pledge (pegno non possessorio) over inventory securing a direct loan granted by an Italian securitization vehicle (a "130 SPV") pursuant to Article 1, paragraph 1 -ter of the Law 130; or (ii) a segregated estate (patrimonio destinato) established under the Milleproroghe Decree as collateral for a limited recourse loan granted under Article 7, paragraph 1, letter (a) of the Law 130 ("Article 7(1)(a)").

However, these structures were limited in scope and available only to Italian originators, preventing cross-border transactions.

The SMEs Bill introduces targeted amendments to the Law 130, enhancing the flexibility and international applicability of inventory financing securitizations.

Key Legislative Changes

Securitizations with Limited Recourse Loans (Article 7 of the Law 130). Article 7(1)(a) already allows 130 SPVs to grant limited recourse loans backed only by the cash flows or proceeds of the underlying assets (the "Limited Recourse Loans"). Such structures are substantially equivalent to an outright assignment of receivables, since the repayment of the Limited Recourse Loan depends exclusively on the performance of the underlying financed receivables.

In this context, the SMEs Bill introduces three key enhancements:

• Future receivables (Article 7(1)(a)): Although already implied in Article 7(1)(a) and the other provisions of the Law 130, it is now explicitly clarified that Limited Recourse Loans can also be granted against "future receivables" arising from the sale of physical completed products already produced by the originator and ready for sale to its clients (the "Completed Products");
• Segregation of Raw Materials (Article 7, paragraph 2 -octies of the Law 130): The reform introduces the possibility, in securitizations with Limited Recourse Loans, to segregate not only Completed Products but also raw materials still in production that will become Completed Products by the end of the production process (the "Raw Materials"). This is significant because it allows originators to segregate these Raw Materials for the benefit of the 130 SPV (and ultimately the securitization's investors) without waiting for them to become Completed Products, thereby accelerating access to financing; and
• Segregation through transfer to an AssetCo (Article 7, paragraph 2 -octies of the Law 130): The reform introduces an additional method for segregating Raw Materials and/or Completed Products for the benefit of the 130 SPV (and ultimately the securitization's investors) through transfer to a dedicated company (the "AssetCo"). While segregation was already possible via a nonpossessory pledge or a segregated estate, the new option allows the Raw Materials/Completed Products, along with the underlying receivables, to be transferred to the AssetCo, which is subject to the same legal, segregation, and tax framework as ReoCos and LeaseCos in distressed/NPLs securitizations, offering a segregation and tax regime that is investor-friendly. Securitizations of material assets (Article 7.2 of the Law 130). The SMEs Bill has expanded the scope of Article 7.2 of the Law 130, which previously allowed true-sale securitizations only of real-estate assets or registered movable assets (e.g., vehicles, ships). The amendments now permit securitizations of any movable material assets, even if not registered, enabling the use of Article 7.2 structures in inventory financing transactions as well.

Entry into Force of the SMEs Bill

The SMEs Bill has already been approved by the Italian Senate. For it to enter into force, it must be published in the Official Gazette, after which the applicable vacatio legis period will need to elapse before the amendments become effective.

Four Key Takeaways

1. Enhanced financing flexibility and cross-border capabilities: The reform provides additional options for Italian originators and, for the first time, allows foreign originators to use their inventory as collateral, broadening funding sources beyond traditional bank lending, improving credit efficiency, potentially securing more favorable pricing, and enabling multijurisdictional structures.
2. Expanded investor universe: Using securitizations for inventory financing opens access to a wider range of investors, including those not licensed to lend in Italy, thereby increasing market depth and liquidity.
3. Advanced and internationally competitive Italian securitization framework: The scope of Law 130 continues to expand and innovate, reinforcing Italy's leadership in the international ABS market, with market participants benefiting from greater structural flexibility for sophisticated and cross-border financing solutions.
4. Preliminary case-by-case regulatory assessment: Each transaction requires a tailored analysis of its structural and contractual features in order to determine the applicable regulatory treatment. Send Print Report ### Latest Posts

• Italian SMEs Bill Expands Structuring Options for Inventory Financing Securitizations
• EU Industrial Accelerator Act: What Companies Need to Know
• Key Takeaways from the SEC's Revised Enforcement Manual
• California Textile EPR—Next Steps for Brands and Retailers Before July 1
• Germany: Three Forces Converge to Raise ESG Litigation Stakes See more »

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
Attorney Advertising.

©
Jones Day

Written by:

Jones Day Contact + Follow Marco Frattini + Follow Fabio Maria Guidi + Follow Giuseppina Pagano + Follow Francesco Squerzoni + Follow Vinicio Trombetti + Follow more less

What do you want from legal thought leadership?

Please take our short survey – your perspective helps to shape how firms create relevant, useful content that addresses your needs:

Take the survey now »

Published In:

Capital Markets + Follow Cross-Border Transactions + Follow Financial Regulatory Reform + Follow Financial Services Industry + Follow Financing + Follow Italy + Follow Loans + Follow New Legislation + Follow Securitization + Follow Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) + Follow General Business + Follow Finance & Banking + Follow International Trade + Follow Securities + Follow more less

Jones Day on:

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Sign Up Log in ** By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.* - hide - hide