Court Orders Removal of IEEPA Tariffs on U.S. Imports
Summary
The U.S. Court of International Trade has ordered the government to remove International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) tariffs on U.S. imports, following a Supreme Court decision. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) indicated it could begin issuing refunds within 45 days, though importers are advised to monitor liquidation entries and file protests.
What changed
On March 4, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) ordered U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate millions of unliquidated entries without assessing International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) duties, and to reliquidate final liquidated entries without these duties. This order stems from a Supreme Court ruling in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump that found the IEEPA tariffs unauthorized. The CIT asserted its exclusive jurisdiction over such trade claims.
While this ruling is favorable for importers, potentially leading to refunds without further legal action, CBP has stated that its current systems may not be capable of immediate, large-scale refunds, suggesting a 45-day timeline for commencement. Importers are advised to secure an Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) account to track potential refunds and continue filing protests until the ruling is finalized. Downstream buyers, such as retailers, should review contracts for duty-sharing or price adjustment clauses.
What to do next
- Importers should secure an ACE account to determine expected refund amounts and facilitate refunds via ACH.
- Importers should continue to monitor liquidation entries and file protests until the ruling becomes final.
- Downstream buyers should review agreements for duty-sharing or price adjustment clauses.
Source document (simplified)
March 10, 2026
Court of International Trade Enforces Supreme Court Decision, Orders Removal of IEEPA Tariffs on U.S. Imports
Jon Barooshian, David Shapiro Saul Ewing LLP + Follow Contact LinkedIn Facebook X Send Embed
On March 4, 2026, Judge Richard Eaton of the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued a sweeping order requiring the government to finalize the cost of bringing millions of shipments into the U.S. without assessing the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) tariff that the Supreme Court ruled on February 20, 2026, in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump was unauthorized. Judge Eaton's Order in Atmus Filtration, Inc. v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection et al., states "that with respect to any and all unliquidated entries that were entered subject to the (IEEPA) duties, U.S. Customs and Border Protection is hereby directed to liquidate those entries without regard to the IEEPA duties. Any liquidated entries for which liquidation is not final shall be reliquidated without regard to IEEPA duties."
Judge Eaton also stated in his Order that he had been appointed by the Chief Judge of the CIT to hear all IEEPA-related cases and reiterated the Supreme Court's holding in Learning Resources that the CIT is the only forum for seeking a refund of an unauthorized tariff. Judge Eaton also clarified that the Supreme Court's restriction on universal injunctions in Trump v. CASA does not apply to this relief in the CIT, due to its unique statutory framework since the CIT has national geographic jurisdiction and exclusive subject-matter jurisdiction over trade claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1581.
This is encouraging news for importers, assuming Judge Eaton's Order stands, since CBP will be required to issue refunds without the necessity of any legal action. However, Judge Eaton did not provide a timeline for refunds but pointed out that CBP has systems in place that allow it to issue refunds in a streamlined manner.
In a March 6, 2026, filing ahead of a closed-session conference at CIT, Brandon Lord, CBP's Executive Director of Trade Programs, explained that CBP cannot comply with Judge Eaton's order immediately, asserting that CBP's existing technology and processes are not capable of handling refunds on such a massive scale. Lord points out in the filing that as of Wednesday, March 4, 2026, more than 330,000 importers made a total of over 53 million entries "in which they have deposited or paid duties imposed pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act," and that if CBP is required to issue refunds immediately and all at once, there is a substantial risk of conflicts in CBP systems due to how duties were reported. However, Lord suggested that CBP could be able to begin issuing refunds within 45 days.
Until the Court or CBP provides additional guidance, importers should secure an Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) account, if they do not already have one, which will allow importers to determine expected refund amounts and will allow refunds via ACH. Importers should also continue watching liquidation entries and continue to file protests at least until Judge Eaton's ruling becomes final. Moreover, the Court did not address how refunds for final liquidated entries will be addressed.
Downstream buyers, such as retailers and distributors who purchased goods from importers, want to continue to review their agreements for duty-sharing or price adjustment clauses. Others, whose contracts may not be explicitly call for price adjustments, may want to explore other avenues for recovering their share of the tariff.
For more information, view our previous alert on the Supreme Court's tariff refund decision.
Latest Posts
- Court of International Trade Enforces Supreme Court Decision, Orders Removal of IEEPA Tariffs on U.S. Imports
- HIPAA Business Associate Settles with HHS OCR Following Alleged PHI Breach to the Dark Web
- The Friday Five: Five ERISA Litigation Highlights - March 2026
- Delaware Supreme Court Upholds Delaware General Corporation Law Section 144 Amendments
- Navigating IEEPA Tariff Refunds – The Long Road Ahead and Why Preparation and Timing Matter See more »
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
Attorney Advertising.
©
Saul Ewing LLP
Written by:
Saul Ewing LLP Contact + Follow Jon Barooshian + Follow David Shapiro + Follow more less
What do you want from legal thought leadership?
Please take our short survey – your perspective helps to shape how firms create relevant, useful content that addresses your needs:
Published In:
Court of International Trade + Follow Customs and Border Protection + Follow Distributors + Follow Duties + Follow Enforcement Actions + Follow Importers + Follow Imports + Follow International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) + Follow International Trade + Follow Refunds + Follow SCOTUS + Follow Tariffs + Follow US Trade Policies + Follow Administrative Agency + Follow General Business + Follow International Trade + Follow more less
Saul Ewing LLP on:
"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"
Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Sign Up Log in ** By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.* - hide - hide
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Trade & Export alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when JD Supra Trade Law publishes new changes.